Skip to main content
Log in

Pornography and Relationship Quality: Establishing the Dominant Pattern by Examining Pornography Use and 31 Measures of Relationship Quality in 30 National Surveys

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Numerous studies have examined the association between pornography use and various measures of relationship quality. Yet scholars have also pointed out the limitations of many such studies, including inconsistent findings for men and women, non-representative samples, and negatively biased measures that could result in misleading findings. The purpose of this study was to establish a dominant pattern in the association between pornography use and relationship quality in a way that mitigated these issues. Data were taken from 30 nationally representative surveys, which together included 31 measures of relationship quality: 1973–2018 General Social Surveys (1 repeated measure); 2006 Portraits of American Life Study (13 measures); 2012 New Family Structures Study (12 measures); and 2014 Relationships in America Survey (5 measures). This allowed for 57 independent tests examining the association between pornography use and relationship outcomes for married Americans and 29 independent tests for unmarried Americans. Along with bivariate associations, full regression models were estimated with sociodemographic controls and interaction terms for gender. For married and unmarried Americans alike, pornography use was either unassociated or negatively associated with nearly all relationship outcomes. Significant associations were mostly small in magnitude. Conversely, except for one unclear exception, pornography use was never positively associated with relationship quality. Associations were only occasionally moderated by gender, but in inconsistent directions. While this study makes no claims about causality, findings clearly affirmed that, in instances where viewing pornography is associated with relationship quality at all, it is nearly always a signal of poorer relationship quality, for men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Campbell and Kohut (2017, p. 7) argued that much of the previous research (citing studies like Lambert et al., 2012) “assumes, assesses, and subsequently confirms that pornography is detrimental to relationships.” Particularly problematic, it was argued, is that studies often do not measure nonnegative outcomes, but rather structure questions in ways that either confirm or fail to confirm negative effects. This potentially places critical limits on what can be learned about pornography’s association with relationship outcomes.

  2. While PALS has 13 measures of relationship quality, one of those questions asks explicitly about “marital separation” and thus only 12 are used for unmarried Americans.

  3. In ancillary analyses (available upon request), an index was constructed from the continuous-level measures of relationship quality presented in Table 3, after having been standardized into Z-scores (α = .82). Associations between pornography viewing and this index were statistically significant at the bivariate level (unmarried: r = − .24, p < .001; married: r = − .11, p < .001) and with controls in OLS regression models (unmarried: b = − 1.24, p < .001; married: b = − .58, p < .001). Gender interactions were nonsignificant.

  4. In ancillary analyses (available upon request), an index was created from the continuous-level measures presented in Table 4, after having been standardized into Z-scores (α = .94). Associations between pornography viewing and this index were significant at the bivariate level for married participants (r = .08, p = .011), but not unmarried participants (r = .06, p = .076). In OLS models with controls in place, pornography use was only marginally associated with this relationship quality index for unmarried Americans (b = − .37, p = .063), though this association was quite significant for married Americans (b = − .72, p < .001). Gender interactions were nonsignificant.


  • Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partner’s use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,29, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, A. J., & Morokoff, P. J. (2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships,18, 562–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., & Kohut, T. (2017). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology,13, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, K., & Price, J. (2014). Pornography and marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues,35, 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. O., Sikkink, D., & James, A. (2010). The panel study on American religion and ethnicity: Background, methods, and selected results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,49, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., Kuyper, L., Adam, P. C. G., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2013). Does viewing explain doing? Assessing the association between sexually explicit materials use and sexual behaviors in a large sample of Dutch adolescents and young adults. Journal of Sexual Medicine,10, 2986–2995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., Negash, S., Stillman, T. F., Olmstead, S. P., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,31, 410–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchi, A., Gordon, D., Porter, A., Regnerus, R., Ryngaert, J., & Sarangaya, L. (2014). Relationships in American survey. The Austin Institute for the Study of Family and Culture. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from

  • Maddox, A., Rhoades, G., & Markman, H. (2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 441–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity,13, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minarcik, J., Wetterneck, C. T., & Short, M. B. (2016). The effects of sexually explicit material use on romantic relationship dynamics. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,5, 700–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. M. (2011). Associations between young adults’ use of sexually explicit materials and their sexual preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research,48, 520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muusses, L. D., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). Internet pornography and relationship quality: A longitudinal study of within and between partner effects of adjustment, sexual satisfaction and sexually explicit internet material among newly-weds. Computers in Human Behavior,45, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, N. P., & Harris, S. M. (2016). Pornography and couples: What does the research tell us? Contemporary Family Therapy,38, 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. B., Negash, S., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Emerging adults expectations for pornography use in the context of future committed romantic relationships: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 625–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R., & Price, J. (2012). Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,51, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2016). From bad to worse? Pornography consumption, spousal religiosity, gender, and marital quality. Sociological Forum,31, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017a). Does viewing pornography reduce marital quality over time? Evidence from longitudinal data. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017b). Spousal religiosity, religious bonding, and pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2018). Pornography use and marital separation: Evidence from two-wave panel data. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1869–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2019a). Is the link between pornography use and relational happiness really more about masturbation? Results from two national surveys. Journal of Sex Research.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2019b). Addicted to lust: Pornography in the lives of conservative protestants. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Davis, J. T. (2017). Are pornography users more likely to experience a romantic breakup? Evidence from longitudinal data. Sexuality and Culture,21, 1157–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Schleifer, C. (2018). Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. Journal of Sex Research,55, 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Schleifer, C. (2019). Race and trends in pornography viewing, 1973–2016: Examining the moderating roles of gender and religion. Journal of Sex Research,56, 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2019). Only bad for believers? Religion, pornography use, and sexual satisfaction among American men. Journal of Sex Research,56, 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication,59, 407–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. Journal of Sex Research,50, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K. (2016). A historical and empirical review of pornography and romantic relationships: Implications for family researchers. Journal of Family Theory & Review,8, 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2016). Documenting pornography use in America: A comparative analysis of methodological approaches. Journal of Sex Research,53, 873–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity,7, 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., Wasserman, I., & Kern, R. (2004). Adult social bonds and use of internet pornography. Social Science Quarterly,85, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., & Busby, D. M. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Exploring variations in the perceptions of pornography. Journal of Sex Research,53, 678–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2013). U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research,50, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Bae, S., & Funk, M. (2013). United States women and pornography through four decades: Exposure, attitudes, behaviors, individual differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 1131–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2018). Women’s perceptions of their male partner’s pornography consumption and relational, sexual, self, and body satisfaction: Toward a theoretical model. Annals of the International Communication Association,42, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., & Bae, S. (2014). More than a dalliance? Pornography consumption and extramarital sex attitudes among married U.S. adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture,3, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., Kraus, A., & Klann, E. (2017). Pornography consumption and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research,43, 315–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel L. Perry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No animals or human subjects were involved with this study.

Informed Consent

The data used in this study were secondary data. As such, informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perry, S.L. Pornography and Relationship Quality: Establishing the Dominant Pattern by Examining Pornography Use and 31 Measures of Relationship Quality in 30 National Surveys. Arch Sex Behav 49, 1199–1213 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: