An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior

Abstract

Researchers have highlighted numerous sociocultural factors that have been shown to underpin human appearance enhancement practices, including the influence of peers, family, the media, and sexual objectification. Fewer scholars have approached appearance enhancement from an evolutionary perspective or considered how sociocultural factors interact with evolved psychology to produce appearance enhancement behavior. Following others, we argue that evidence from the field of evolutionary psychology can complement existing sociocultural models by yielding unique insight into the historical and cross-cultural ubiquity of competition over aspects of physical appearance to embody what is desired by potential mates. An evolutionary lens can help to make sense of reliable sex and individual differences that impact appearance enhancement, as well as the context-dependent nature of putative adaptations that function to increase physical attractiveness. In the current review, appearance enhancement is described as a self-promotion strategy used to enhance reproductive success by rendering oneself more attractive than rivals to mates, thereby increasing one’s mate value. The varied ways in which humans enhance their appearance are described, as well as the divergent tactics used by women and men to augment their appearance, which correspond to the preferences of opposite-sex mates in a heterosexual context. Evolutionarily relevant individual differences and contextual factors that vary predictably with appearance enhancement behavior are also discussed. The complementarity of sociocultural and evolutionary perspectives is emphasized and recommended avenues for future interdisciplinary research are provided for scholars interested in studying appearance enhancement behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abed, R. T. (1998). The sexual competition hypothesis for eating disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71(4), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1998.tb01007.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abed, R., Mehta, S., Figueredo, A. J., Aldridge, S., Balson, H., Meyer, C., & Palmer, R. (2012). Eating disorders and intrasexual competition: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis among young women. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/290813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Achorn, A. M., & Rosenthal, G. G. (2020). It’s not about him: Mismeasuring ‘good genes’ in sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 35, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aiache, A. E. (1991). Male chest correction. Pectoral implants and gynecomastia. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 18(4), 823–828.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, M. W., Bettinger, R. L., Codding, B. F., Jones, T. L., & Schwitalla, A. W. (2016). Resource scarcity drives lethal aggression among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in central California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(43), 12120–12125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607996113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ames, M., & Burcon, S. (2016). How pop culture shapes the stages of a woman’s life: From toddlers-in-tiaras to cougars-on-the-prowl. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson-Fye, E. P. (2012). Anthropological perspectives on physical appearance and body image. In T. Cash (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (pp. 15–22). Cambridge, England: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson, M. B. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature, 299(5886), 818–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/299818a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnocky, S. (2016). Intrasexual rivalry among women. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1424-1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arnocky, S. (2018). Self-perceived mate value, facial attractiveness, and mate preferences: Do desirable men want it all? Evolutionary Psychology, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918763271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnocky, S., Bird, B. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). An evolutionary perspective on characteristics of physical attractiveness in humans. In A. Rennolds (Ed.), Psychology of interpersonal perception and relationships (pp. 115–155). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arnocky, S., Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Ouellette, D., & Albert, G. (2018). Do men with more masculine voices have better immunocompetence? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-015-0037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: The mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5, 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.510132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnocky, S., Proietti, V., Ruddick, E. L., Côté, T. R., Ortiz, T. L., Hodson, G., & Carré, J. M. (2019). Aggression toward sexualized women is mediated by decreased perceptions of humanness. Psychological Science, 30(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619836106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behavior. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arnqvist, G. (2006). Sensory exploitation and sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1466), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arthur, L. C., Brooks, R. C., & Blake, K. H. (2020). Female self-sexualization covaries with mate value but not mate availability. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00133-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017). Consideration of cosmetic surgery as part of women’s benefit-provisioning mate retention strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Atari, M., Chegeni, R., & Fathi, L. (2017). Women who are interested in cosmetic surgery want it all: The association between considering cosmetic surgery and women’s mate preferences. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0053-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Atari, M., & Jamali, R. (2016). Mate preferences in young Iranian women: Cultural and individual difference correlates. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(4), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0060-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bajos, N., Wellings, K., Laborde, C., & Moreau, C. (2010). Sexuality and obesity, a gender perspective: Results from French national random probability survey of sexual behaviours. British Medical Journal, 340, c2573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker, M. D., Jr., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bakhshi, S. (2011). Women’s body image and the role of culture: A review of the literature. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v7i2.135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barber, N. (2003). The sex ratio and female marital opportunity as historical predictors of violent crime in England, Scotland, and the United States. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103254011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barlett, C. P., Vowels, C. L., & Saucier, D. A. (2008). Meta-analyses of the effects of media images on men’s body-image concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Batres, C., Kramer, S. S., DeAngelis, C. G., & Russell, R. (2019). Examining the ‘cosmetics placebo effect’. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Batres, C., Porcheron, A., Kaminski, G., Courrèges, S., Morizot, F., & Russell, R. (2018). Evidence that the hormonal contraceptive pill is associated with cosmetic habits. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018). Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 166–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0048-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Belanger, J., Temblay, C., Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2019). Luteinizing hormone. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes Shackelford (Eds.), The encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1812-1.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bendixen, M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2015). Revisiting judgment of strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation tactics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(8), 1056–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514558959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bereczkei, T., & Meskó, N. (2006). Hair length, facial attractiveness, personality attribution: A multiple fitness model of hairdressing. Review of Psychology, 13(1), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bielert, C., & Anderson, C. M. (1985). Baboon sexual swellings and male response: A possible operational mammalian supernormal stimulus and response interaction. International Journal of Primatology, 6(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bilal, A., Tilahun, Z., Shimels, T., Gelan, Y., & Osman, E. (2016). Cosmetics utilization practice in Jigjiga Town, Eastern Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. Cosmetics, 3(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics3040040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Perceptions of low agency and high sexual openness mediate the relationship between sexualization and sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42(5), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., & Brooks, R. C. (2018a). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35), 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(50), 25029–25033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909806116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Blake, K. R., Brooks, R., Arthur, L. C., & Denson, T. F. (2020). In the context of romantic attraction, beautification can increase assertiveness in women. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0229162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Blake, K. R., Fourati, M., & Brooks, R. C. (2018b). Who suppresses female sexuality? An examination of support for Islamic veiling in a secular Muslim democracy as a function of sex and offspring sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bleske-Rechek, A., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Sexual strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2019a). Gendered products act as the extended phenotype of human sexual dimorphism: They increase physical attractiveness and desirability. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2019b). The imaginary intrasexual competition: Advertisements featuring provocative female models trigger women to engage in indirect aggression. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3643-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Borgia, G. (1993). The cost of display in the non-resource-based mating system of the satin bowerbird. The American Naturalist, 141(5), 729–743.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52(9–10), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3731-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bovet, J. (2019). Evolutionary theories and men’s preferences for women’s waist-to-hip ratio: Which hypotheses remain? