Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Let’s Be a Person to Person and Have a Genuine Conversation”: Comparing Perspectives on PrEP and Sexual Health Communication Between Black Sexual Minority Men and Healthcare Providers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient-provider communication is a key factor affecting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and access among Black sexual minority men (SMM). Optimizing patient-provider communication requires a deeper understanding of communication dynamics. In this study, we investigated the perspectives of both HIV-negative/status-unknown Black SMM and practicing community healthcare providers regarding patient-provider communication about PrEP and sexual health. We conducted eleven semi-structured qualitative focus groups (six with Black SMM; five with providers) in the Northeastern USA and thematically analyzed transcripts. A total of 36 Black SMM and 27 providers participated in the focus groups. Our analysis revealed points of alignment and divergence in the two groups’ perspectives related to patient-provider communication. Points of alignment included: (1) the importance ascribed to maximizing patients’ comfort and (2) belief in patients’ right to non-discriminatory healthcare. Points of divergence included: (1) Black SMM’s preference for sexual privacy versus providers’ preference that patients share sexual information, (2) Black SMM’s perception that providers have an ethical responsibility to initiate conversations about PrEP with patients versus providers’ perception of such conversations as being optional, and (3) Black SMM’s preference for personalized sexual health conversations versus providers’ preference for standardized conversations. Findings underscore a need for providers to offer more patient-centered sexual healthcare to Black SMM, which should entail routinely presenting all prevention options available—including PrEP—and inviting open dialogue about sex, while also respecting patients’ preferences for privacy about their sexuality. This approach could increase PrEP access and improve equity in the US healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Full interview transcripts and individual-level questionnaire data have not been made publicly available to protect the privacy of participants. All excerpts of the transcripts that are relevant to the paper (including those not quoted within the paper) are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Notes

  1. We use the term sexual minority men (SMM) throughout this work to refer to “men whose sexual identities, orientations, or behaviors differ from the heterosexual majority” (Timmins & Duncan, 2020, p. 1667), including when referring to study samples or surveillance categories originally labeled as men who have sex with men (MSM).

  2. Two research team members conducted a sixth group with community healthcare providers in Massachusetts, but this group was excluded from the analytic sample because it was considerably shorter (began late and terminated prematurely due to health center schedule constraints), was repeatedly interrupted, was held substantially later than the first five (summer of 2016 vs. 2015), and was considerably larger in size (n = 18).

  3. Further inspection of questionnaire and transcript data from the three providers who reported specializing in women’s healthcare indicated that two of three had experience caring for SMM patients. The third, who did not have experience caring for SMM patients, is not quoted in the results.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the focus group participants who generously dedicated their time and effort to study participation. We are also grateful to those who assisted with study recruitment, including community health center leaders who helped to disseminate study recruitment materials and coordinate focus group logistics.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; K01-MH103080; PI: Sarah K. Calabrese). Resources were contributed by the Yale University Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, which is funded by the NIH (P30-MH062294). Support was also received from the District of Columbia Center for AIDS Research, which is funded by the NIH (P30-AI117970). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conceptualization was led by SKC and SR with support from all co-authors. Data were collected by SKC, AIE, and DD. Formal analyses were led by SR with support from SKC, DM, and MT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SKC and SR. All authors provided feedback on the drafted manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. Calabrese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sarah K. Calabrese received partial support from Gilead Sciences to attend a research conference. Douglas S. Krakower has been a consultant to Fenway Health for research studies funded by Gilead Sciences, has a pending grant with unrestricted project support from Merck, and has received personal fees to develop medical education content for Medscape, MED-IQ, DKBMed, and UpToDate, Inc. Kenneth H. Mayer has conducted research with unrestricted project support from Gilead Sciences and Merck and is a member of the faculty and advisory board of the National LGBTQIA + Health Education Center, which the paper references in the discussion as a source of health education resources.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were approved by the Yale University Human Subjects Committee (#HSC-1308012487) prior to implementation. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Sarah K. Calabrese and Sharanya Rao are co-first authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calabrese, S.K., Rao, S., Eldahan, A.I. et al. “Let’s Be a Person to Person and Have a Genuine Conversation”: Comparing Perspectives on PrEP and Sexual Health Communication Between Black Sexual Minority Men and Healthcare Providers. Arch Sex Behav 51, 2583–2601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02213-3

Keywords

Navigation