Skip to main content

Table 2 Model results predicting active and passive sexting

From: A Social-Ecological Approach to Understanding Adolescent Sexting Behavior

Variable Passive sexting Active sexting
  b (SE) 95%CI Sig β1 b (SE) 95%CI Sig βa
Age 0.17 (0.02) 0.13, 0.20  < .001 .19 0.05 (0.01) 0.03, 0.07  < .001 .13
Sexb 0.43 (0.03) 0.37, 0.49  < .001 .28 0.03 (0.01) − 0.00, 0.05 .070 .04
Ethnicityc − 0.05 (0.07) − 0.18, 0.08 .418 − .02 − 0.03 (0.02) − 0.07, 0.02 .197 − .02
MVP statusd 0.05 (0.03) − 0.01, 0.11 .087 .03 0.04 (0.01) 0.01, 0.06 .009 .05
SC − 0.14 (0.02) − 0.18, − 0.10  < .001 − .14 − 0.02 (0.01) − 0.04, − 0.00 .040 − .05
PLS − 0.13 (0.03) − 0.19, − 0.07  < .001 − .09 − 0.05 (0.02) − 0.08, − 0.02 .003 − .08
PPP 0.07 (0.04) − 0.01, 0.15 .096 .04 0.03 (0.02) − 0.01, 0.08 .206 .04
PRP 0.35 (0.05) 0.27, 0.43  < .001 .19 0.11 (0.03) 0.06, 0.16  < .001 .13
SCxPPP 0.06 (0.04) − − 0.02, 0.14 .188 .03 0.05 (0.03) − 0.01, 0.11 .107 .05
SCxPRP − 0.05 (0.04) − 0.13, 0.03 .266 − .02 0.01 (0.03) − 0.05, 0.08 .672 .02
PLSxPPP − 0.04 (0.06) − 0.16, 0.09 .563 − .01 0.03 (0.05) − 0.06, 0.12 .537 .02
PLSxPRP − 0.02 (0.06) − 0.15, 0.08 .564 − .01 0.02 (0.05) − 0.06, 0.11 .606 .02
  1. Note. SC = school connectedness; PLS = parental love and support; PPP = perceived susceptibility to peer-pressure; PRP = perceived susceptibility to romantic-pressure
  2. aSTDYX standardized results are reported
  3. bSex is coded as 1 = Boy, 2 = Girl
  4. cEthnicity is coded as 1 = White, 2 = Not White
  5. dMVP status coded 0 = Non-MVP, 1 = MVP