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Bradshaw, H. K., Leyva, R. P., Nicolas, S. C., & Hill, S. E. (2019). Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: The case of cosmetic surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Brewer, G., & Hamilton, V. (2014). Female mate retention, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0097245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Broadstock, M., Borland, R., & Gason, R. (1992). Effects of suntan on judgements of healthiness and attractiveness by adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01527.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brommer, J. E., Ahola, K., & Karstinen, T. (2005). The colour of fitness: Plumage coloration and lifetime reproductive success in the tawny owl. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1566), 935–940. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Broussard, K. A., & Harton, H. C. (2018). Tattoo or taboo? Tattoo stigma and negative attitudes toward tattooed individuals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(5), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1373622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brown, G. R., & Richerson, P. J. (2014). Applying evolutionary theory to human behaviour: Past differences and current debates. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-013-9166-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Buss, D. M. (1996). Sexual conflict: Evolutionary insights into feminism and the “battle of the sexes”. In D. M. Buss & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 296–318). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 955–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Buss, D. M. (2017). Sexual conflict in human mating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417695559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590073006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1999). Interactionism, flexibility, and inferences about the past. American Psychologist, 54(6), 443–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of American mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00491.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Butler, S. M., Smith, N. K., Collazo, E., Caltabiano, L., & Herbenick, D. (2015). Pubic hair preferences, reasons for removal, and associated genital symptoms: Comparisons between men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Cafri, G., Thompson, J. K., Roehrig, M., Rojas, A., Sperry, S., Jacobsen, P. B., & Hillhouse, J. (2008). Appearance motives to tan and not tan: Evidence for validity and reliability of a new scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9022-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cafri, G., Yamamiya, Y., Brannick, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 12(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpi053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Cai, Z., Hahn, A. C., Zhang, W., Holzleitner, I. J., Lee, A. J., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). No evidence that facial attractiveness, femininity, averageness, or coloration are cues to susceptibility to infectious illnesses in a university sample of young adult women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cantú, S. M., Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Weisberg, Y. J., Durante, K. M., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Fertile and selectively flirty women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 25(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Carmen, R. A., Guitar, A. E., & Dillon, H. M. (2012). Ultimate answers to proximate questions: The evolutionary motivations behind tattoos and body piercings in popular culture. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Cash, T. F. (1990). Losing hair, losing points? The effects of male pattern baldness on social impression formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00404.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1989). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 129(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9712051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Cash, T. F., Morrow, J. A., Hrabosky, J. I., & Perry, A. A. (2004). How has body image changed? A cross-sectional investigation of college women and men from 1983 to 2001. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Cash, T. F., Novy, P. L., & Grant, J. R. (1994). Why do women exercise? Factor analysis and further validation of the reasons for exercise inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Chang, L., Wang, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Chaudhri, S. K., & Jain, N. K. (2009). History of cosmetics. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics, 3(3), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.22377/ajp.v3i3.260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Cho, S., & Workman, J. E. (2014). Relationships among gender, fashion leadership, need for affect, and consumers’ apparel shopping preference. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Chung, V. Q., Gordon, J. S., Veledar, E., & Chen, S. C. (2010). Hot or not—Evaluating the effect of artificial tanning on the public’s perception of attractiveness. Dermatologic Surgery, 36(11), 1651–1655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01713.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318(5858), 1882–1885. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour, 77(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Coley, A., & Burgess, B. (2003). Gender differences in cognitive and affective impulse buying. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020310484834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Craig, L. K., & Gray, P. B. (2019). Pubic hair removal practices in cross-cultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 53(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397118799298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Creinin, M. D., Keverline, S., & Meyn, L. A. (2004). How regular is regular? An analysis of menstrual cycle regularity. Contraception, 70(4), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: Some thoughts and clarifications. Social Science Information, 44(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Cunningham, M. R., Druen, P. B., & Barbee, A. P. (1997). Angels, mentors, and friends: Trade-offs among evolutionary, social, and individual variables in physical appearance. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 109–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Daly, M. (2017). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. In J. A. French, A. C. Kamil, & D. W. Leger (Eds.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation. Evolutionary psychology and motivation (Vol. 47, pp. 1–36). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Davis, A. C. (2020). Resolving the tension between feminism and evolutionary psychology: An epistemological critique. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Sex differences in the initiation of gossip. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes Shackelford (Eds.), The encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 75–91). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Davis, A. C., Vaillancourt, T., Arnocky, S., & Doyle, R. (2019). Gossip and reputation management: An evolutionary approach to sex differences in discrimination. In F. Giardini & R. Wittek (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gossip and reputation (pp. 303–321). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype (revi.ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  104. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Delinsky, S. S., & Wilson, G. T. (2008). Weight gain, dietary restraint, and disordered eating in the freshman year of college. Eating Behaviors, 9(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. DelPriore, D. J., Bradshaw, H. K., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Appearance enhancement produces a strategic beautification penalty among women. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. DelPriore, D. J., Prokosch, M. L., & Hill, S. E. (2017). The causes and consequences of women’s competitive beautification. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 577–596). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  108. DeMaria, A. L., & Berenson, A. B. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income Hispanic, Black, and White women. Body Image, 10(2), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Deter-Wolf, A., Robitaille, B., Krutak, L., & Galliot, S. (2016). The world’s oldest tattoos. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 5, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Dettwyler, C. (2011). Cultural anthropology & human experience: The feast of life. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Diamond, J. M. (1998). Why is sex fun? The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2002). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 829–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2013). The role of facial hair in women’s perceptions of men’s attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Dixson, A. F., Halliwell, G., East, R., Wignarajah, P., & Anderson, M. J. (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021889228469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Dixson, B. J., & Rantala, M. J. (2016). The role of facial and body hair distribution in women’s judgments of men’s sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0588-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Dixson, B. J., Rantala, M. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for men’s body hair. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-019-0107-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Dixson, B. J., & Vasey, P. L. (2012). Beards augment perceptions of men’s age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness. Behavioral Ecology, 23(3), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9680-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Dubbs, S. L., Kelly, A. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2017). Ravishing rivals: Female intrasexual competition and cosmetic surgery. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 597–616). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Dunn, M. J., & Searle, R. (2010). Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X417319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Durante, K. M., & Griskevicius, V. (2016). Evolution and consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Durante, K. M., & Griskevicius, V. (2018). Evolution and consumer psychology. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Eberle, M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2004). Selected polyandry: Female choice and inter-sexual conflict in a small nocturnal solitary primate (Microcebus murinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0823-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Elflein, J. (2019). Cosmetic surgeryStatistics and facts. Statista. Retrieved April 16, 2020, https://www.statista.com/topics/3734/cosmetic-surgery/.

  129. Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300), 215–223.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Anchor.

  131. Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025656.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Fernandez, A. M., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., & Dufey, M. (2014). BMI, age, mate value, and intrasexual competition in Chilean women. Current Psychology, 33(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9221-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 11(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Fink, B., Liebner, K., Müller, A. K., Hirn, T., McKelvey, G., & Lankhof, J. (2018). Hair colour and skin colour together influence perceptions of age, health and attractiveness in lightly pigmented young women. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 40(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Fink, B., & Neave, N. (2005). The biology of facial beauty. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 27(6), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.2005.00286.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Finner, A. M. (2013). Nutrition and hair: Deficiencies and supplements. Dermatologic Clinics, 31(1), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2012.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2011). Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates. Personal Relationships, 18, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01307.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Fisher, M., Cox, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). Self-promotion versus competitor derogation: The influence of sex and romantic relationship status on intrasexual competition strategy selection. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.4.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Fisher, M. L., Tran, U. S., & Voracek, M. (2008). The influence of relationship status, mate seeking, and sex on intrasexual competition. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(4), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.4.493-512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Fiske, L., Fallon, E. A., Blissmer, B., & Redding, C. A. (2014). Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States adults: Review and recommendations for future research. Eating Behaviors, 15(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. The American Naturalist, 139(3), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1086/285346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Foo, Y. Z., Nakagawa, S., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2017). The effects of sex hormones on immune function: A meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 92(1), 551–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). The relationship between health and mating success in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 4(1), 160603. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Frederick, D. A., Buchanan, G. M., Sadehgi-Azar, L., Peplau, L. A., Haselton, M. G., Berezovskaya, A., & Lipinski, R. E. (2007a). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Frederick, D. A., & Essayli, J. H. (2016). Male body image: The roles of sexual orientation and body mass index across five national US studies. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Frederick, D. A., Forbes, G. B., & Anna, B. (2008). Female body dissatisfaction and perceptions of the attractive female body in Ghana, the Ukraine, and the United States. Psihologijske Teme, 17(2), 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Frederick, D. A., & Jenkins, B. N. (2015). Height and body mass on the mating market: Associations with number of sex partners and extra-pair sex among heterosexual men and women aged 18–65. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915604563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Frederick, D. A., Lever, J., & Peplau, L. A. (2007b). Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: Views of men and women across the lifespan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(5), 1407–1415.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Gadalla, T., & Piran, N. (2007). Co-occurrence of eating disorders and alcohol use disorders in women: A meta analysis. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 10(4), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-007-0184-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Galbarczyk, A., & Ziomkiewicz, A. (2017). Tattooed men: Healthy bad boys and good-looking competitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Frederick, D. A. (2010). The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 14(3), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Gambla, W. C., Fernandez, A. M., Gassman, N. R., Tan, M. C., & Daniel, C. L. (2017). College tanning behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, and intentions: A systematic review of the literature. Preventive Medicine, 105, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Simpson, J. A. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1702_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–195). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Gilbert, R., & Uetz, G. W. (2016). Courtship and male ornaments as honest indicators of immune function. Animal Behaviour, 117, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Gintis, H. (2011). Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1566), 878–888. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Glassenberg, A. N., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010). Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(6), 1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9559-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Goodin, S. M., Van Denburg, A., Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). “Putting on” sexiness: A content analysis of the presence of sexualizing characteristics in girls’ clothing. Sex Roles, 65(1–2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9966-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Gosse, D., & Arnocky, S. (2012). The state of Canadian boyhood—beyond literacy to a holistic approach. In Education, 18(2), 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Grammer, K., Fink, B., Juette, A., Ronzal, G., & Thornhill, R. (2002). Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Advances in visual cognition: Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 91–125). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: A cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Gray, R. D., Heaney, M., & Fairhall, S. (2003). Evolutionary psychology and the challenge of adaptive explanation. In K. Sterelny & J. Fitness (Eds.), From mating to mentality: Evaluating evolutionary psychology (pp. 247–268). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Grogan, S. (2008). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. Milton Park, England: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Guéguen, N. (2012a). Tattoos, piercings, and sexual activity. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.9.1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Guéguen, N. (2012b). Hair color and courtship: Blond women received more courtship solicitations and redhead men received more refusals. Psychological Studies, 57(4), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-012-0158-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Guéguen, N. (2012c). Makeup and menstrual cycle: Near ovulation, women use more cosmetics. Psychological Record, 62(3), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Guéguen, N. (2013). Effects of a tattoo on men’s behavior and attitudes towards women: An experimental field study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0104-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Gurung, R. A., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Haiyan, H., & Jasper, C. (2004). Men and women: A comparison of shopping mall behavior. Journal of Shopping Center Research, 11(1–2), 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science, 218(4570), 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Hardon, A., Idrus, N. I., & Hymans, T. D. (2013). Chemical sexualities: The use of pharmaceutical and cosmetic products by youth in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(41), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41709-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Harden, A. J., Butler, S., & Scheetz, M. (1998). Body perceptions of bulimic and nonbulimic groups. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(1), 108–110. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Hargreaves, D., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). The effect of “thin ideal” television commercials on body dissatisfaction and schema activation during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(5), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024974015581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Hargreaves, D. A., & Tiggemann, M. (2006). ‘Body image is for girls’: A qualitative study of boys’ body image. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105306065017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  190. Harris, D. L., & Carr, A. T. (2001). Prevalence of concern about physical appearance in the general population. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 54(3), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2001.3550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Harris, M., Dunn, M., & Alwyn, T. (2017). Intrasexual competition as a potential influence on anabolic-androgenic steroid use initiation. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(9), 1210–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317692145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Havlíček, J., Cobey, K. D., Barrett, L., Klapilová, K., & Roberts, S. C. (2015). The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm. Behavioral Ecology, 26(5), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., … Varella, M. A. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Hennighausen, C., Hudders, L., Lange, B. P., & Fink, H. (2016). What if the rival drives a Porsche? Luxury car spending as a costly signal in male intrasexual competition. Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916678217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Henrich, J. (2011). A cultural species: How culture drove human evolution. Psychological Science Agenda, 25(11), 1169–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Herbenick, D., Hensel, D., Smith, N. K., Schick, V., Reece, M., Sanders, S. A., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2013). Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: Findings from a prospective daily diary study of sexually active women in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(3), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  199. Herbenick, D., Schick, V., Reece, M., Sanders, S., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: Prevalence, methods, and characteristics. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(10), 3322–3330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01935.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  200. Hill, G. E. (1990). Female house finches prefer colourful males: Sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Animal Behaviour, 40, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80537-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210395603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  202. Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  203. Hinsz, V. B., Matz, D. C., & Patience, R. A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Holland, E., & Haslam, N. (2013). Worth the weight: The objectification of overweight versus thin targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312474800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Holliday, R., & Cairnie, A. (2007). Man-made plastic: Investigating men’s consumption of aesthetic surgery. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507073508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Hudders, L., De Backer, C., Fisher, M., & Vyncke, P. (2014). The rival wears Prada: Luxury consumption as a female competition strategy. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  208. Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Hughes, K. A., Houde, A. E., Price, A. C., & Rodd, F. H. (2013). Mating advantage for rare males in wild guppy populations. Nature, 503(7474), 108–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  210. Hunt, K. A., Fate, J., & Dodds, B. (2011). Cultural and social influences on the perception of beauty: A case analysis of the cosmetics industry. Journal of Business Case Studies. https://doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v7i1.1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. Husak, J. F., & Swallow, J. G. (2011). Compensatory traits and the evolution of male ornaments. Behaviour, 148, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579510X541265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. IBISWorld. (2020). Tanning salons in the US market size 20052025. Retrieved April 17, 2020, https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/tanning-salons-united-states/.

