Abstract
We report here on survey data from 11 genetic males, who had voluntary penectomies without any explicit medical need, yet did not desire testicular ablation. This group was compared to a control group of men who completed the same survey but had no genital ablation. The penectomy group was less likely to identify as male than the control group. They were also more likely to have attempted self-injury to their penis (at a median age of 41.5 years), been attracted to males without penises, and felt that they were more physically attractive without a penis than the controls. Motivations for voluntary penectomy were aesthetics (i.e., a feeling that the penile removal made them more physically attractive) or eroticism (i.e., at least two individuals thought that a penectomy would make them a better submissive sexual partner). In terms of sexual function, the penectomized and control groups reported comparable sexual function, with six penectomized individuals claiming to still be able to get and keep an erection, suggesting possible incomplete penile ablation. In their childhood, penectomized individuals were more likely than the controls to have pretended to be castrated and to have involved the absence of genitals of their toys in their childhood play. We discuss characteristics and sexual outcomes for individuals who have had a voluntary penectomy. A future study with a larger sample size on men who desire penectomies is warranted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brett, M. A., Roberts, L. F., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2007). Eunuchs in contemporary society: Expectations, consequences, and adjustments to castration (part II). Journal of Sexual Medicine,4, 946–955.
Cash, T. F. (2000). The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire (3rd rev). www.body-images.com.
Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Ive, S. (2006). Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology,42, 283–292.
Fisher, C. M. (1999). Phantom erection after amputation of penis. Case description and review of the relevant literature on phantoms. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences,26, 53–56.
Franke, C. B., & Rush, J. A. (2007). Autocastration and autoamputation of the penis in a patient with delusions of sexual guilt. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry,21, 2. https://doi.org/10.29046/JJP.021.1.002.
Greilsheimer, H., & Groves, J. E. (1979). Male genital self-mutilation. Archives of General Psychiatry,36, 441–446.
Handy, A. B., Jackowich, R. A., Wibowo, E., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2016). Gender preference in the sexual attractions, fantasies, and relationships of voluntarily castrated men. Sexual Medicine,4, e51–e59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2015.11.001.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions,3, 710–724.
Johnson, T. W., Brett, M. A., Roberts, L. F., & Wassersug, R. J. (2007). Eunuchs in contemporary society: Characterizing men who are voluntarily castrated (part I). Journal of Sexual Medicine,4, 930–945.
Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2010). Gender identity disorder outside the binary: When gender identity disorder-not otherwise specified is not good enough [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 597–598.
Johnson, T. W., Wassersug, R. J., Roberts, L. F., Brett, M. A., Sutherland, M., & First, M. B. (2010). Desire for castration is not a body integrity identity disorder (BIID): A response. Journal of Sexual Medicine,7, 852–855.
Lawrence, A. A. (2010). Transsexuals and nontranssexuals do not differ in prevalence of post-penectomy phantoms. Journal of Consciousness Studies,17, 195–196.
Lowe, B., Decker, O., Muller, S., Brahler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008). Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care,46, 266–274.
Macauda, G., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., & Brugger, P. (2017). When less is more: Implicit preference for incomplete bodies in xenomelia. Journal of Psychiatric Research,84, 249–255.
Maddineni, S. B., Lau, M. M., & Sangar, V. K. (2009). Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: A systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Urology,9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-9-8.
McGahuey, C. A., Gelenberg, A. J., Laukes, C. A., Moreno, F. A., Delgado, P. L., McKnight, K. M., & Manber, R. (2000). The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): Reliability and validity. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,26, 25–40.
Mellon, C. D., Barlow, C., Cook, J., & Clark, R. D. (1989). Autocastration and autopenectomy in a patient with trans-sexualism and schizophrenia. Journal of Sex Research,26, 125–130.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement,1, 385–401.
Ramachandran, V. S., & McGeoch, P. D. (2008). Phantom penises in transsexuals. Journal of Consciousness Studies,15, 5–16.
Rice, K., Prichard, I., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2016). Exposure to Barbie: Effects on thin-ideal internalisation, body esteem, and body dissatisfaction among young girls. Body Image,19, 142–149.
Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PLoS ONE,7, e39048.
Singh, G. S., Bhushan, B. M., Singh, H. N., & Singh, L. R. K. (2013). Major self-mutilation: Profile of seven cases. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry,22, 84–90.
Sosnowski, R., Kulpa, M., Kosowicz, M., Wolski, J. K., Kuczkiewicz, O., Moskal, K., … Demkow, T. (2016). Quality of life in penile carcinoma patients - post-total penectomy. Central European Journal of Urology,69, 204–211.
Stunell, H., Power, R. E., Floyd, M., Jr., & Quinlan, D. M. (2006). Genital self-mutilation. International Journal of Urology,13, 1358–1360.
Thombs, B. D., Bernstein, D. P., Ziegelstein, R. C., Scher, C. D., Forde, D. R., Walker, E. A., & Stein, M. B. (2006). An evaluation of screening questions for childhood abuse in 2 community samples: Implications for clinical practice. Archives of Internal Medicine,166, 2020–2026.
Vale, K., Siemens, I., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2013). Religiosity, childhood abuse, and other risk factors correlated with voluntary genital ablation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,45, 230–237.
Veale, D., Miles, S., Read, J., Troglia, A., Carmona, L., Fiorito, C., & Muir, G. (2015). Penile dysmorphic disorder: Development of a screening scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 2311–2321.
Volkmer, B. G., & Maier, S. (2002). Successful penile replantation following autoamputation: Twice! International Journal of Impotence Research,14, 197–198.
Wade, N. J., & Finger, S. (2010). Phantom penis: Historical dimensions. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences,19, 299–312.
Wassersug, R. J., McKenna, E., & Lieberman, T. (2012). Eunuch as a gender identity after castration. Journal of Gender Studies,21, 253–270.
Wise, T. N., & Kalyanam, R. C. (2000). Amputee fetishism and genital mutilation: Case report and literature review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,26, 339–344.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Eunuch Archive Steering Committee for helping us post the survey on eunuch.org. We also thank Martin Lalumière and Qazi Rahman for critical feedback on the draft manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported in part by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to R.J.W. (Grant RGPIN/8194-2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wibowo, E., Wong, S.T.S., Wassersug, R.J. et al. Characteristics of Males Who Obtained a Voluntary Penectomy. Arch Sex Behav 49, 793–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01607-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01607-8