Skip to main content
Log in

Assigned-Female-at-Birth Trans Masculine and Non-Binary Individuals Differ in Their Body Satisfaction and Desire for Gender Affirming Treatments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many non-binary individuals physically affirm their gender, but the binary/non-binary component of gender identity is rarely reported, and when it is, assigned-male- and assigned-female-at-birth individuals are often grouped together. We compared the experience of assigned-female-at-birth trans masculine and non-binary individuals via an anonymous online survey and found that patterns of overall body satisfaction and strength of intention to modify the body support the idea that the lower engagement in physical affirmation by non-binary individuals reflects less need to undergo body modifications. Trans masculine and non-binary participants who had had at least one gender affirming treatment (GAT) mostly identified as trans and expressed a similar ranking of GAT preferences. In contrast, non-physically affirmed cohorts differed in strength of intention to modify their body, desired GAT and the proportion who identified as trans, with more than a third of non-physically affirmed non-binary individuals not wanting any GAT and a third wanting GAT without testosterone. Several participants who did not want testosterone used female-based identifiers suggesting that some non-binary individuals use GAT to defeminize rather than masculinize their bodies. Individuals’ orientation to the binary/non-binary and trans/non-trans dimensions of identity appears connected to their strength of motivation to physically affirm and their preferred outcomes but there is ambiguity in the usage of the terms. We need to explore what these terms mean to a given individual if we are to support them as they make decisions about whether and how to modify their body to affirm their gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Requests for data sharing may be made to the authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was improved by suggestions provided by J’amie Grant, Vivian Brown, Gloria Weissman, and Aspen Russell. We thank all the individuals who participated in and helped market our survey.

Funding

This study was funded by American University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Schaeff.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of American University. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaeff, C. Assigned-Female-at-Birth Trans Masculine and Non-Binary Individuals Differ in Their Body Satisfaction and Desire for Gender Affirming Treatments. Arch Sex Behav 51, 2037–2047 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02178-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02178-3

Keywords

Navigation