  213. International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ISAPS). (2019). ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2018. Retrieved April 17, 2020, https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ISAPS-Global-Survey-Results-2018-new.pdf.

  214. Islam, P. S., Chang, C., Selmi, C., Generali, E., Huntley, A., Teuber, S. S., & Gershwin, M. E. (2016). Medical complications of tattoos: A comprehensive review. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, 50(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-016-8532-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  215. Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2014). Negative frequency-dependent preferences and variation in male facial hair. Biology Letters, 10(4), 20130958. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  216. Janif, Z. J., Brooks, R. C., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). Are preferences for women’s hair color frequency-dependent? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-014-0008-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  217. Jirotkul, M. (1999). Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male–male competition in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 58(2), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  218. Johnsen, L. L., & Geher, G. (2017). Fashion as a set of signals in female intrasexual competition. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 637–653). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Jokela, M. (2009). Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(5), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  220. Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., … Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 723–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., Watkins, C. D., Fincher, C. L., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2013). Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies. Behavioral Ecology, 24(2), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2019). Ovulation, sex hormones, and women’s mating psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  223. Jones, A. L., & Kramer, R. S. S. (2016). Facial cosmetics and attractiveness: Comparing the effect sizes of professionally-applied cosmetics and identity. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  224. Jones, A. L., Kramer, R. S., & Ward, R. (2014). Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(10), 2060–2068. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.908932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Ward, R. (2015). Cosmetics Alter biologically-based factors of beauty: Evidence from facial contrast. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 147470491501300. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  226. Julian, A. K., Bethel, J. W., Odden, M. C., & Thorburn, S. (2016). Sex differences and risk behaviors among indoor tanners. Preventive Medicine Reports, 3, 283–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  227. Kamble, S., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Indian mate preferences: Continuity, sex differences, and cultural change across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  228. Katrodia, A., Naude, M. J., & Soni, S. (2018). Consumer buying behavior at shopping malls: Does gender matter? Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i1.2095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  229. Kellie, D., Blake, K., & Brooks, R. (2020). Behind the makeup: The effects of cosmetics on women’s self-objectification, and their objectification by others. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SZBKV.

  230. Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A., & Brown, S. (1995). Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  231. Kilpatrick, M., Hebert, E., & Bartholomew, J. (2005). College students’ motivation for physical activity: Differentiating men’s and women’s motives for sport participation and exercise. Journal of American College Health, 54(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.54.2.87-94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  232. Kim, E.-Y., & Kim, Y.-K. (2004). Predicting online purchase intentions for clothing products. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410539302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  233. Knoesen, N., Thai Vo, S., & Castle, D. (2009). To be superman-the male looks obsession. Australian Family Physician, 38(3), 131–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  234. Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(4), 919–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  235. Kokko, H., & Johnstone, R. A. (2002). Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles, and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 357(1419), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  236. Kościński, K. (2013). Attractiveness of women’s body: Body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance. Behavioral Ecology, 24(4), 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. Koziel, S., Kretschmer, W., & Pawlowski, B. (2010). Tattoo and piercing as signals of biological quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. Krems, J. A., Rankin, A. M., & Northover, S. B. (2019). Women’s strategic defenses against same-sex aggression: Evidence from sartorial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619882028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. Kruger, D. J. (2008). Male financial consumption is associated with higher mating intentions and mating success. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  240. Kruger, D., & Byker, D. (2009). Evolved foraging psychology underlies sex differences in shopping experiences and behaviors. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. Krutak, L. (2015). The cultural heritage of tattooing: A brief history. In J. Serup, N. Kluger, & W. Bäumler (Eds.), Tattooed skin and health (pp. 1–5). Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Kunst, A. (2019). Frequency of grooming chest hair among male U.S. consumers 2017, by age group. Statista. Retrieved May 1, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/724750/chest-hair-grooming-frequency-men-us-age/.

