Skip to main content

Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Abed, R., Mehta, S., Figueredo, A. J., Aldridge, S., Balson, H., Meyer, C., & Palmer, R. (2012). Eating disorders and intrasexual competition: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis among young women. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/290813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguinaldo, E. R., & Peissig, J. J. (2021). Who’s behind the makeup? The effects of varying levels of cosmetics application on perceptions of facial attractiveness, competence, and sociosexuality. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_151-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, C., Havlíček, J., & Roberts, S. C. (2019). The effects of artificial fragrances on human olfactory communication. In C. D. Buesching (Ed.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 14 (pp. 107–117). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, S. L. (2019). The importance of attractiveness across cultures. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross-Cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (pp. 598–613). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Arnocky, S. (2020). Mate-value moderates the relationship between intrasexual competitiveness and successful mate poaching. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00242-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnocky, S., & Locke, A. (2020). Jealousy mediates the link between women’s upward physical appearance comparison and mate retention behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 18(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920973990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-015-0037-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.510132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnocky, S., Proietti, V., Ruddick, E. L., Côté, T. R., Ortiz, T. L., Hodson, G., & Carré, J. M. (2019). Aggression toward sexualized women is mediated by decreased perceptions of humanness. Psychological Science, 30(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619836106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arslan, R. C., Schilling, K. M., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018). Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 410–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Axelsson, J., Sundelin, T., Olsson, M. J., Sorjonen, K., Axelsson, C., Lasselin, J., & Lekander, M. (2018). Identification of acutely sick people and facial cues of sickness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1870), 20172430. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barton, S., Eastham, A., Isom, A., McIaverty, D., & Soong, Y. L. (Eds.). (2020). Discovering cosmetic science. Croydon: Royal Society of Chemistry.

  15. Beall, A. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Women are more likely to wear red or pink at peak fertility. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benenson, J. F. (2013). The development of human female competition: Allies and adversaries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130079. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernard, P., Servais, L., Wollast, R., & Gervais, S. (2020). An initial test of the cosmetics dehumanization hypothesis: Heavy makeup diminishes attributions of humanness-related traits to women. Sex Roles, 83(5), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01115-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Biernaskie, J. M., Perry, J. C., & Grafen, A. (2018). A general model of biological signals, from cues to handicaps. Evolution Letters, 2(3), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Blake, K. R. (2021). Attractiveness helps women secure mates, but also status and reproductively relevant resources [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01949-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bleske-Rechek, A., & Lighthall, M. (2010). Attractiveness and rivalry in women’s friendships with women. Human Nature, 21(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9081-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bradshaw, H. K., & DelPriore, D. J. (2021). Beautification is more than mere mate attraction: Extending evolutionary perspectives on female appearance enhancement [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01952-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2018). Put a (limbal) ring on it: Women perceive men’s limbal rings as a health cue in short-term mating domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217733072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burch, R. L. (2020). More than just a pretty face: The overlooked contributions of women in evolutionary psychology textbooks. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buss, D. M., Durkee, P. K., Shackelford, T. K., Bowdle, B. F., Schmitt, D. P., Brase, G. L., Choe, J. C., & Trofimova, I. (2020). Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Sexual strategies theory. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1861-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Cahoon, D. D., & Edmonds, E. M. (1989). Male-female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(3), 280–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(87)90037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clarkson, T. R., Sidari, M. J., Sains, R., Alexander, M., Harrison, M., Mefodeva, V., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2020). A multivariate analysis of women’s mating strategies and sexual selection on men’s facial morphology. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 191209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Clutton-Brock, T., & Huchard, E. (2013). Social competition and its consequences in female mammals. Journal of Zoology, 289(3), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis, A. C, Arnocky, S., Mackinnon, M., A., & McKelvie, L. (in press). Men’s extra-pair sexual interest. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on sexual psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  33. Davis, A. C., Desrochers, J., DiFilippo, A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Type of jealousy differentially predicts cost-inflicting and benefit-provisioning mate retention. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., & Archer, J. (2020). Evolutionary roots of women’s aggression: Causes, contexts, and consequences. In F. M. Cheung & D. F. Halpern (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the international psychology of women (pp. 258–272). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. DeBruine, L. M. (2014). Women’s preferences for male facial features. In V. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 261–275). