Skip to main content
Log in

An Analogue Study Investigating Differential Parenting of Gender Conforming and Nonconforming Boys

Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Gender nonconforming children are at heightened risk for negative parenting interactions. This study investigated possible explanations for differences in parenting behaviors with gender conforming and nonconforming boys. A sample of 201 adults (43% women/57% men; 81% White, 10% Black/African American, 6% Multiracial, 3% Asian, and 1% American Indian or Alaska Native; and 7% Hispanic/Latinx) ranging in age from 20 to 74 years (M = 35.44, SD = 9.76) were presented two vignettes describing a gender conforming and nonconforming boy. Following each vignette, participants provided endorsements of parenting behaviors and reported their concern for that child’s future. In addition, participants completed measures assessing their attitudes toward homosexuality and need for closure. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences in endorsements of physical discipline or positive parenting for the two boys. Participants did, however, report higher concern for the gender nonconforming boy’s future. Individual differences in homonegativity were associated with greater endorsements of physical discipline toward the gender nonconforming boy, after accounting for endorsements of physical discipline toward the gender conforming boy. Further, higher concern for the gender nonconforming boy’s future was associated with greater endorsements of physical discipline and lower endorsements of positive parenting, after accounting for endorsements of each behavior for the gender conforming boy as well as concern for their future. Intervention efforts to support the parent–child relationship for gender nonconforming boys may benefit from identifying and responding to both negative attitudes toward homosexuality and addressing motivations to change behavior resulting from concern for their child’s future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Availability of Data and Materials

Data available through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8ak3n/).

Code Availability

Code syntax available through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8ak3n/).

References

Download references

Funding

Brian Feinstein was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08DA045575; PI: Feinstein). Kathryn Humphreys was supported by the Jacobs Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship (2017-1261-05) and National Science Foundation (2042285).The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn L. Humphreys.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Ethical Approval and Informed Consent

Ethical review and approval was obtained from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (No: 191157). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacques, K.P., Feinstein, B.A., Darling, A.K. et al. An Analogue Study Investigating Differential Parenting of Gender Conforming and Nonconforming Boys. Arch Sex Behav 51, 3569–3581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02388-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02388-3

Keywords

Navigation