  243. Kvarnemo, C., & Forsgren, E. (2000). The influence of potential reproductive rate and variation in mate quality on male and female choosiness in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48(5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  244. Laidre, M. E., & Johnstone, R. A. (2013). Animal signals. Current Biology, 23(18), 829–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  245. Laland, K., Matthews, B., & Feldman, M. W. (2016). An introduction to niche construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology, 30(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9821-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  246. Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science, 334(6062), 1512–1516.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  247. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  248. Lee, K. S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2018). Developmental pathways between peer victimization, psychological functioning, disordered eating behavior, and body mass index: A review and theoretical model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  249. Lee, A. J., & Zietsch, B. P. (2011). Experimental evidence that women’s mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity. Biology Letters, 7(6), 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  250. Lee, A. J., & Zietsch, B. P. (2015). Women’s pathogen disgust predicting preference for facial masculinity may be specific to age and study design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. Lefevre, C. E., Ewbank, M. P., Calder, A. J., von dem Hagen, E., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). It is all in the face: Carotenoid skin coloration loses attractiveness outside the face. Biology Letters, 9(6), 20130633. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  252. Lei, X., & Perrett, D. (2020). Misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences for thinness and muscularity. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Lefevre, C. E., & Perrett, D. I. (2015). Fruit over sunbed: Carotenoid skin colouration is found more attractive than melanin colouration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.944194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  254. Leit, R. A., Pope, H. G., Jr., & Gray, J. J. (2001). Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: The evolution of Playgirl centerfolds. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1%3c90:AID-EAT15%3e3.0.CO;2-F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  255. Lennon, S. J. (1990). Effects of clothing attractiveness on perceptions. Home Economics Research Journal, 18(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X9001800403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  256. Lennon, S. J., Adomaitis, A. D., Koo, J., & Johnson, K. K. (2017). Dress and sex: A review of empirical research involving human participants and published in refereed journals. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0101-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  257. Lennon, S. J., & Rudd, N. A. (1994). Linkages between attitudes toward gender roles, body satisfaction, self-esteem, and appearance management behaviors in women. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23(2), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X94232002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  258. Leve, M., Rubin, L., & Pusic, A. (2012). Cosmetic surgery and neoliberalisms: Managing risk and responsibility. Feminism & Psychology, 22(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511424361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  259. Lewis, D. M., Russell, E. M., Al-Shawaf, L., Ta, V., Senveli, Z., Ickes, W., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Why women wear high heels: Evolution, lumbar curvature, and attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01875.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  260. Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  261. Li, N. P., Smith, A. R., Griskevicius, V., Cason, M. J., & Bryan, A. (2010). Intrasexual competition and eating restriction in heterosexual and homosexual individuals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  262. Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  263. Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J., Valentine, K. A., … Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  264. Liesen, L. (2013). The tangled web she weaves. In M. L. Fisher, J. R. Garcia, & R. Sokol-Chang (Eds.), Evolution’s empress: Darwinian perspectives on the nature of women (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: An examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  266. Little, A. C. (2014). Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(6), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  267. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2032–2039. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  268. Liu, W. Y., Lin, C. C., Lee, Y. S., & Deng, D. J. (2013). On gender differences in consumer behavior for online financial transaction of cosmetics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(1–2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  269. Locke, A., & Arnocky, S. (2020). Eating disorders. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds). Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_696-1.

  270. Locke, A., Desrochers, J., & Arnocky, S. (2020). Induced mate abundance increases women’s expectations for engagement ring size and cost. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00214-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  271. Loughnan, S., Baldissarri, C., Spaccatini, F., & Elder, L. (2017). Internalizing objectification: Objectified individuals see themselves as less warm, competent, moral, and human. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  272. Ludvico, L. R., & Kurland, J. A. (1995). Symbolic or not-so-symbolic wounds: The behavioral ecology of human scarification. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)00075-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  273. Luoto, S. (2019). An updated theoretical framework for human sexual selection: From ecology, genetics, and life history to extended phenotypes. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5(1), 48–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0103-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. Lynn, C. D., Dominguez, J. T., & DeCaro, J. A. (2016). Tattooing to “toughen up”: Tattoo experience and secretory immunoglobulin A. American Journal of Human Biology, 28(5), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  275. Lynn, C. D., Howells, M., Herdrich, D., Ioane, J., Hudson, D., & Fitiao, S. T. U. (2019). The evolutionary adaptation of body art: Tattooing as costly honest signaling of enhanced immune response in American Samoa. American Journal of Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., de Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  277. Maner, J. K., & Ackerman, J. M. (2020). Ecological sex ratios and human mating. Trends in Cognitive Science, 24, 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  278. Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). Hair today, gone tomorrow: A comparison of body hair removal practices in gay and heterosexual men. Body Image, 5(3), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  279. McCabe, M. P., Ricciardelli, L., Waqa, G., Goundar, R., & Fotu, K. (2009). Body image and body change strategies among adolescent males and females from Fiji, Tonga and Australia. Body Image, 6, 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  280. McIntosh, T. L., Lee, A. J., Sidari, M. J., Stower, R. E., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. (2017). Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women’s preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness? PLoS ONE, 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178206.

  281. Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Men still value physical attractiveness in a long-term mate more than women: Rejoinder to Eastwick, Neff, Finkel, Luchies, and Hunt (2014). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  282. Meskó, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displaying phenotypic quality. Human Nature, 15(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1008-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  283. Mesoudi, A. (2016). Cultural evolution: Integrating psychology, evolution and culture. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  284. Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2009). Why women have sex: The psychology of sex in women’s own voices. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  285. Mikulic, M. (2018). Global cosmetic surgery and procedures market 2016 vs. 2026. Statista. Retrieved April 16, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/939420/cosmetic-surgery-and-procedures-market-worldwide/.

  286. Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  287. Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. B. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–129). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  288. Miller, G. (2009). Spent: Sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Mintel. (2004). Underwear retailing. London: Mintel.

    Google Scholar 

  290. Mogilski, J. K., Memering, S. L., Welling, L. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0658-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  291. Montemurro, B., & Gillen, M. (2013). How clothes make the woman immoral: Impressions given off by sexualized clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X13493128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  292. Montemurro, B., & Siefken, J. M. (2014). Cougars on the prowl? New perceptions of older women’s sexuality. Journal of Aging Studies, 28, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  293. Morin, A. J., Maïano, C., Scalas, L. F., Janosz, M., & Litalien, D. (2017). Adolescents’ body image trajectories: A further test of the self-equilibrium hypothesis. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1501–1521. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  294. Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  295. Mortazavi, S., & Poelker, K. E. (2017). Women in Iran. In C. Brown, U. Gielen, J. Gibbons, & J. Kuriansky (Eds.), Women’s evolving lives (pp. 73–90). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  296. Mosher, C. E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2005). Social predictors of sunscreen and self-tanning product use. Journal of American College Health, 54(3), 166–168. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.54.3.166-168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  297. Moss, J. H., & Maner, J. K. (2016). Biased sex ratios influence fundamental aspects of human mating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215612744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Motamedi, M. H. K., Ebrahimi, A., Shams, A., & Nejadsarvari, N. (2016). Health and social problems of rhinoplasty in Iran. World Journal of Plastic Surgery, 5(1), 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  299. Moule, K. R., & Fisher, M. (2015). You can look but you cannot touch: Male behaviors observed in lingerie stores. Human Ethology Bulletin, 29(4), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  300. Muggleton, N. K., & Fincher, C. L. (2017). Unrestricted sexuality promotes distinctive short-and long-term mate preferences in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  301. Murray, S. B., Griffiths, S., & Mond, J. M. (2016). Evolving eating disorder psychopathology: Conceptualising muscularity-oriented disordered eating. British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(5), 414–415. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.168427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  302. Muscarella, F., & Cunningham, M. R. (1996). The evolutionary significance and social perception of male pattern baldness and facial hair. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00130-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  303. Nayeri, D. (2014, October 8). The complicated beauty of the Persian nose. Vice. Retrieved May 5, 2020, https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/5gk7m8/shes-so-najoor-0000467-v21n10.

