Abstract
This study examined the effects of relationship status on response times to sexual and romantic stimuli during a memory task, which has not been studied before. Based on previous studies on sexual attitudes and behaviors, we hypothesized that response times to sexual stimuli would be faster in individuals who were in a relationship, compared to those who were not. We also hypothesized that the response times to sexual stimuli of individuals who were not in a relationship would be slower than their response time to romantic stimuli. A total of 348 college students memorized 27 sexual, romantic, and neutral sentences and were later asked to recognize them. The students’ response times to each sentence were recorded. The results of a 2 (gender) × 2 (stimulus type) × 2 (relationship status) ANOVA showed that response times to sexual sentences were faster in participants who were in a relationship, compared to those who were not. Furthermore, participants who were not in a relationship responded more slowly to sexual than to romantic sentences. Thus, our hypotheses were supported. Individuals’ relationship status influenced their response times to sexual and romantic stimuli even after controlling for the effects of gender.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support our findings of the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019). What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 785–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000197
Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.347
Becker, D. V., Sagarin, B. J., Guadagno, R. E., Millevoi, A., & Nicastle, L. D. (2004). When the sexes need not differ: Emotional responses to the sexual and emotional aspects of infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11, 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00096.x
Bianco, V., Berchicci, M., Quinzi, F., Perri, R. L., Spinelli, D., & di Russo, F. (2020). Females are more proactive, males are more reactive: Neural basis of the gender-related speed/accuracy trade-off in visuo-motor tasks. Brain Structure and Function, 225, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01998-3
Brotto, L. A., Woo, J. S. T., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2012). Differences in sexual guilt and desire in East Asian and Euro-Canadian men. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.618956
Burchell, J. L., & Ward, J. (2011). Sex drive, attachment style, relationship status and previous infidelity as predictors of sex differences in romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.002
Busch, T. M. (2020). Perceived acceptability of sexual and romantic fantasizing. Sexuality and Culture, 24, 848–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09668-6
Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (6th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Cacioppo, S., Bianchi-Demicheli, F., Frum, C., Pfaus, J. G., & Lewis, J. W. (2012). The common neural bases between sexual desire and love: A multilevel kernel density fMRI analysis. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02651.x
Canli, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Imaging gender differences in sexual arousal. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 325–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0404-325
Chadwick, S. B., Burke, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Multifaceted sexual desire and hormonal associations: Accounting for social location, relationship status, and desire target. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2445–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0959-8
Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x
Chivers, M. L., & Brotto, L. A. (2017). Controversies of women’s sexual arousal and desire. European Psychologist, 22, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000274
Dang, S. S., Gorzalka, B. B., & Brotto, L. A. (2019). Dual control model in a cross-cultural context: Role of sexual excitation in sexual response and behavior differences between Chinese and Euro-Caucasian women in Canada. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2519–2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01535-7
Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173
Fisher, H. E. (1994). The nature of romantic love. Journal of NIH Research, 6, 59–64.
Fisher, T. D. (2007). Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9094-7
Flaisch, T., Imhof, M., Schmälzle, R., Wentz, K., Ibach, B., & Schupp, H. T. (2015). Implicit and explicit attention to pictures and words: An fMRI-study of concurrent emotional stimulus processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01861
Ganesan, A., Morandini, J. S., Veldre, A., Hsu, K. J., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2020). Ethnic differences in visual attention to sexual stimuli among Asian and White heterosexual women and men. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109630
Geer, J. H., & Bellard, H. S. (1996). Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437581
Geer, J. H., & McGlone, M. S. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939008406766
Geer, J. H., Judice, S., & Jackson, S. (1994). Reading times for erotic material: The pause to reflect. Journal of General Psychology, 121, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1994.9921208
Guadagno, R. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2010). Sex differences in jealousy: An evolutionary perspective on online infidelity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2636–2655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00674.x
Guo, Y. (2019). Sexual double standards in White and Asian Americans: Ethnicity, gender, and acculturation. Sexuality and Culture, 23, 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9543-1
Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1208
Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1082
Hill, A. C., Laird, A. R., & Robinson, J. L. (2014). Gender differences in working memory networks: A BrainMap meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 102, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.06.008
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
Japanese Association for Sex Education. (2012). Seisyounen no sei: wadakuni no cyugakusei koukousei daigakusei ni kansuru dai nana kai cyousahoukoku [Sexual behavior of youth: the 7th survey report of junior high school, high school, and university students in Japan]. Tokyo, Japan: The Foundation for the Advancement of Juvenile Education in Japan
Kato, T. (2014a). A reconsideration of sex differences in response to sexual and emotional infidelity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0276-4
Kato, T. (2014b). Testing the sexual imagination hypothesis for gender differences in response to infidelity. BMC Research Notes, 7, 860. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-860
Kato, T. (2019). Gender differences in response to infidelity types and rival attractiveness. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2019.1639657
Kato, T. (in press). Sexual jealousy in males: The evolution of a specific mechanism for sexual jealousy. In T. K. Shackelford (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of evolutionary perspectives on sexual psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., & Geer, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in memory for a sexual story. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541848
Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Bellen, G., & Hanewald, G. (1994). Women’s sexual and emotional responses to male- and female-produced erotica. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542096
Lefkowitz, E. S., Vasilenko, S. A., Wesche, R., & Maggs, J. L. (2019). Changes in diverse sexual and contraceptive behaviors across college. Journal of Sex Research, 56, 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1499854
Leitenberg, H., & Hcnning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.469
Lewis, R. J., Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Sexual experience and recall of sexual vs. nonsexual information. Journal of Personality, 54, 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00419.x
McCall, K. M., Rellini, A. H., Seal, B. N., & Meston, C. M. (2007). Sex differences in memory for sexually-relevant information. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9106-7
Miller, J. (1991). Reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: Bias varies with sample size. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749108400962
Murnen, S. K., & Stockton, M. (1997). Gender and self-reported sexual arousal in response to sexual stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 37, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025639609402
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
Peplau, L. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01221
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017504
Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9
Schmitt, D. P., & 118 Members of the International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.85
Schubring, D., & Schupp, H. T. (2019). Affective picture processing: Alpha- and lower beta-band desynchronization reflects emotional arousal. Psychophysiology, 56, e13386. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13386
Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2012). Gender differences in associations of sexual and romantic stimuli: Do young men really prefer sex over romance? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9794-5
van Anders, S. M., Brotto, L., Farrell, J., & Yule, M. (2009). Associations among physiological and subjective sexual response, sexual desire, and salivary steroid hormones in healthy premenopausal women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01123.x
Voracek, M. (2001). Marital status as a candidate moderator variable of male-female differences in sexual jealousy: The need for representative population samples. Psychological Reports, 88, 553–566. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.88.2.553-566
Woo, J. S. T., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2011). The role of sex guilt in the relationship between culture and women’s sexual desire. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 385–394.
Acknowledgements
I appreciate Prof. Yuka Iwase’s comments in translating Japanese sentences into English to prepare this article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TK: All works, including conceptualization, funding acquisition, all writing, data curation, methodology, formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with APA ethical guidelines for the participation of human subjects, the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national), and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kato, T. Effect of Relationship Status on Response Times to Sexual and Romantic Stimuli Among Japanese Undergraduates in a Memory Task. Arch Sex Behav 51, 601–610 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02149-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02149-8