Abstract
Little research on contraceptive decision-making takes a holistic perspective to understand women’s contraceptive journeys throughout the reproductive life course. This analysis investigated how Black and Latina women’s past experiences with contraceptive use and acquisition impact their feelings and attitudes toward future use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). We utilized data from in-depth interviews that explored contraceptive decision-making and knowledge of, interest in, and attitudes toward IUDs among 38 young Black and Latina women collected in 2013 in the San Francisco Bay Area. Here, we focused on the IUD decision-making process among a subsample of 32 women who were not using or had not previously used an IUD. Overall, we found a strong link between past contraceptive experiences and attitudes regarding future use of IUDs. Notably, participants often referenced experiences of side effects with previous methods when explaining their interest—or lack thereof—in IUD use, as well as made links between contraceptive attributes they had experienced positively and attributes of the IUD. A minority of participants described being satisfied with their current method, resulting in a lack of interest in considering IUD use. More than half of participants described distrust, either in healthcare providers owing to previous negative interactions and contraceptive failures of provider-recommended methods or owing to family members’ and friends’ negative experiences with IUDs. This distrust undergirded their lack of interest in the IUD. These findings highlight the importance of locating contraceptive decision-making in the broader context of reproductive journeys.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009). ACOG committee opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology,114, 1434–1438.
Amico, J. R., Bennett, A. H., Karasz, A., & Gold, M. (2017). “I wish they could hold on a little longer”: Physicians’ experiences with requests for early IUD removal. Contraception,96, 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.007.
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. (2017). Making the economic case for long-acting reversible contraception. Retrieved from Arlington, VA: http://www.astho.org/Programs/Maternal-and-Child-Health/Documents/Making-the-Economic-Case-for-LARC/.
Backman, T., Huhtala, S., Luoto, R., Tuominen, J., Rauramo, I., & Koskenvuo, M. (2002). Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstetrics and Gynecology,99, 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01764-1.
Barcelos, C. (2018). Culture, contraception, and colorblindess: Youth sexual health promotion as a gendered racial project. Gender & Society,32, 252–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217745314.
Becker, D., & Tsui, A. O. (2008). Reproductive health service preferences and perceptions of quality among low-income women: Racial, ethnic and language group differences. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,40, 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1363/4020208.
Benkert, R., Hollie, B., Nordstrom, C. K., Wickson, B., & Bins-Emerick, L. (2009). Trust, mistrust, racial identity and patient satisfaction in urban African American primary care patients of nurse practitioners. Journal of Nursing Scholarship,41, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01273.x.
Bird, S. T., & Bogart, L. M. (2001). Perceived race-based and socioeconomic status (SES)-based discrimination in interactions with health care providers. Ethnicity and Disease,11, 554–563.
Bird, S. T., & Bogart, L. M. (2003). Birth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Psychology,8, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105303008002669.
Blumenthal, P. D., Voedisch, A., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2011). Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Human Reproduction Update,17, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq026.
Brandi, K., Woodhams, E., White, K. O., & Mehta, P. K. (2018). An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion. Contraception,97, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009.
Branum, A. M., & Jones, J. (2015). Trends in long-acting reversible contraception use among US women aged 15–44. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
Brown, S. S., & Eisenberg, L. (Eds.). (1995). The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR,59, 1–86.
Cleland, K., Zhu, H., Goldstuck, N., Cheng, L., & Trussell, J. (2012). The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: A systematic review of 35 years of experience. Human Reproduction,27, 1994–2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des140.
Coombe, J., Harris, M. L., & Loxton, D. (2019). Motivators of contraceptive method change and implications for long-acting reversible contraception (non-)use: A qualitative free-text analysis. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 19, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.12.004.
Daniels, K., & Abma, J. C. (2018). Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2015–2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db327.htm.
Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. National Health Statistics Reports; No. 86. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Data USA. (2018). Physicians and surgeons. Retrieved from https://datausa.io/profile/soc/291060/-demographics.
Dehlendorf, C., Anderson, N., Vittinghoff, E., Grumbach, K., Levy, K., & Steinauer, J. (2017). Quality and content of patient-provider communication about contraception: Differences by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Womens Health Issues,27, 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.005.