  304. Neave, N., & Shields, K. (2008). The effects of facial hair manipulation on female perceptions of attractiveness, masculinity, and dominance in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  305. Nettersheim, J., Gerlach, G., Herpertz, S., Abed, R., Figueredo, A. J., & Brüne, M. (2018). Evolutionary psychology of eating disorders: An explorative study in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02122.

  306. Nicolas, S. C., & Welling, L. L. (2017). Women’s acceptance of cosmetic surgery across the menstrual cycle. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  307. Nowak, J., Pawłowski, B., Borkowska, B., Augustyniak, D., & Drulis-Kawa, Z. (2018). No evidence for the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in male humans. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 7392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25694-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  308. Osterberg, E. C., Gaither, T. W., Awad, M. A., Truesdale, M. D., Allen, I., Sutcliffe, S., & Breyer, B. N. (2017). Correlation between pubic hair grooming and STIs: Results from a nationally representative probability sample. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-052687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  309. Otterbring, T., Ringler, C., Sirianni, N. J., & Gustafsson, A. (2018). The Abercrombie & Fitch effect: The impact of physical dominance on male customers’ status-signaling consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 55, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  310. Parmentier, M. A. (2016). High heels. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(6), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2016.1153830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  311. Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Pawłowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1416), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  313. Pawlowski, B., & Koziel, S. (2002). The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00092-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  314. Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios. Human Nature, 2(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  315. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  316. Pereira, K. J., da Silva, C. S. A., Havlíček, J., Kleisner, K., Varella, M. A. C., Pavlovič, O., & Valentova, J. V. (2019). Femininity–masculinity and attractiveness—Associations between self-ratings, third-party ratings and objective measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  317. Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking up romantic relationships: Costs experienced and coping strategies deployed. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600119.

  318. Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., & Buss, D. M. (2013). Women’s physical attractiveness and short-term mating strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  319. Pope, H. G., Jr., Olivardia, R., Gruber, A., & Borowiecki, J. (1999). Evolving ideals of male body image as seen through action toys. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199907)26:1%3c65:AID-EAT8%3e3.0.CO;2-D.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  320. Potter, W. J. (1993). Cultivation theory and research: A conceptual critique. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 564–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00313.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  321. Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., & Peterson, J. C. (2014). Adolescents’ reasons for tanning and appearance motives: A preliminary study. Body Image, 11(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  322. Prokop, P. (2016). Male preference for female pubic hair: An evolutionary view. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 73(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2016/0583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  323. Prokop, P., Rantala, M. J., & Fančovičová, J. (2012). Is plasticity in mating preferences adapted to perceived exposure to pathogens? Acta Ethologica, 15(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-011-0118-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  324. Prokop, P., & Švancárová, J. (2020). Wearing high heels as female mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  325. Provine, R. R., Cabrera, M. O., & Nave-Blodgett, J. (2013). Red, yellow, and super-white sclera. Human Nature, 24(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9168-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  326. Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world-and us. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  327. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  328. Rahman, O., Fung, B. C., Chen, Z., Chang, W. L., & Gao, X. (2018). A study of apparel consumer behaviour in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2017.1298158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  329. Ramsey, S., Sweeney, C., Fraser, M., & Oades, G. (2009). Pubic hair and sexuality: A review. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6(8), 2102–2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01307.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  330. Ramshida, A., & Manikandan, K. (2014). Cosmetic usage and its relation to sex, age, and marital status. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 3(3), 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  331. Randall, V. A. (2008). Androgens and hair growth. Dermatologic Therapy, 21(5), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2008.00214.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  332. Randazzo, K. D., & Solmon, M. (2018). Exploring social norms as a framework to understand decisions to be physically active. Quest, 70(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2017.1335646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  333. Rantala, M. J. (2007). Evolution of nakedness in Homo sapiens. Journal of Zoology, 273(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00295.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  334. Rantala, M. J., Pölkki, M., & Rantala, L. M. (2010). Preference for human male body hair changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause. Behavioral Ecology, 21(2), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  335. Read, B. (2011). Britney, Beyoncé, and me–primary school girls’ role models and constructions of the ‘popular’girl. Gender and Education, 23, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540251003674089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  336. Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  337. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  338. Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of the role of biopsychosocial factors in predicting body change strategies among adolescent boys. Sex Roles, 48(7–8), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022942614727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  339. Rodd, F. H., Hughes, K. A., Grether, G. F., & Baril, C. T. (2002). A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: Are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1490), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  340. Röder, S., Brewer, G., & Fink, B. (2009). Menstrual cycle shifts in women’s self-perception and motivation: A daily report method. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 616–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  341. Ross, R. (2008). Clothing: A global history. Cambridge, England: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  342. Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Figueredo, A. J. (1997). Mating-effort in adolescence: A conditional or alternative strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00005-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  343. Russell, R. (2011). Why cosmetics work. In R. B. Adams Jr., N. Ambady, K. Nakayama, & S. Shimojo (Eds.), The science of social vision (pp. 186–204). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  344. Russell, R., Batres, C., Courrèges, S., Kaminski, G., Soppelsa, F., Morizot, F., & Porcheron, A. (2019). Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  345. Ruxton, G. D., & Wilkinson, D. M. (2011). Thermoregulation and endurance running in extinct hominins: Wheeler’s models revisited. Journal of Human Evolution, 61(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  346. Saad, G. (2013). Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  347. Saad, G., & Peng, A. (2006). Applying Darwinian principles in designing effective intervention strategies: The case of sun tanning. Psychology & Marketing, 23(7), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  348. Saad, G., & Stenstrom, E. (2012). Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  349. Sabanoglu, T. (2019). Monthly amount consumers spend on clothing in the UK 2017, by gender. Statista. Retrieved April 16, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/984162/monthly-amount-consumers-spend-on-clothing-uk-by-gender/.