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. DeBruine, L. M., Little, A., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Extending parasite stress theory to variation in human mate preferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 86–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Klerk, H. M., & Lubbe, S. (2008). Female consumers’ evaluation of apparel quality: Exploring the importance of aesthetics. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 12(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020810857934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dixson, B. J. (2021). Sexual selection and the evolution of human appearance enhancements [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01946-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Eisenburch, S., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2015). Lady in red: Hormonal predictors of women’s clothing choices. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1332–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Elliot, A. J., Greitemeyer, T., & Pazda, A. D. (2013). Women’s use of red clothing as a sexual signal in intersexual interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2014). Color psychology: Effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fisher, M. L., & Moule, K. R. (2013). A new direction for intrasexual competition research: Cooperative versus competitive motherhood. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fisher, M. L., Burch, B., & Sokol-Chang, R. (2017). A theoretical proposal for examining the integration of cooperative and competitive mothering behavior. Human Ethology Bulletin, 32(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/321/006-016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fournier, H., & Ineson, E. M. (2010). Closing the gap between education and industry: Skills’ and competencies’ requirements for food service internships in Switzerland. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 22(4), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2010.10696990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Frederick, D. A., & Reynolds, T. A. (2021). The value of integrating evolutionary and sociocultural perspectives on body image. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01947-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Freeberg, T. M., Book, D. L., Jung, H., & Kyle, S. C. (2017). Communication cues and signals. In T. Shackelford & V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2728-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Geary, D. C., Winegard, B., & Winegard, B. (2014). Reflections on the evolution of human sex differences: Social selection and the evolution of competition among women. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 393–412). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Ghodsee, K. (2007). Potions, lotions and lipstick: The gendered consumption of cosmetics and perfumery in socialist and post-socialist urban Bulgaria. Women’s Studies International Forum, 30(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ginsberg, A. (1955). Operational definitions and theories. Journal of General Psychology, 52(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1955.9920241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low-and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Groyecka, A., Pisanski, K., Sorokowska, A., Havlíček, J., Karwowski, M., Puts, D., & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Attractiveness is multimodal: Beauty is also in the nose and ear of the beholder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00778

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Guéguen, N. (2012). Makeup and menstrual cycle: Near ovulation, women use more cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62(3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gurung, R. A. R., & Chrouser, C. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gurung, R. A., Punke, E., Brickner, M., & Badalamenti, V. (2018). Power and provocativeness: The effects of subtle changes in clothing on perceptions of working women. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(2), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1331991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hanna, E., Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Jerald, M., Reed, L., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2017). Contributions of social comparison and self-objectification in mediating associations between Facebook use and emergent adults’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 23, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90003-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hendrickse, J., Arpan, L. M., Clayton, R. B., & Ridgway, J. L. (2017). Instagram and college women’s body image: Investigating the roles of appearance-related comparisons and intrasexual competition. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hill, E. M., Nocks, E. S., & Gardner, L. (1987). Physical attractiveness: Manipulation by physique and status displays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(87)90037-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of envy. In R. H. Smith (Ed.), Envy: Theory and research (pp. 60–70). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A. J., Hahn, A. C., Kandrik, M., Bovet, J., Renoult, J. P., Simmons, D., Garrod, O., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women’s faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(12), 1589–1595. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hone, L. S., & McCullough, M. E. (2020). Are women more likely to wear red and pink at peak fertility? What about on cold days? Conceptual, close, and extended replications with novel clothing colour measures. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 945–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Howlett, N., Pine, K. J., Cahill, N., Orakçıoğlu, İ, & Fletcher, B. C. (2015). Unbuttoned: The interaction between provocativeness of female work attire and occupational status. Sex Roles, 72(3), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0450-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). The woman that never evolved. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Jach, Ł, & Moroń, M. (2020). I can wear a beard, but you should shave Preferences for men’s facial hair from the perspective of both sexes. Evolutionary Psychology, 18(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920961728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Jellinek, P. (1997). Fragrance in cosmetic products. In J. S. Jellinek (Ed.), The psychological basis of perfumery (pp. 131–137). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. Johnson, S. K., Podratz, K. E., Dipboye, R. L., & Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “beauty is beastly” effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Johnson, V., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2011). Defusing the objectification of women by other women: The role of competence. Sex Roles, 65, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0006-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2019). Ovulation, sex hormones, and women’s mating psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jones, B. C., Jones, A. L., Shiramizu, V., & Anderson, C. (2021). What does women’s facial attractiveness signal? Implications for an evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01955-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(6), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00083-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., & Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1086/204427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Karimova, G. Z., Rassilbay, A., & Sauers, D. A. (2017). Lingerie and morality Generation Y Kazakhstani women’s attitude toward lingerie. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v4i1.149

  77. Kelan, E. K. (2013). The becoming of business bodies: Gender, appearance, and leadership development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612469009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kellie, D. J., Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2021). Behind the makeup: The effects of cosmetics on women’s self-objectification, and their objectification by others. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kim, H. E., & Hiromi, T. (1995). Effects of the menstrual cycle on dressing behavior in the cold. Physiology & Behavior, 58(4), 699–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)00118-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (2018). Principles of research in behavioral science. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. Knack, J. M., Tsar, V., Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2012). What protects rejected adolescents from also being bullied by their peers? The moderating role of peer-valued characteristics. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00792.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kościński, K. (2013). Perception of facial attractiveness from static and dynamic stimuli. Perception, 42(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Kramer, R. S., & Mulgrew, J. (2018). Displaying red and black on a first date: A field study using the “first dates” television series. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918769417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Law Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., & Hillier, S. G. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 273(1583), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Lee, K. S., Brittain, H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2018). Predicting dating behavior from aggression and self-perceived social status in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 44(4), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Lehmann, G. K., & Calin-Jageman, R. J. (2017). Is red really romantic? Social Psychology, 48(3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Lemay, E. P., Jr., Clark, M. S., & Greenberg, A. (2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Lenochová, P., Vohnoutova, P., Roberts, S. C., Oberzaucher, E., Grammer, K., & Havlíček, J. (2012). Psychology of fragrance use: Perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Lephart, E. D. (2018). A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17(3), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Evolutionary psychology: A how-to guide. American Psychologist, 72(4), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lewis, D. M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2021). Appearance enhancement: A cue-based approach [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01957-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lyon, B. E., & Montgomerie, R. (2012). Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 367(1600), 2266–2273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Maestripieri, D., Henry, A., & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., de Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 1100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Mandler, G., & Kessen, W. (1959). The language of psychology. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Marcinkowska, U. M., & Holzleitner, I. J. (2020). Stability of women’s facial shape throughout the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1924), 20192910. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2910

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39350-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Matsushita, S., Morikawa, K., & Yamanami, H. (2015). Measurement of eye size illusion caused by eyeliner, mascara, and eye shadow. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 66(3), 161–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Miller, B. (2020). A picture is worth 1000 messages: Investigating face and body photos on mobile dating apps for men who have sex with men. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(13), 1798–1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1610630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Moule, K. R., & Fisher, M. (2015). You can look but you cannot touch: Male behaviors observed in lingerie stores. Human Ethology Bulletin, 29(4), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Naezer, M. (2020). Sexy selves: Girls, selfies and the performance of intersectional identities. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 27(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818804845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Walker, L. S. (2016). Revisiting the beauty is beastly effect: Examining when and why sex and attractiveness impact hiring judgments. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(10), 1034–1058. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1053963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Pazda, A. D., Thorstenson, C. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2021). The effect of red on attractiveness for highly attractive women. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Pazhoohi, F., & Kingstone, A. (2020). The effect of eyelash length on attractiveness: A previously uninvestigated indicator of beauty. