Abstract
Research indicates that men view their women partner’s orgasms as reflections of their masculinity and sexual esteem. The purpose of this study was to examine this phenomenon in more detail by exploring whether men’s feelings of masculinity and sexual esteem, as well as their feelings of accomplishment, were influenced by the method by which their woman partner experienced orgasm. Specifically, 193 young adult men (primarily between the ages of 18 and 24) read one of three vignettes (a partner orgasming from intercourse, from manual/oral stimulation, or from vibrator use) and then rated their imagined feelings of masculinity, accomplishment, and sexual esteem. Findings indicated that men who imagined their partner orgasmed from intercourse or manual/oral stimulation had higher feelings of masculinity and accomplishment than those who imagined their partner orgasmed from a vibrator. We found a significant interaction between clitoral knowledge and vignette condition in predicting masculinity, with clitoral knowledge only predicting masculinity for men in the manual/oral stimulation condition. The results of this study have important implications for sex education and the prevention of sexual problems, as well as for the future study of positive sexual functioning in women and men.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
When we refer to clitoral stimulation, we are referring to clitoral glans stimulation unless otherwise noted (as opposed to referring to stimulation of the entire clitoris, including its internal components; Pauls, 2015).
References
Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The “fair deal”? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6, 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002005
Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Do women’s orgasms function as a masculinity achievement for men? Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1283484
Cormier, L. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2018). Anti-climactic: Investigating how late adolescents perceive and deal with orgasm difficulty in the context of their intimate relationships. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 27, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2018-001
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z
Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 2645–2652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12669
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2018, January 24). Powering your interaction. Approaching significance. https://approachingblog.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/powering-your-interaction-2/.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Herbenick, D., Fu, T. J., Arter, J., Sanders, S. A., & Dodge, B. (2018). Women’s experiences with genital touching, sexual pleasure, and orgasm: Results from a U.S. probability sample of women ages 18 to 94. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 44, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1346530
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by women in the United States: Results from a nationally representative study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01318.x
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Women’s vibrator use in sexual partnerships: Results from a nationally representative survey in the United States. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230903375677
Lamb, S., Kosterina, E. V., Roberts, T., Brodt, M., Maroney, M., & Dangler, L. (2018). Voices of the mind: Hegemonic masculinity and others in mind during young men’s sexual encounters. Men and Masculinities, 21, 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17695038
Mahar, E. A., Mintz, L. B., & Akers, B. M. (2020). Orgasm equality: Scientific findings and societal implications. Current Sexual Health Reports, 12, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-020-00237-9
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
Mintz, L. (2017). Becoming cliterate: Why orgasm equality matters-and how to get it. HarperCollins.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903171794
Nobre, P., Gouveia, P., & Gomes, A. (2003). Sexual Dysfunctional Beliefs Questionnaire: An instrument to assess sexual dysfunctional beliefs as vulnerability factors to sexual problems. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 171–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468199031000061281
Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.753982
Pauls, R. N. (2015). Anatomy of the clitoris and the female sexual response. Clinical Anatomy, 28, 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22524
Reece, M., Herbenick, D., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., Ghassemi, A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2009). Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use by men in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 1867–1874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01290.x
Rogers, A. (2005). Chaos to control: Men’s magazines and the mastering of intimacy. Men and Masculinities, 8, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X04265319
Salisbury, C. A., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.838934
Snell, W., & Papini, D. (1989). The Sexuality Scale: An instrument to measure sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498909551510
Stelzl, M., & Lafrance, M. N. (2021). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: Women’s accounts of feigning sexual pleasure. Feminism & Psychology, 31, 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520963967
Wade, D., Kremer, C., & Brown, J. (2005). The incidental orgasm: The presence of clitoral knowledge and the absence of orgasm for women. Women and Health, 42, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v42n01_07
White, M. H., II. (2018, April 14). On calculating power for interactions in 2 x 2 factorial designs. https://www.markhw.com/blog/power-twoway.
Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1565–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1149-z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Institutional Review Board of the University of Florida.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Savoury, M.C., Mahar, E.A. & Mintz, L.B. Feelings of Masculinity and Accomplishment in Response to Penetrative versus Non-Penetrative Orgasms. Arch Sex Behav 51, 611–620 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02070-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02070-0