Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

No Evidence of Bias in Sexual Partnership Corroboration by Race and Ethnicity Among a Diverse Cohort of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Black men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to experience disproportionately high HIV incidence rates relative to their white peers. Yet, Black MSM do not report higher levels of sexual risk behavior, and contextual factors such as access to care and sexual networks only partially explain these disparities. However, risk misclassification could help explain this paradox, if measurement biases systematically underestimate sexual risk behavior among Black MSM relative to their peers. The current study examined variation in sexual partnership corroboration in the RADAR study, a large and diverse cohort of young MSM and transgender women. Network data were elicited regarding all sexual partners in the prior 6 months, including instances where participants reported other participants as sexual partners. Using these data, anal and condomless anal sex partners were separately examined using a series of exponential random graph models to estimate the rate of corroboration of sexual connections between participants and examine whether this parameter varied by race/ethnicity. For both types of behavior, providing separate estimates for corroboration across race/ethnicity groups reduced model fit and did not significantly vary across groups. Accordingly, we found no evidence of measurement bias by race/ethnicity in the current data. However, overall rates of corroboration (41.2–50.3%) were low, suggesting substantial levels of measurement error. Accordingly, it is vital that researchers continue to improve upon methods to measure risk behavior in order to maximize their validity. We discuss the implications of these findings, including potential alternative causes of risk misclassification (e.g., sampling bias) and future directions to reduce measurement error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA036939, PI: Mustanski; K08DA037825, PI: Birkett) and the National Library of Medicine (R21LM012578; PI: Janulis) of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Janulis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards and approved by our institutional review board.

Informed Consent

Informed consent for participants 18 years or older and informed assent for participants ages 16–17 years were obtained from all individuals included in the study. A waiver of parental consent was obtained from the institutional review board for participants 16 to 17 years old.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janulis, P., Neray, B., Birkett, M. et al. No Evidence of Bias in Sexual Partnership Corroboration by Race and Ethnicity Among a Diverse Cohort of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women. Arch Sex Behav 49, 267–274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1455-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1455-0

Keywords

Navigation