Beliefs About Gender Predict Faking Orgasm in Heterosexual Women

Abstract

The majority of women have faked an orgasm at least once in their lives. In the current study, we assessed how women’s worldviews about gender relate to their faking orgasm behavior. A survey of 462 heterosexual women from the UK (Mage=38.38 years) found that those who espoused anti-feminist values—that is, those high in hostile sexism—had faked significantly more orgasms over their lifetime. In contrast, those who espoused ostensibly positive but restrictive ideas of gender relations—that is, those high in benevolent sexism—had faked significantly fewer orgasms over their lifetime. Furthermore, the more that women believed female orgasm was necessary for men’s sexual gratification, the more likely they were to have faked an orgasm at least once in their lives compared to women who had never faked an orgasm. These effects were small to moderate and emerged after controlling for demographics, sexual history, ease of orgasm, and previously established psychological correlates of faking orgasm, including suspected partner infidelity and intrasexual competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    We also conducted our analyses using the full scale, and the results remained unchanged.

References

  1. Ahrold, T. K., Farmer, M., Trapnell, P. D., & Meston, C. M. (2011). The relationship among sexual attitudes, sexual fantasy, and religiosity. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9621-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blogowska, J., & Saroglou, V. (2011). Religious fundamentalism and limited prosociality as a function of the target. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,50, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01551.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewer, G., & Hendrie, C. A. (2011). Evidence to suggest that copulatory vocalizations in women are not a reflexive consequence of orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9632-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal,40, 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology,7, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chadwick, S. B., & van Anders, S. M. (2017). Do women’s orgasms function as a masculinity achievement for men? Journal of Sex Research,54, 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1283484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, E. B., Fenigstein, A., & Fauber, R. L. (2014). The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior,43, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0212-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology,35, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex. New York: Vintage Books. (Originally published 1952)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dietz, E., & Böhning, D. (2000). On estimation of the Poisson parameter in zero-modified Poisson models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,34, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00111-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellsworth, R. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Human female orgasm as evolved signal: A test of two hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 1545–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0152-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fahs, B. (2014). ‘Freedom to’ and ‘freedom from’: A new vision for sex-positive politics. Sexualities,17, 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713516334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitz, C. C., & Zucker, A. N. (2015). Everyday exposure to benevolent sexism and condom use among college women. Women and Health,55, 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2014.996721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, C. A. (1976). Some aspects and implications of coital physiology. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,2, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926237608405323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frith, H. (2015). Orgasmic bodies: The orgasm in contemporary western culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frith, H. (2018). Faking, finishing and forgetting. Sexualities,21, 697–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717708149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geyer, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2005). Religion, morality, and self-control: Values, virtues, and vices. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 412–432). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly,26, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman, D. L., Gillath, O., & Haj-Mohamadi, P. (2017). Development and validation of the Pretending Orgasm Reasons Measure. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 1973–1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0928-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haidt, J., & Hersh, M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,31, 191–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02489.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review,14, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2016). On the link between benevolent sexism and orgasm frequency in heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 1923–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0780-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jern, P., Hakala, O., Kärnä, A., & Gunst, A. (2018). A longitudinal assessment of associations between women’s tendency to pretend orgasm, orgasm function, and intercourse-related pain in different partner relationship constellations. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1117-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 1121–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9874-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lafrance, M. N., Stelzl, M., & Bullock, K. (2017). “I’m not gonna fake it”: University women’s accounts of resisting the normative practice of faking orgasm. Psychology of Women Quarterly,41, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316683520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindsey, L. L. (2015). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence,27, 675–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McCoy, M. G., Welling, L. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the reasons for pretending orgasm inventory. Evolutionary Psychology,13, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McKibbin, W. F., Bates, V. M., Shackelford, T. K., Hafen, C. A., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2010). Risk of sperm competition moderates the relationship between men’s satisfaction with their partner and men’s interest in their partner’s copulatory orgasm. Personality and Individual Differences,49, 961–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research,47, 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903171794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nicolson, P., & Burr, J. (2003). What is ‘normal’ about women’s (hetero) sexual desire and orgasm?: A report of an in-depth interview study. Social Science and Medicine,57, 1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00012-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Olatunji, B. O. (2008). Disgust, scrupulosity and conservative attitudes about sex: Evidence for a mediational model of homophobia. Journal of Research in Personality,42, 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rudman, L. A., & Fetterolf, J. C. (2014). Gender and sexual economics: Do women view sex as a female commodity? Psychological Science,25, 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sakalli, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles,44, 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295109711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Salisbury, C. M., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research,51, 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.838934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sherlock, J. M., Sidari, M. J., Harris, E. A., Barlow, F. K., & Zietsch, B. P. (2016). Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: Disentangling traits and behaviours. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology,6. https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v6.31562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shirazi, T., Renfro, K. J., Lloyd, E., & Wallen, K. (2018). Women’s experience of orgasm during intercourse: Question semantics affect women’s reports and men’s estimates of orgasm occurrence. Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sibley, C. G. (2009). The New Zealand attitudes and values study 2009: Questionnaire items and details for researchers. Retrieved February 27, 2019 from http://www.socialpsychology.org/download/5810/NZAVSTechnicalReport2009QuestionnaireItems.pdf.

  43. Simms, L. J. (2008). Classical and modern methods of psychological scale construction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,2, 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00044.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomas, E. J., Stelzl, M., & Lafrance, M. N. (2017). Faking to finish: Women’s accounts of feigning sexual pleasure to end unwanted sex. Sexualities,20, 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour,50, 1601–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80014-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society,1, 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,23, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239708405314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Willis, M., Jozkowski, K. N., Lo, W. J., & Sanders, S. A. (2018). Are women’s orgasms hindered by phallocentric imperatives? Archives of Sexual Behavior,47, 1565–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Woo, J. S., Morshedian, N., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2012). Sex guilt mediates the relationship between religiosity and sexual desire in East Asian and Euro-Canadian college-aged women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 1485–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9918-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yang, H., Li, R., Zucker, R. A., & Buu, A. (2016). Two-stage model for time varying effects of zero-inflated count longitudinal covariates with applications in health behaviour research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics),65, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily A. Harris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to report for this study.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, E.A., Hornsey, M.J., Larsen, H.F. et al. Beliefs About Gender Predict Faking Orgasm in Heterosexual Women. Arch Sex Behav 48, 2419–2433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01510-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Faking orgasm
  • Ideology
  • Hostile sexism
  • Benevolent sexism
  • Gender