  350. Saito, S. (2017). Media exposure and thin-ideal internalization in the drive for thinness in Japanese women. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1224174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  351. Salmon, C. (2018). Evolutionary perspectives on popular culture: State of the art. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 2(2), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  352. Sandel, A. A. (2013). Brief communication: Hair density and body mass in mammals and the evolution of human hairlessness. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 152(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  353. Sarwer, D. B., Crerand, C. E., & Gibbons, L. M. (2007). Cosmetic procedures to enhance body shape and muscularity. In J. K. Thompson & G. Cafri (Eds.), The muscular ideal: Psychological, social, and medical perspectives (pp. 183–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  354. Schaedelin, F. C., & Taborsky, M. (2009). Extended phenotypes as signals. Biological Reviews, 84(2), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00075.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  355. Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., Calogero, R. M., Menzel, J. E., Krawczyk, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2018). Self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating: Testing a core mediational model of objectification theory among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Body Image, 24, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  356. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  357. Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2008). Self-perceived and observed variations in women’s attractiveness throughout the menstrual cycle—A diary study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  358. Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  359. Seeger, A. (1975). The meaning of body ornaments: A Suya example. Ethnology, 14(3), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  360. Segal, B., & Podoshen, J. S. (2013). An examination of materialism, conspicuous consumption and gender differences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01099.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  361. Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men’s bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  362. Seock, Y. K., & Bailey, L. R. (2008). The influence of college students’ shopping orientations and gender differences on online information searches and purchase behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00647.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  363. Shannon-Missal, L. (2016). Tattoo takeover: Three in ten Americans have tattoos, and most don’t stop at just one. The Harris Poll. Retrieved April 18, 2020, https://theharrispoll.com/tattoos-can-take-any-number-of-forms-from-animals-to-quotes-to-cryptic-symbols-and-appear-in-all-sorts-of-spots-on-our-bodies-some-visible-in-everyday-life-others-not-so-much-but-one-thi/.

  364. Sherrow, V. (2001). For appearance’ sake: The historical encyclopedia of good looks, beauty, and grooming. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  365. Sherrow, V. (2006). Encyclopedia of hair: A cultural history. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  366. Shomaker, L. B., & Furman, W. (2010). A prospective investigation of interpersonal influences on the pursuit of muscularity in late adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309350514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  367. Shuler, G. A., & McCord, D. M. (2010). Determinants of male attractiveness: “Hotness” ratings as a function of perceived resources. American Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  368. Shuster, S. M., & Wade, M. J. (2003). Mating systems and strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  369. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  370. Sinclair, R. D., English, D. R., & Giles, G. G. (2013). Are bald men more virile than their well thatched contemporaries? Medical Journal of Australia, 199(11), 811–812. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.11360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  371. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  372. Singh, N. (2018). An exploratory study on identification of age/occupation wise brand experience factors for lingerie buying consumers. International Journal of Costume and Fashion, 18(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2018.18.1.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  373. Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  374. Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  375. Skoda, K., Oswald, F., Brown, K., Hesse, C., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Showing skin: Tattoo visibility status, egalitarianism, and personality are predictors of sexual openness among women. Sexuality and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09729-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  376. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). Little girls in a grown up world: Exposure to sexualized media, internalization of sexualization messages, and body image in 6–9 year-old girls. Body Image, 18, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  377. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (2007). Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  378. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2011). Gender, self-objectification and pubic hair removal. Sex Roles, 65(7–8), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9922-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  379. Smolak, L., Murnen, S. K., & Myers, T. A. (2014). Sexualizing the self: What college women and men think about and do to be “sexy”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314524168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  380. Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018). The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation. Psychological Review, 125(5), 714–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  381. Snowdon, C. T., Ziegler, T. E., Schultz-Darken, N. J., & Ferris, C. F. (2006). Social odours, sexual arousal and pairbonding in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2079–2089. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  382. Sorokowski, P., Kościński, K., Sorokowska, A., & Huanca, T. (2014). Preference for women’s body mass and waist-to-hip ratio in Tsimané men of the Bolivian Amazon: Biological and cultural determinants. PLoS ONE, 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105468.

  383. Stankus, T. (2012). Reviews of science for science librarians: The evolutionary basis of human sexual attraction and competition for mates. Science & Technology Libraries, 31(3), 266–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2012.706187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  384. Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Mating effort. In P. Whelehan & A. Bolin (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of human sexuality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs290.

    Google Scholar 

  385. Statista. (2015). Share of United Kingdom adults with tattoos in 2015, by age. Retrieved April 18, 2020, https://www.statista.com/statistics/530572/tattoo-percentages-by-age-uk/.

  386. Steele, V. (2001). The corset: A cultural history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  387. Štěrbová, Z., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Tureček, P., Varella, M. A. C., & Valentova, J. V. (2018). Father’s physique influences mate preferences but not the actual choice of male somatotype in heterosexual women and homosexual men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  388. Stice, E., Spangler, D., & Agras, W. S. (2001). Exposure to media-portrayed thin-ideal images adversely affects vulnerable girls: A longitudinal experiment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.20.3.270.22309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  389. Stone, E. (2017). Do women compete for mates when men are scarce? Sex ratio imbalances and women’s mate competition cross-culturally. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 249–264). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  390. Stone, N., Graham, C. A., & Baysal, I. (2017). Women’s engagement in pubic hair removal: Motivations and associated factors. International Journal of Sexual Health, 29(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2016.1228727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  391. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Reasons for exercise and body esteem: Men’s responses to self-objectification. Sex Roles, 53(7), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7137-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  392. Sugiyama, L. S. (2005). Physical attractiveness in adaptationist perspective. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 292–343). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  393. Sugiyama, L. S. (2016). Physical attractiveness: An adaptationist perspective. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations (pp. 317–384). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  394. Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9974-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  395. Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  396. Swami, V. (2012). Written on the body? Individual differences between British adults who do and do not obtain a first tattoo. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(5), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00960.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  397. Swami, V., & Barrett, S. (2011). British men’s hair color preferences: An assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(6), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00911.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  398. Swami, V., Begum, S., & Petrides, K. V. (2010). Associations between trait emotional intelligence, actual–ideal weight discrepancy, and positive body image. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  399. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2007). Unattractive, promiscuous and heavy drinkers: Perceptions of women with tattoos. Body Image, 4(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  400. Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Joshi, K. (2008). The influence of skin tone, hair length, and hair colour on ratings of women’s physical attractiveness, health and fertility. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00651.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  401. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  402. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  403. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  404. Takács, K. (2018). Discounting of evolutionary explanations in sociology textbooks and curricula. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  405. Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2013). To let hair be, or to not let hair be? Gender and body hair removal practices in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Body Image, 10(4), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  406. Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2016). “I think gorilla-like back effusions of hair are rather a turn-off”: ‘Excessive hair’ and male body hair (removal) discourse. Body Image, 17, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  407. Thomas, A. G., Jonason, P. K., Blackburn, J., Kennair, L. E. O., Lowe, R., Malouff, J., … Li, N. P. (2020). Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Journal of Personality, 88, 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  408. Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., & Gold, J. A. (2013). Competitive orientations and women’s acceptance of cosmetic surgery. Psychology, 4(01), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.41009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  409. Tiggemann, M., & Hodgson, S. (2008). The hairlessness norm extended: Reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles, 59(11–12), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9494-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  410. Tiggemann, M., Martins, Y., & Churchett, L. (2008). Beyond muscles: Unexplored parts of men’s body image. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(8), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308095971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  411. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  412. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), 15011–15016. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705290104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  413. Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  414. Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(5), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(91)90030-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  415. Transparency Market Research. (2018). Global market for self-tanning products to expand at steady CAGR of 5.3% during 20172026, observes TMR. Retrieved April 17, 2020, https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/self-tanning-products-market.htm.

