Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sexting: What’s Law Got to Do with It?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexting, the phenomenon commonly defined as the sending, receiving, and forwarding of nude, semi-nude, or sexually explicit images within digital forms of communication, is a practice that has received heightened public attention. While many scholars consider consensual sexting to be innocuous and a normative part of development, the potential for youth engagement to result in instances of cyberbullying, revenge porn, and child pornography has ignited public fear and anxiety, resulting in a messy patchwork of legal responses that often yield disproportionately punitive responses. Upon exploring the legal parameters surrounding youth sexting in Canada, this paper will argue that while the logic of the current legislation in protecting youth from harm is appropriate, its method of implementation is misguided. The legal reform advocated here calls upon child pornography and online harm laws only when the case involves an adult perpetrator, and suggests a more nuanced, graduated juvenile scheme when the behavior involves youth sexting participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. According to Cohen’s (1972) Folk Devils and Moral Panic, a moral panic occurs when “a condition, episode, person, or group of persons emerge to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests” (p. 9). For a phenomenon to be classified as a moral panic, Cohen (1972) argued that five essential principles must be satisfied: concern (i.e., a legitimate belief that the behavior has a negative effect on society), hostility (i.e., a clear division of an “us” versus “them” must be formed as hostility toward the behavior increases), consensus (i.e., widespread acceptance that the behavior poses a real threat to society), disproportionality (i.e., the solutions enforced must be seen as disproportionate to the actual threat posed), and volatility (i.e., moral panics are high unstable and tend to evaporate quickly).

  2. Twenty-two studies were from the U.S., 12 from Europe, 2 from Australia, 1 from Canada, 1 from South Africa, and 1 from South Korea. In addition, 18 studies examined sexting using mobile devices and computer, 6 studies examined sexting just using computers, 14 involved only mobile devices, and 1 provided insufficient information for determination.

References

  • A. H. v. State, 949 So. 2d 234 (Florida District Court of Appeal, 2007).

  • Ahern, N. R., & Mechling, B. (2013). Sexting: Serious problems for youth. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 51(7), 22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, M. (2018). Non-consensual disclosure of intimate images as a crime of gender-based violence. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 30(1), 117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, J. M. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in Internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45(2), 175–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breese-Vitelli, J. (2011). An exploration of sexting behavior among youth and the associated legal ramifications. Issues in Information Systems, 12(1), 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2011). An exploratory study of Internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: Has the Internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(1), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2014). Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: Toward a new explanatory framework. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfen, R. (2009). ‘It’s only a picture’: Sexting, ‘smutty’ snapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies, 24(3), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. S., Lee, S. S., & Lee, J. R. (2017). Mobile phone technology and online sexual harassment among juveniles in South Korea: Effects of self-control and social learning. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(1), 110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comartin, E., Kernsmith, R., & Kernsmith, P. (2013). “Sexting” and sex offender registration: Do age, gender, and sexual orientation matter? Deviant Behavior, 34(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7(1–2), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Code (R. S. C., 1985, c. C-46, s162.1).

  • Criminal Code (R. S. C., 1985, c. C-46, s163.1).

  • Crofts, T., & Lee, M. (2013). Sexting, children and child pornography. Sydney Law Review, 35(1), 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, T., Lee, M., McGovern, A., & Milivojevic, S. (2016). Sexting and young people. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antona, R., Kevorkian, M., & Russom, A. (2010). Sexting, texting, cyberbullying and keeping youth safe online. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 523–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Månsson, S. A. (2005). An internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(3), 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diliberto, G. M., & Mattey, E. (2009). Sexting: Just how much of a danger is it and what can school nurses do about it? NASN School Nurse, 24(6), 262–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. (2003). Women and the web: Cybersex activity and implications. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(3), 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B. A. (2001). Black’s Law dictionary (Second pocket ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A. A. (2013). Adolescents, sexting and human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 13(4), 623–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Messer, D., Bauermeister, J. A., Grodzinski, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2013). Sexting among young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasinoff, A. A. (2013). Sexting as media production: Rethinking social media and sexuality. New Media & Society, 15(4), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasinoff, A. A. (2014). Blaming sexualization for sexting. Girlhood Studies, 7(1), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holoyda, B., Landess, J., Sorrentino, R., & Friedman, S. H. (2018). Trouble at teens’ fingertips: Youth sexting and the law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(2), 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houck, C. D., Barker, D., Rizzo, C., Hancock, E., Norton, A., & Brown, L. K. (2014). Sexting and sexual behavior in at-risk adolescents. Pediatrics, 133(2), 276–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (2010). Teen ‘sexting’. Baltimore Jewish Times, 314(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. (2017). Re-visiting the constitutionality of Canada’s child pornography laws. Ontario Bar Association. https://www.oba.org/JUST/Archives_List/2017/February/ChildPornographyLaws?utm_source=LYR&utm_medium=EM&utm_campaign=Just+Magazine&utm_content=Just+Magazine+Email+February2017+2/16/2017+11:49:42+AM Retrieved August 22, 2017.

  • Judge, A. M. (2012). “Sexting” among US adolescents: Psychological and legal perspectives. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 20(2), 86–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karaian, L. (2012). Lolita speaks: ‘Sexting’, teenage girls and the law. Crime, Media, Culture, 8(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandaker, T. (2016). Canada’s first revenge porn convict gets 90 days in jail. Vice News. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from https://news.vice.com/article/canadas-first-revenge-porn-convict-gets-90-days-in-jail.

  • Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J., & Mellor, D. J. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(1), 44–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korenis, P., & Billick, S. B. (2014). Forensic implications: Adolescent sexting and cyberbullying. Psychiatric Quarterly, 85(1), 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., Moak, S., & Walker, J. T. (2016). Effects of self-control, social control, and social learning on sexting behavior among South Korean youths. Youth & Society, 48(2), 242–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 1, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Ybarra, M. L., & Price-Feeney, M. (2016). Nonconsensual image sharing: One in 25 Americans has been a victim of “revenge porn.” New York: Data & Society Research Institute, Center for Innovative Public Health Research. Retrieved April 1, 2017 from https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Nonconsensual_Image_Sharing_2016.pdf.

  • Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327–335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, A. D. (2016). Sexting prosecutions: Teenagers and child pornography laws. Howard Law Journal, 60, 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. (2018). Minnesota prosecutor charges sexting teenage girl with child pornography. American Civil Liberties Union Juvenile Justice Blog. Retrieved July 5, 2018 from https://www.aclu.org/blog/juvenile-justice/minnesota-prosecutor-charges-sexting-teenage-girl-child-pornography.

  • O’Connor, K. W., Drouin, M., Yergens, N., & Newsham, G. (2017). Sexting legislation in the United States and abroad: A call for uniformity. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 11(2), 218–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M. A., & Pfeiffer, E. J. (2009). “That’s nasty” to curiosity: Early adolescent cognitions about sexual abstinence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(6), 575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2020). Sextortion among adolescents: Results from a national survey of US youth. Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 30–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson-Iyer, K. (2013). Mobile porn?: Teenage sexting and justice for women. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 33(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2014). Blurred lines? Responding to ‘sexting’ and gender-based violence among young people. Children Australia, 39(2), 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R v M. B., 2016 BCCA 476.

  • Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and “sexting”: A report prepared for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Retrieved December 9, 2016 from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/qualitative-study-children-young-peoplesexting-report.pdf.

  • Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samimi, P., & Alderson, K. G. (2014). Sexting among undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7(4), 249–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. F., & Southern, S. (2000). Compulsive cybersex: The new tea room. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7(1–2), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. (2015). Sexting, digital dissent and narratives of innocence–controlling the child’s body. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 19, 315–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slane, A. (2013). Sexting and the law in Canada. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22(3), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Song, T. M., & Lee, J. R. (2018). Stay alert: Forecasting the risks of sexting in Korea using social big data. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger, V. C., Zimmerman, H., Temple, J. R., & Madigan, S. (2019). Teenagers, sexting, and the law. Pediatrics, 143(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3183.

  • Strassberg, D. S., McKinnon, R. K., Sustaíta, M. A., & Rullo, J. (2013). Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(1), 15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strohmaier, H., Murphy, M., & DeMatteo, D. (2014). Youth sexting: Prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(3), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. R. (2009). Sexting: Fun or felony. Principal Leadership, 9(8), 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. R., & Choi, H. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 134(5), e1287–e1292. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1974.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. R., Le, V. D., van den Berg, P., Ling, Y., Paul, J. A., & Temple, B. W. (2014). Brief report: Teen sexting and psychosocial health. Journal of Adolescence, 37(1), 33–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. G., & Cauffman, E. (2014). Youth sexting as child pornography? Developmental science supports less harsh sanctions for juvenile sexters. New Criminal Law Review, 17(4), 631–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Heirman, W. (2015). The association between adolescent sexting, psychosocial difficulties, and risk behavior: Integrative review. Journal of School Nursing, 31(1), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Temple, J. R. (2019). Sexting. The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–6). Retrieved June 27, 2019 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0219.

  • Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2011). Sexting and young people: Experts’ views. Youth Studies Australia, 30(4), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Heirman, W., & Verbeek, A. (2015). Whether or not to engage in sexting: Explaining adolescent sexting behaviour by applying the prototype willingness model. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 796–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Sexting: When are state prosecutors deciding to prosecute? The Third National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (NJOV-3). Durham, NH: Crimes Against Children Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weins, W. J., & Hiestand, T. C. (2009). Sexting, statutes, and saved by the bell: Introducing a lesser juvenile charge with an aggravating factors framework. Tennessee Law Review, 77, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisskirch, R. S., & Delevi, R. (2011). “Sexting” and adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1697–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M., Finkelhor, D., Wolak, J., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Defining child pornography: Law enforcement dilemmas in investigations of internet child pornography possession. Police Practice and Research, 8(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. L. (2011). Teens, sexts & cyberspace: The constitutional implications of current sexting & cyberbullying laws. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 20(3), 1017–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemmels, D. R., & Khey, D. N. (2015). Sharing of digital visual media: Privacy concerns and trust among young people. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkel, P. A. (2009). All a Twitter about sexting. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 76–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 655 Auditorium Road, Baker Hall Rm 138, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Jin Ree Lee & Kathleen M. Darcy

Authors
  1. Jin Ree Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen M. Darcy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Ree Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.R., Darcy, K.M. Sexting: What’s Law Got to Do with It?. Arch Sex Behav 50, 563–573 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01727-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01727-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation