Abstract
The increasingly ubiquitous use of sexting among adolescent girls underscores the importance of empirical data on their sexting behaviors, motivations, and outcomes. To date, the majority of sexting studies have been conducted online; however, little is known about the extent to which responding to such socially sensitive questions may cause participant discomfort or distress. Research on this question is critical since in the absence of empirical data, institutional review boards (IRBs) may permit or place restrictions on online sexting studies based on an under- or overestimation of adolescent participation risk. The current online study asked 210 girls (aged 14–18 years, 55% non-Hispanic White, with sexting experience in the past 12 months) who previously registered to take online surveys on (1) their anticipated comfort in responding to a sexting survey include items on sexting motivations, positive and negative sexting consequences, and related sexual behaviors; (2) their perceptions of sexting research benefits/harms; and (3) comfort discussing similar topics in everyday life and with health professionals. Overall, participants were comfortable responding to sexting survey questions, rated sexting research as high benefits and low risks, and felt about the same as or more comfortable completing a sexting survey than discussing similar topics with peers, parents, or healthcare professionals. Findings suggest that anonymous online sexting studies can be classified as minimal risk research for adolescent girls and provide empirical support for IRB decisions to waive guardian permission for participation in such studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data have not been published.
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2016). Guidelines for adolescent health research. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 127, e183–e186
American Psychological Association. (2018). APA resolution on support for the expansion of mature minors’ ability to participate in research. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-minors-research.pdf
Arrington-Sanders, R., Morgan, A., Oidtman, J., Dao, A., Moon, M., Fortenberry, J. D., & Ott, M. A. (2017). Sexual health research with young black men who have sex with men: Experiences of benefits and harms. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(4), 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0715-5
Barrense-Dias, Y., Suris, J. C., & Akre, C. (2019). “When it deviates it becomes harassment, doesn’t it?”: A qualitative study on the definition of sexting according to adolescents and young adults, parents, and teachers. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2357–2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1358-5
Bragard, E., & Fisher, C. B. (2020, August 6–9). Sexual agency and peer influences on perceived sexting consequences among adolescent girls [Conference session]. APA 2020 Convention, Washington, DC. https://convention.apa.org/
Burén, J., & Lunde, C. (2018). Sexting among adolescents: A nuanced and gendered online challenge for young people. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.003
Carifio, J. (1992, March 5–9). Parallel short forms of the Crandall Social Desirability Test for Children: Shortening instruments for research purposes [Conference presentation]. Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED343915.pdf
Catallozzi, M., de Roche, A. M., Hu, M. C., Breitkopf, C. R., Chang, J., Ipp, L. S., Francis, J., & Rosenthal, S. L. (2017). Adolescent and parent willingness to participate in microbicide safety studies. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 30(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.009
Choi, H., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2016). Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.005
Cox Communication. (2009). Teen online and wireless safety survey: Cyberbullying, sexting and parental controls. http://www.scribd.com/doc/20023365/2009-Cox-Teen-Online- Wireless-Safety-Survey Cyberbullying-Sexting-and-Parental-Controls
Department of Health and Human Services. (2019). Code for federal regulations: Protection of human subjects (Title 45; Part 46). Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fisher, C. B. (2003). Adolescent and parent perspectives on ethical issues in youth drug use and suicide survey research. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1304_1
Fisher, C. B., Arbeit, M. R., Dumont, M. S., Macapagal, K., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Self-consent for HIV prevention research involving sexual and gender minority youth: Reducing barriers through evidence-based ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616633963
Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Desmond, M., Macapagal, K., & Mustanski, B. (2017). Facilitators and barriers to participation in prep HIV prevention trials involving transgender male and female adolescents and emerging adults. AIDS Education and Prevention, 29(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2017.29.3.205
Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Ibrahim Puri, L., Macapagal, K., & Mustanski, B. (2018). “Free testing and prep without outing myself to parents”: Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0200560–e0200560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200560
Fisher, C. B., & Mustanski, B. (2014). Reducing health disparities and enhancing the responsible conduct of research involving LGBT youth. Hastings Center Report, 44(s4), S28–S31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.367
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Sexting: A brief guide for educators and parents [fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.cyberbullying.us/Sexting_Fact_Sheet.pdf
Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Arata, C., O’Brien, N., Bowers, D., & Klibert, J. (2006). Sensitive research with adolescents: Just how upsetting are self-report surveys anyway? Violence and Victims, 21(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.21.4.425