  416. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of Man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  417. Tsaousi, C., & Brewis, J. (2013). Are you feeling special today? Underwear and the ‘fashioning’ of female identity. Culture and Organization, 19(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2011.634196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  418. Tsarenko, Y., & Lo, C. J. (2017). A portrait of intimate apparel female shoppers: A segmentation study. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  419. Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious disease: Theoretical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3375–3388. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  420. Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  421. Uller, T. (2008). Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(8), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  422. Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  423. Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In S. M. Coyne & J. M. Ostrov (Eds.), The development of relational aggression (pp. 111–126). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  424. Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  425. Valentova, J. V., Bártová, K., Štěrbová, Z., & Varella, M. A. C. (2017a). Influence of sexual orientation, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect on preferences and choices for female buttock size, breast size and shape, and WHR. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  426. Valentova, J., Roberts, S. C., & Havlíček, J. (2013). Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: The role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. Perception, 42(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  427. Valentova, J. V., Stulp, G., Třebický, V., & Havlíček, J. (2014). Preferred and actual relative height among homosexual male partners vary with preferred dominance and sex role. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e86534. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  428. Valentova, J. V., Varella, M. A. C., Bártová, K., Štěrbová, Z., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2017b). Mate preferences and choices for facial and body hair in heterosexual women and homosexual men: Influence of sex, population, homogamy, and imprinting-like effect. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  429. VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2008). Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9139-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  430. Vandermassen, G. (2011). Evolution and rape: A feminist Darwinian perspective. Sex Roles, 64, 732–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9895-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  431. Varella, M. A. C., Santos, I. B. C., Ferreira, J. H. B. P., & Bussab, V. S. R. (2013). Misunderstandings in applying evolution to human mind and behavior and its causes: A systematic review. EvoS Journal: The Journal of the Evolutionary Studies Consortium, 5(1), 81–107.

    Google Scholar 

  432. Varella, M. A., Valentova, J. V., & Fernández, A. M. (2017). Evolution of artistic and aesthetic propensities through female competitive ornamentation. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 757–783). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  433. Vartanian, L. R., Wharton, C. M., & Green, E. B. (2012). Appearance vs. health motives for exercise and for weight loss. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  434. Wacker, S., Mobley, K., Forsgren, E., Myhre, L. C., de Jong, K., & Amundsen, T. (2013). Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish. Evolution, 67(7), 1937–1949. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  435. Waldersee, V. (2019). One in six women wear makeup at the gym. YouGov. Retrieved April 16, 2020. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2019/03/14/one-six-women-wear-makeup-gym.

  436. Walsh, A., & Yun, I. (2016). Evoked culture and evoked nature: The promise of gene-culture co-evolution theory for sociology. Frontiers in Sociology, 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  437. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  438. Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., … Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904154.

  439. Walters, S., & Crawford, C. B. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90025-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  440. Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834–854. https://doi.org/10.1086/673256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  441. Webb, H. J., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Waters, A. M., Farrell, L. J., Nesdale, D., & Downey, G. (2017). “Pretty pressure” from peers, parents, and the media: A longitudinal study of appearance-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27(4), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  442. Winegard, B. M., Winegard, B. M., & Deaner, R. O. (2014). Misrepresentations of evolutionary psychology in sex and gender textbooks. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 474–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  443. Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J., & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Modifying the body: Motivations for getting tattooed and pierced. Body Image, 4(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  444. Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J., Rammsayer, T., & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Differences in personality characteristics between body-modified and non-modified individuals: Associations with individual personality traits and their possible evolutionary implications. European Journal of Personality, 21(7), 931–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  445. Yeung, H., & Chen, S. C. (2016). Sexual orientation and indoor tanning device use: A population-based study. JAMA Dermatology, 152(1), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.2038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  446. Yoo, J., & Kim, H. (2014). Perceived negative health effect of tanning: The interface between tanning attitudes and behaviors. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 32(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X13510601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  447. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  448. Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  449. Zarzycki, M. Z., Słyk, S., Price, S., & Flaga-Łuczkiewicz, M. (2019). Men’s muscularity image—The role among Polish young population. Men and Masculinities, 22(2), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18774112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  450. Zietsch, B. P., Lee, A. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Jern, P. (2015). Variation in women’s preferences regarding male facial masculinity is better explained by genetic differences than by previously identified context-dependent effects. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615591770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  451. Zion Market Research. (2017). Cosmetic Products Market by Product (Skin care products, Haircare products, Color osmetics, Fragrances, Personal care products, and Oral care products), by Form (solutions, Creams, Lotions, Ointments, Suspensions, Tablets, Powders, Gels, Sticks, and Aerosols), by Application (Lips, Eyes, Eyebros, Nails, and Face), by Distribution Channel (Online, Beauty salons, Specialty stores, Direct selling, Departmental stores, Pharmacy, and Supermarkets), by Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa) – Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis and Forecast, 2017–2024. Retrieved April 17, 2020, https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/cosmetic-products-market.

  452. Zojaji, R., Keshavarzmanesh, M., Arshadi, H. R., Baf, M. M. F., & Esmaeilzadeh, S. (2014). Quality of life in patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Facial Plastic Surgery, 30(05), 593–596.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Arnocky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they had no conflict of interest for the current review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, A.C., Arnocky, S. An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior. Arch Sex Behav (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Physical attractiveness
  • Self-promotion
  • Appearance enhancement behavior
  • Mating effort
  • Evolutionary psychology