Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of Males Who Obtained a Voluntary Penectomy

  • Clinical Case Report Series
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report here on survey data from 11 genetic males, who had voluntary penectomies without any explicit medical need, yet did not desire testicular ablation. This group was compared to a control group of men who completed the same survey but had no genital ablation. The penectomy group was less likely to identify as male than the control group. They were also more likely to have attempted self-injury to their penis (at a median age of 41.5 years), been attracted to males without penises, and felt that they were more physically attractive without a penis than the controls. Motivations for voluntary penectomy were aesthetics (i.e., a feeling that the penile removal made them more physically attractive) or eroticism (i.e., at least two individuals thought that a penectomy would make them a better submissive sexual partner). In terms of sexual function, the penectomized and control groups reported comparable sexual function, with six penectomized individuals claiming to still be able to get and keep an erection, suggesting possible incomplete penile ablation. In their childhood, penectomized individuals were more likely than the controls to have pretended to be castrated and to have involved the absence of genitals of their toys in their childhood play. We discuss characteristics and sexual outcomes for individuals who have had a voluntary penectomy. A future study with a larger sample size on men who desire penectomies is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brett, M. A., Roberts, L. F., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2007). Eunuchs in contemporary society: Expectations, consequences, and adjustments to castration (part II). Journal of Sexual Medicine,4, 946–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F. (2000). The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire (3rd rev). www.body-images.com.

  • Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Ive, S. (2006). Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology,42, 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. M. (1999). Phantom erection after amputation of penis. Case description and review of the relevant literature on phantoms. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences,26, 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, C. B., & Rush, J. A. (2007). Autocastration and autoamputation of the penis in a patient with delusions of sexual guilt. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry,21, 2. https://doi.org/10.29046/JJP.021.1.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greilsheimer, H., & Groves, J. E. (1979). Male genital self-mutilation. Archives of General Psychiatry,36, 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, A. B., Jackowich, R. A., Wibowo, E., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2016). Gender preference in the sexual attractions, fantasies, and relationships of voluntarily castrated men. Sexual Medicine,4, e51–e59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2015.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions,3, 710–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. W., Brett, M. A., Roberts, L. F., & Wassersug, R. J. (2007). Eunuchs in contemporary society: Characterizing men who are voluntarily castrated (part I). Journal of Sexual Medicine,4, 930–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2010). Gender identity disorder outside the binary: When gender identity disorder-not otherwise specified is not good enough [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 597–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. W., Wassersug, R. J., Roberts, L. F., Brett, M. A., Sutherland, M., & First, M. B. (2010). Desire for castration is not a body integrity identity disorder (BIID): A response. Journal of Sexual Medicine,7, 852–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. A. (2010). Transsexuals and nontranssexuals do not differ in prevalence of post-penectomy phantoms. Journal of Consciousness Studies,17, 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, B., Decker, O., Muller, S., Brahler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008). Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical Care,46, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macauda, G., Bekrater-Bodmann, R., & Brugger, P. (2017). When less is more: Implicit preference for incomplete bodies in xenomelia. Journal of Psychiatric Research,84, 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddineni, S. B., Lau, M. M., & Sangar, V. K. (2009). Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: A systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Urology,9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-9-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGahuey, C. A., Gelenberg, A. J., Laukes, C. A., Moreno, F. A., Delgado, P. L., McKnight, K. M., & Manber, R. (2000). The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): Reliability and validity. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,26, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellon, C. D., Barlow, C., Cook, J., & Clark, R. D. (1989). Autocastration and autopenectomy in a patient with trans-sexualism and schizophrenia. Journal of Sex Research,26, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement,1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & McGeoch, P. D. (2008). Phantom penises in transsexuals. Journal of Consciousness Studies,15, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K., Prichard, I., Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2016). Exposure to Barbie: Effects on thin-ideal internalisation, body esteem, and body dissatisfaction among young girls. Body Image,19, 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PLoS ONE,7, e39048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. S., Bhushan, B. M., Singh, H. N., & Singh, L. R. K. (2013). Major self-mutilation: Profile of seven cases. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry,22, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowski, R., Kulpa, M., Kosowicz, M., Wolski, J. K., Kuczkiewicz, O., Moskal, K., … Demkow, T. (2016). Quality of life in penile carcinoma patients - post-total penectomy. Central European Journal of Urology,69, 204–211.

  • Stunell, H., Power, R. E., Floyd, M., Jr., & Quinlan, D. M. (2006). Genital self-mutilation. International Journal of Urology,13, 1358–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thombs, B. D., Bernstein, D. P., Ziegelstein, R. C., Scher, C. D., Forde, D. R., Walker, E. A., & Stein, M. B. (2006). An evaluation of screening questions for childhood abuse in 2 community samples: Implications for clinical practice. Archives of Internal Medicine,166, 2020–2026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vale, K., Siemens, I., Johnson, T. W., & Wassersug, R. J. (2013). Religiosity, childhood abuse, and other risk factors correlated with voluntary genital ablation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,45, 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, D., Miles, S., Read, J., Troglia, A., Carmona, L., Fiorito, C., & Muir, G. (2015). Penile dysmorphic disorder: Development of a screening scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 2311–2321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, B. G., & Maier, S. (2002). Successful penile replantation following autoamputation: Twice! International Journal of Impotence Research,14, 197–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N. J., & Finger, S. (2010). Phantom penis: Historical dimensions. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences,19, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassersug, R. J., McKenna, E., & Lieberman, T. (2012). Eunuch as a gender identity after castration. Journal of Gender Studies,21, 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, T. N., & Kalyanam, R. C. (2000). Amputee fetishism and genital mutilation: Case report and literature review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,26, 339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Eunuch Archive Steering Committee for helping us post the survey on eunuch.org. We also thank Martin Lalumière and Qazi Rahman for critical feedback on the draft manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant to R.J.W. (Grant RGPIN/8194-2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas W. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wibowo, E., Wong, S.T.S., Wassersug, R.J. et al. Characteristics of Males Who Obtained a Voluntary Penectomy. Arch Sex Behav 49, 793–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01607-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01607-8

Keywords

Navigation