Dehlendorf, C., Kimport, K., Levy, K., & Steinauer, J. (2014a). A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,46, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e2114.
Dehlendorf, C., Krajewski, C., & Borrero, S. (2014b). Contraceptive counseling: Best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology,57, 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0000000000000059.
Dehlendorf, C., Levy, K., Kelley, A., Grumbach, K., & Steinauer, J. (2013). Women’s preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making. Contraception,88, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012.
Dehlendorf, C., Ruskin, R., Grumbach, K., Vittinghoff, E., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Schillinger, D., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: A randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,203, 319.e1.
Dennis, A., & Grossman, D. (2012). Barriers to contraception and interest in over-the-counter access among low-income women: A qualitative study. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,44, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1363/4408412.
Downey, M. M., Arteaga, S., Villaseñor, E., & Gómez, A. M. (2017). More than a destination: Contraceptive decision making as a journey. Women’s Health Issues,27, 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2017.03.004.
Downing, R. A., LaVeist, T. A., & Bullock, H. E. (2007). Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health. American Journal of Public Health,97, 1803–1807. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092585.
Fleming, K. L., Sokoloff, A., & Raine, T. R. (2010). Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception,82, 178–182.
Forrest, J. D., & Frost, J. J. (1996). The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women. Family Planning Perspectives,28, 246–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136053.
Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E. (2008). Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,40, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1363/4009408.
Gamble, V. N. (1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health,87, 1773–1778. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.87.11.1773.
Gilliam, M. L., Warden, M., Goldstein, C., & Tapia, B. (2004). Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: A focus-group approach. Contraception,70, 299–305.
Gómez, A. M., Arteaga, S., Ingraham, N., Arcara, J., & Villaseñor, E. (2018a). It’s not planned, but is it okay? The acceptability of unplanned pregnancy among young people. Women’s Health Issues,28, 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.07.001.
Gómez, A. M., Arteaga, S., Villaseñor, E., Arcara, J., & Freihart, B. (2019). The misclassification of ambivalence in pregnancy intentions: A mixed methods analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 51, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12088.
Gómez, A. M., & Clark, J. B. (2014). The relationship between contraceptive features preferred by young women and interest in IUDs: An exploratory analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,46, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e2014.
Gómez, A. M., & Freihart, B. (2017). Motivations for interest, disinterest and uncertainty in intrauterine device use among young women. Maternal and Child Health Journal,21, 1753–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2297-9.
Gómez, A. M., Fuentes, L., & Allina, A. (2014). Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,46, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1614.
Gómez, A. M., Hartofelis, E. C., Finlayson, S., & Clark, J. B. (2015). Do knowledge and attitudes regarding intrauterine devices predict interest in their use? Women’s Health Issues,25, 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.011.
Gómez, A. M., Mann, E. S., & Torres, V. (2018b). ‘It would have control over me instead of me having control’: Intrauterine devices and the meaning of reproductive freedom. Critical Public Health,28, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1343935.
Gómez, A. M., & Wapman, M. (2017). Under (implicit) pressure: Young Black and Latina women’s perceptions of contraceptive care. Contraception,96, 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.007.
Gray, E., & McDonald, P. (2009). Using a reproductive life course approach to understand contraceptive method use in Australia. Journal of Biosocial Science,42, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932009990381.
Grossman, D., Grindlay, K., Li, R., Potter, J. E., Trussell, J., & Blanchard, K. (2013). Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States. Contraception,88, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.005.
Gubrium, A. C., Mann, E. S., Borrero, S., Dehlendorf, C., Fields, J., Geronimus, A. T., & Sisson, G. (2016). Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900.
Guendelman, S., Denny, C., Mauldon, J., & Chetkovich, C. (2000). Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women. Maternal and Child Health Journal,4, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026643621387.
Gutierrez, E. R. (2008). Fertile matters: The politics of Mexican-origin women’s reproduction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Haider, S., Stoffel, C., Donenberg, G., & Geller, S. (2013). Reproductive health disparities: A focus on family planning and prevention among minority women and adolescents. Global Advances in Health and Medicine,2, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.056.