Macapagal, K., Bettin, E., Matson, M., Kraus, A., Fisher, C. B., & Mustanski, B. (2019). Measuring discomfort in health research relative to everyday events and routine care: An application to sexual and gender minority youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(5), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.293
Macapagal, K., Coventry, R., Arbeit, M. R., Fisher, C. B., & Mustanski, B. (2017). “I won’t out myself just to do a survey”: Sexual and gender minority adolescents’ perspectives on the risks and benefits of sex research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1393–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0784-5
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1730
Mori, C., Temple, J. R., Browne, D., & Madigan, S. (2019). Association of sexting with sexual behaviors and mental health among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(8), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1658
Mustanski, B. (2011). Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1
Mustanski, B., & Fisher, C. B. (2016). HIV rates are increasing in gay/bisexual teens: IRB barriers to research must be resolved to bend the curve. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(2), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.026
Newman, E., Willard, T., Sinclair, R., & Kaloupek, D. (2001). Empirically supported ethical research practice: The costs and benefits of research from the participants’ view. Accountability in Research, 8(4), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620108573983
Overstreet, N., Okuyan, M., & Fisher, C. B. (2018). Perceived risks and benefits in IPV and HIV research: Listening to the voices of HIV-positive African American women. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618797557
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2019). The nature and extent of sexting among a national sample of middle and high school students in the U. S. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2333–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1449-y
Peterson, R. A. (2000). A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters, 11(3), 261–275
Priebe, G., Backstrom, M., & Ainsaar, M. (2010). Vulnerable adolescent participants’ experience in surveys on sexuality and sexual abuse: Ethical aspects. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(6), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.10.005
Rice, E., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Sanchez, M., Montoya, J., Plant, A., & Kordic, T. (2012). Sexually explicit cell phone messaging associated with sexual risk among adolescents. Pediatrics, 130(4), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0021
Rinehart, J. K., Nason, E. E., Yeater, E. A., & Miller, G. F. (2017). Do some students need special protection from research on sex and trauma? New evidence for young adult resilience in “sensitive topics” research. Journal of Sex Research, 54(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1156047
Rosenthal, S. L., Morris, M. C., Hoffman, L. F., & Zimet, G. D. (2018). Inclusion of adolescents in STI/HIV biomedical prevention trials: Autonomy, decision making, and parental involvement. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 6(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000209
Society for Research in Child Development. (2021). Ethical principles and standards for developmental scientists. https://www.srcd.org/sites/default/files/file-attachments/SRCDethicalprinciplesstandardsfordevsci_3.2021.pdf
Strassberg, D. S., Cann, D., & Velarde, V. (2017). Sexting by high school students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0926-9
Thomas, S. E. (2018). “What should I do?”: Young women’s reported dilemmas with nude photographs. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 15(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0310-0
Van Ouytsel, J., Lu, Y., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Temple, J. R. (2019). Longitudinal associations between sexting, cyberbullying, and bullying among adolescents: Cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 73, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.03.008
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Lu, Y., Temple, J. R., & Ponnet, K. (2018). The associations between substance use, sexual behavior, deviant behaviors and adolescents’ engagement in sexting: Does relationship context matter? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(11), 2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0903-9
Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Heirman, W. (2015). The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behaviour: Integrative review. Journal of School Nursing, 31(1), 54–69
Ybarra, M. L., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Friend, J., & Diener-West, M. (2009). Impact of asking sensitive questions about violence to children and adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(5), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.009
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94
Funding
This study was funded by the Fordham University Center for Ethics Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by XT and EB. The first draft of the article was written by XT and EB, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study has been approved by the Fordham University Institutional Review Boards and conforms to all federal and APA Ethics Code Research Guidelines.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tao, X., Bragard, E. & Fisher, C.B. Risks and Benefits of Adolescent Girls’ Participation in Online Sexting Survey Research. Arch Sex Behav 50, 2335–2346 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02003-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02003-x