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Prokop, P., & Hromada, M. (2013). Women use red in order to attract mates. Ethology, 119(7), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Provine, R. R., Cabrera, M. O., & Nave-Blodgett, J. (2013). Red, yellow, and super-white sclera. Human Nature, 24(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9168-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Talamas, S. N., Mavor, K. I., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Blinded by beauty: Attractiveness bias and accurate perceptions of academic performance. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Tesone, D. V., & Ricci, P. (2006). Toward a definition of entry-level job competencies: Hospitality manager perspectives. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 7(4), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v07n04_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  114. Tifferet, S., & Vilnai-Yavetz, I. (2018). Self-presentation in LinkedIn portraits: Common features, gender, and occupational differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp006oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Tracy, J. L., & Beall, A. T. (2014). The impact of weather on women’s tendency to wear red or pink when at high risk for conception. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Reynolds, T. A. (2021). Our grandmothers’ legacy: Challenges faced by female ancestors leave traces in modern women’s same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01768-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Roberts, S. C., Havlíček, J., & Schaal, B. (2020). Human olfactory communication: Current challenges and future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1800), 20190258. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Röder, S., Brewer, G., & Fink, B. (2009). Menstrual cycle shifts in women’s self-perception and motivation: A daily report method. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 616–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Rucas, S. L., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., Winking, J., Gangestad, S., & Crespo, M. (2006). Female intrasexual competition and reputational effects on attractiveness among the Tsimane of Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Ruffle, B. J., & Shtudiner, Z. E. (2015). Are good-looking people more employable? Management Science, 61(8), 1760–1776. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Russell, R. (2011). Why cosmetics work. In R. B. Adams, N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, & S. Shimojo (Eds.), The science of social vision (pp. 186–204). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Russell, R., Batres, C., Courrèges, S., Kaminski, G., Soppelsa, F., Morizot, F., & Porcheron, A. (2019). Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Schleifenbaum, L., Driebe, J., Penke, L., & Arslan, R. (2021). Women feel more attractive before ovulation: Evidence from a large-scale online diary study. Evolutionary Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2008). Self-perceived and observed variations in women’s attractiveness throughout the menstrual cycle—a diary study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Sedgewick, J. R., Flath, M. E., & Elias, L. J. (2017). Presenting your best self (ie): The influence of gender on vertical orientation of selfies on Tinder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Selensky, J. C., & Carels, R. A. (2021). Weight stigma and media: An examination of the effect of advertising campaigns on weight bias, internalized weight bias, self-esteem, body image, and affect. Body Image, 36, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., & Havlíček, J. (2016). Body odor based personality judgments: the effect of fragranced cosmetics. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Stockley, P., & Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2011). Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Biological Reviews, 86(2), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00149.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Stower, R. E., Lee, A. J., McIntosh, T. L., Sidari, M. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. (2020). Mating strategies and the masculinity paradox: How relationship context, relationship status, and sociosexuality shape women’s preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1437-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Surbeck, M., Mundry, R., & Hohmann, G. (2011). Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proceedings of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 278(1705), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In S. M. Coyne & J. M. Ostrov (Eds.), The development of relational aggression (pp. 111–126). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Valentova, J. V., Mafra, A. L., & Varella, M. A. C. (2021). Enhancing the evolutionary science of self-presentation modification [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01975-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Vervaecke, H., De Vries, H. A. N., & Van Elsacker, L. (2000). Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive group of bonobos (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology, 21(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005471512788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Wampold, B. E., Davis, B., & Good, R. H. I. I. I. (1990). Hypothesis validity of clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.58.3.360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Wang, X., Chen, H., Chen, Z., & Yang, Y. (2021). Women’s intrasexual competition results in beautification. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620933403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Weaving, C. (2014). It is okay to play as long as you wear lingerie (or skimpy bikinis): A moral evaluation of the Lingerie Football League and its rebranding. Sport in Society, 17(6), 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2014.882905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. West-Eberhard, M. J. (1983). Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology, 58(2), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1086/413215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Wookey, M. L., Graves, N. A., & Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sexy appearance on perceived competence of women. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.149.1.116-118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Żelaźniewicz, A., Nowak, J., Łącka, P., & Pawłowski, B. (2020). Facial appearance and metabolic health biomarkers in women. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70119-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Arnocky.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, A.C., Arnocky, S. Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification. Arch Sex Behav (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02170-x

Download citation