Halbert, C., Armstrong, K., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Shaker, L. (2006). Racial differences in trust in health care providers. Archives of Internal Medicine,166, 896–901. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.8.896.
Han, L., Teal, S. B., Sheeder, J., & Tocce, K. (2014). Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: Is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,211, 24.e21–24.e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.015.
Harper, C. C., Rocca, C. H., Thompson, K. M., Morfesis, J., Goodman, S., Darney, P. D., & Speidel, J. J. (2015). Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet,386, 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62460-0.
Harvey, S., Henderson, J., & Casillas, A. (2006). Factors associated with effective contraceptive use among a sample of Latina women. Women and Health,43(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v43n02_01.
Higgins, J. A. (2014). Celebration meets caution: LARC’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception,89, 237–241.
Higgins, J. A., Kramer, R. D., & Ryder, K. M. (2016). Provider bias in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) promotion and removal: Perceptions of young adult women. American Journal of Public Health,106, 1932–1937. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393.
Hoopes, A. J., Gilmore, K., Cady, J., Akers, A. Y., & Ahrens, K. R. (2016). A qualitative study of factors that influence contraceptive choice among adolescent school-based health center patients. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,29, 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.011.
Jackson, A. V., Karasek, D., Dehlendorf, C., & Foster, D. G. (2016). Racial and ethnic differences in women’s preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception,93, 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010.
Johnson, K. M., Greil, A. L., Shreffler, K. M., & McQuillan, J. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Toward an integrative research agenda. Population Research and Policy Review, 37, 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-018-9476-2.
Judge, C. P., & Borrero, S. (2017). Contraceptive decision making after the 2016 US presidential election. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,217, 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.025.
Kavanaugh, M. L., Jerman, J., & Finer, L. B. (2015). Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. Women, 2009–2012. Obstetrics and Gynecology,126, 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001094.
Kumar, M. M. (2018). Long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents: More complex than “first-line”. JAMA Pediatrics,172, 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3520.
Landau, S. C., Tapias, M. P., & McGhee, B. T. (2006). Birth control within reach: A national survey on women’s attitudes toward and interest in pharmacy access to hormonal contraception. Contraception,74, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.006.
Lessard, L. N., Karasek, D., Ma, S., Darney, P., Deardorff, J., Lahiff, M., & Foster, D. G. (2012). Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,44, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1363/4419412.
Littlejohn, K. E. (2013). “It’s those pills that are ruining me”: Gender and the social meanings of hormonal contraceptive side effects. Gender & Society,27, 843–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213504033.
Littlejohn, K. E., & Kimport, K. (2017). Contesting and differentially constructing uncertainty: Negotiations of contraceptive use in the clinical encounter. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,58, 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.352010.1177/0022146517736822.
Luker, K. (1999). A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers. Family Planning Perspectives,31, 248–249.
Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., Omvig, K. J., Secura, G. M., & Peipert, J. F. (2013). Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception,88, 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.015.
Madden, T., Secura, G. M., Nease, R. F., Politi, M. C., & Peipert, J. F. (2015). The role of contraceptive attributes in women’s contraceptive decision making. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,213, 46.e41–46.e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051.
Maietta, R. C. (2006). State of the art: Integrating software with qualitative analysis. In L. Curry, R. Shield, & T. Wetle (Eds.), Improving aging and public health research: Qualitative and mixed methods (pp. 117–139). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association and the Gerontological Society of America.
Manlove, J., Welti, K., Barry, M., Peterson, K., Schelar, E., & Wildsmith, E. (2011). Relationship characteristics and contraceptive use among young adults. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,43, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1363/441941210.1363/4311911.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Minnis, A. M., Mavedzenge, S. N., Luecke, E., & Dehlendorf, C. (2014). Provider counseling to young women seeking family planning services. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,46, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1414.
Moreau, C., Cleland, K., & Trussell, J. (2007). Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States. Contraception,76, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.008.
Northridge, J. L., & Coupey, S. M. (2015). Realizing reproductive health equity for adolescents and young adults. American Journal of Public Health,105, 1284. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302701.
Parks, C., & Peipert, J. F. (2016). Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,214, 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.017.
