Abstract
Despite midlife adults accounting for a substantial and growing segment of the population, few large-scale studies have investigated factors which distinguish highly satisfying relationships from less satisfying ones in midlife. In a subsample of partnered 40–59-year-old Canadians (705 men, 743 women), relationship characteristics, sexual activity and communication, and health were investigated individually and simultaneously as predictors of high emotional and sexual satisfaction. Though the vast majority of participants reported being at least somewhat satisfied in their current relationship, less than half reported high satisfaction. For men and women, high emotional and sexual satisfactions were strongly linked. Logistic regressions indicated that longer relationships, dating relationships, and greater subjective overall health predicted high emotional satisfaction for men, whereas older age, married or cohabiting relationships, and frequent sexual communication predicted high emotional satisfaction for women. All types of sexual activities (minus penile–anal intercourse) were bivariately related to high emotional and sexual satisfaction. More frequent partnered sexual activity predicted high emotional and sexual satisfaction for men and women in regression analyses. More frequent sexual communication predicted high emotional satisfaction for women and high sexual satisfaction for both men and women. Newer relationships were more sexually satisfying for men. Postmenopausal women were less likely to be highly sexually satisfied. Findings suggest that physical health conditions are not generally related to high levels of satisfaction in midlife couples and that frequently discussing sex and engaging in (any) sexual activity with a partner are key components of highly satisfying relationships.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77, 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_13.
Blumenstock, S. M., & Papp, L. M. (2017). Sexual distress and marital quality of newlyweds: An investigation of sociodemographic moderators. Family Relations,66, 794–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12285.
Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485.
Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research,36, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551983.
Carpenter, L. M., Nathanson, C. A., & Kim, Y. J. (2009). Physical women, emotional men: Gender and sexual satisfaction in midlife. Archives of Sexual Behavior,38, 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9215-y.
Coffelt, T. A., & Hess, J. A. (2013). Sexual disclosures: Connections to relational satisfaction and closeness. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,40, 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.811449.
Conley, T. D., Roesch, S. C., Peplau, L. A., & Gold, M. S. (2009). A test of positive illusions versus shared reality models of relationship satisfaction among gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,39, 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00488.x.
Debrot, A., Meuwly, N., Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Schoebi, D. (2017). More than just sex: Affection mediates the association between sexual activity and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216684124.
DeLamater, J., Hyde, J. S., & Fong, M.-C. (2008). Sexual satisfaction in the seventh decade of life. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,34, 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230802156251.
England, P., & McClintock, E. A. (2009). The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review,35, 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00309.x.
Fisher, W. A., Donahue, K. L., Long, J. S., Heiman, J. R., Rosen, R. C., & Sand, M. S. (2014). Individual and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife couples: Dyadic analysis of the international survey of relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0426-8.
Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z.
George, W. H., Norris, J., Nguyen, H. V., Tatiana, N., & Davis, K. C. (2014). Sexuality and health. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 655–696). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-021.
Greeff, A. P., & Malherbe, H. L. (2001). Intimacy and marital satisfaction in spouses. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,27, 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262301750257100.
Günzler, C., Kriston, L., Harms, A., & Berner, M. M. (2009). Association of sexual functioning and quality of partnership in patients in cardiovascular rehabilitation: A gender perspective. Journal of Sexual Medicine,6, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01039.x.
Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S., & Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010a). An event-level analysis of the sexual characteristics and composition among adults ages 18 to 59: Results from a national probability sample in the United States. Journal of Sexual Medicine,7(5 suppl.), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02020.x.
Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010b). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14–94. Journal of Sexual Medicine,7, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02012.x.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 38, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955359.
Janssen, E., McBride, K. R., Yarber, W., Hill, B. J., & Butler, S. M. (2008). Factors that influence sexual arousal in men: A focus group study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9245-5.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality und stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Rovine, M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology,19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314.
Lister, Z., Fox, C., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). Couples and diabetes: A 30-year narrative review of dyadic relational research. Contemporary Family Therapy,35, 613–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-013-9250-x.
MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2005). Dyadic assessment of sexual self-disclosure and sexual satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,22(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505050942.
MacNeil, S., & Byers, E. S. (2009). Role of sexual self-disclosure in the sexual satisfaction of long-term heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398399.
Mark, K. P., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, J. D., Sanders, S. A., & Reece, M. (2014). A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research,51, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261.
McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6.
Metz, M. E., & McCarthy, B. W. (2007). The “Good-Enough Sex” model for couple sexual satisfaction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy,22, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990601013492.
Montesi, J. L., Fauber, R. L., Gordon, E. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2011). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,28, 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510386833.
Muise, A., Kim, J. J., McNulty, J. K., & Impett, E. A. (2016a). The positive implications of sex for relationships. In C. R. Knee & H. Reis (Eds.), Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 124–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316212653.
Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016b). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science,7, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616462.
Murray, S. H., Milhausen, R. R., Graham, C. A., & Kuczynski, L. (2017). A qualitative exploration of factors that affect sexual desire among men aged 30 to 65 in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1168352.
Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R. R., McKay, A., & Holzapfel, S. (2018). Prevalence and predictors of sexual problems among midlife Canadian adults: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sexual Medicine,15, 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.03.086.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Ringa, V., Diter, K., Laborde, C., & Bajos, N. (2013). Women’s sexuality: From aging to social representations. Journal of Sexual Medicine,10, 2399–2408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12267.
Rosenbaum, T. Y. (2010). Musculoskeletal pain and sexual function in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine,7, 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01490.x.
Schwartz, P., Diefendorf, S., & McGlynn-Wright, A. (2014). Sexuality in aging. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 523–551). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14193-017.
Schwartz, P., Serafini, B. J., & Cantor, R. (2013). Sex in committed relationships. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (Vol. 5, pp. 131–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3_8.
Seldin, D. R., Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2002). Sexual activity as a predictor of life-span mortality risk. Personality and Individual Differences,33, 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00164-7.
Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research,39, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552141.
Statistics Canada. (2015). Population projections for Canada (2013 to 2063), provinces and territories (2013 to 2038). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12029.
Stroope, S., McFarland, M. J., & Uecker, J. E. (2015). Marital characteristics and the sexual relationships of U.S. older adults: An analysis of National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project data. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0379-y.
Štulhofer, A., Ferreira, L. C., & Landripet, I. (2014). Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2013.870335.
Weiss, R. L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment, and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 229–271). Greenwish, CT: JAI Press.
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2013). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072.
Funding
The study and study questionnaire were designed by the third and fourth authors in consultation with the Trojan Sexual Health Division of Church & Dwight Canada to better understand the sexual health needs of midlife adult Canadians. The funder did not restrict the scope or content of the survey, nor did they restrict in any way the publication of the findings. The Sex Information and Education Council of Canada (SIECCAN) received an unrestricted resource development grant from Church & Dwight Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blumenstock, S.M., Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R.R. et al. High Emotional and Sexual Satisfaction Among Partnered Midlife Canadians: Associations with Relationship Characteristics, Sexual Activity and Communication, and Health. Arch Sex Behav 49, 953–967 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01498-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01498-9