Peipert, J., Madden, T., Allsworth, J., Zhao, Q., Eisenberg, D., & Secura, G. (2010). Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception: A preliminary analysis from the contraceptive choice project. Contraception,82, 193–194.
Raine, T. R., Gard, J. C., Boyer, C. B., Haider, S., Brown, B. A., Ramirez Hernandez, F. A., & Harper, C. C. (2010). Contraceptive decision-making in sexual relationships: Young men’s experiences, attitudes and values. Culture, Health & Sexuality,12, 373–386.
Roberts, D. (1997). Killing the Black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Pantheon Books.
Rodriguez, M. I., Evans, M., & Espey, E. (2014). Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: Increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception,90, 468–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.001.
Rubin, S. E., Felsher, M., Korich, F., & Jacobs, A. M. (2016). Urban adolescents’ and young adults’ decision-making process around selection of intrauterine contraception. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,29, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.09.001.
Sacks, T. K. (2017). The single case study: Understanding the life history of a Tuskegee Syphilis Study descendant. SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 2. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473997189.
Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. A., Bass, J. L., & Bancroft, J. (2001). A prospective study of the effects of oral contraceptives on sexuality and well-being and their relationship to discontinuation. Contraception,64, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00218-9.
Sawhill, I. V. (2014). Generation unbound: Drifting into sex and parenthood without marriage. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Secura, G. M. (2013). Long-acting reversible contraception: A practical solution to reduce unintended pregnancy. Minerva Ginecologica,65, 271–277.
Snyder, A. H., Weisman, C. S., Liu, G., Leslie, D., & Chuang, C. H. (2018). The impact of the Affordable Care Act on contraceptive use and costs among privately insured women. Women’s Health Issues,28, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.005.
Sorkin, D. H., Ngo-Metzger, Q., & De Alba, I. (2010). Racial/ethnic discrimination in health care: Impact on perceived quality of care. Journal of General Internal Medicine,25, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1257-5.
Speidel, J. J., Harper, C. C., & Shields, W. C. (2008). The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy. Contraception,78, 197–200.
Stevens, L. M. (2018). “We have to be mythbusters”: Clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception. Social Science and Medicine,212, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.020.
Sweeney, L.-A., Molloy, G. J., Byrne, M., Murphy, A. W., Morgan, K., Hughes, C. M., & Ingham, R. (2015). A qualitative study of prescription contraception use: The perspectives of users, general practitioners and pharmacists. PLoS ONE,10, e0144074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144074.
Thompson, K. M. J., Rocca, C. H., Kohn, J. E., Goodman, S., Stern, L., Blum, M., & Harper, C. C. (2016). Public funding for contraception, provider training, and use of highly effective contraceptives: A cluster randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health,106, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.303001.
Thorburn, S., & Bogart, L. M. (2005). Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: Barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age. Health Education & Behavior,32, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198105276220.
Washington, H. A. (2006). The Black stork. Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present (pp. 189–215). New York: First Anchor Books.
Weston, M. R., Martins, S. L., Neustadt, A. B., & Gilliam, M. L. (2012). Factors influencing uptake of intrauterine devices among postpartum adolescents: A qualitative study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,206, 40.e41–40.e47.
Yee, L. M., & Simon, M. A. (2010). The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina women. Journal of Adolescent Health,47, 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.014.
Yee, L. M., & Simon, M. A. (2011). Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved,22, 1387–1400.
Zuckerman, B., Nathan, S., & Mate, K. (2014). Preventing unintended pregnancy: A pediatric opportunity. Pediatrics,133, 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1147.
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this article was supported by an individual investigator grant from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at San Francisco State University. The authors thank Kelly Bermudes, Vanessa Cardona, Airial Clark, and Vanessa Torres for their work in designing the study, interviewing participants, and cleaning the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Arteaga, Aronson, Houston, Goodkind, and West declare that they have no conflict of interest. Gomez has served as an advisor for and received grant funding from Gilead Sciences.
Statement of Human Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, A.M., Arteaga, S., Aronson, N. et al. No Perfect Method: Exploring How Past Contraceptive Methods Influence Current Attitudes Toward Intrauterine Devices. Arch Sex Behav 49, 1367–1378 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1424-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1424-7