Abstract
In women, the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is an indicator of attractiveness, health, youthfulness, and reproductive potential. In the current study, we hypothesized that viewing angle and body postures influence the attractiveness of these forms based on the view dependency of WHR stimuli (vdWHR). Using eye tracking, we quantified the number of fixations and dwell time on 3D images of a female avatar in two different poses (standing and contrapposto) from eight viewing angles incrementing in 45 degrees of rotation. A total of 68 heterosexual individuals (25 men and 43 women) participated in the study. Results showed that the contrapposto pose was perceived as more attractive than the standing pose and that lower vdWHR sides of the stimuli attracted more first fixation, total fixations, and dwell time. Overall, the results supported that WHR is view-dependent and vdWHRs lower than optimal WHRs are supernormal stimuli that may generate peak shifts in responding. Results are discussed in terms of the attractiveness of women’s movements (gaits and dance) and augmented artistic presentations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bovet, J., Lao, J., Bartholomée, O., Caldara, R., & Raymond, M. (2016). Mapping female bodily features of attractiveness. Scientific Reports,6, 18551. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18551.
Bovet, J., & Raymond, M. (2015). Preferred women’s waist-to-hip ratio variation over the last 2500 years. PLoS ONE,10(4), e0123284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123284.
Brooks, R. C., Shelly, J. P., Jordan, J. A., & Dixson, B. J. W. (2015). The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem. Evolution and Human Behavior,36, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.001.
Cashdan, E. (2008). Waist-to-hip ratio across cultures: Trade-offs between androgen- and estrogen dependent traits. Current Anthropology,49, 1098–1106. https://doi.org/10.1086/593036.
Cazzato, V., Siega, S., & Urgesi, C. (2012). “What women like”: Influence of motion and form on esthetic body perception. Frontiers in Psychology,3, 235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00235.
Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J. B., Kiviniemi, V., George, H. R., & Tovée, M. J. (2009). Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio. Evolution and Human Behavior,30, 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.003.
Costa, M., & Corazza, L. (2006). Aesthetic phenomena as supernormal stimuli: The case of eye, lip, and lower-face size and roundness in artistic portraits. Perception,35, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3449.
Derenne, A., Breitstein, R. M., & Cicha, R. J. (2008). Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on female waist-to-hip ratios. Psychological Record,58, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-485.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007a). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology,19, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20584.
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Morgan, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007b). Human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in Bakossiland, Cameroon. Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9093-8.
Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0516-2.
Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature,21, 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9100-6.
Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011a). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5.
Dixson, B. J., Vasey, P. L., Sagata, K., Sibanda, N., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011b). Men’s preferences for women’s breast morphology in New Zealand, Samoa, and Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9680-6.
Doyle, J. F. (2009a). A woman’s walk: Attractiveness in motion. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology,3, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099329.
Doyle, J. F. (2009b). Physical attractiveness ranges: Standing and contrapposto pose waist-to-hip ratio in 360° and pairs. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/31105690/Physical_Attractiveness_Ranges_Standing_and_Contrapposto_Pose_Waist-to-Hip_Ratio_in_360_and_Pairs.pdf.
Doyle, J. F. [Ethomotion]. (2010a). Waist-hip ratio in biological motion [Video playlist]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLppqXqNObO6tUICooCq7jR6jZHpE6PWj5.
Doyle, J. F. (2010b). Re: Favoring rationality over supernatural beliefs [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/human-ethology/conversations/messages/25112.
Doyle, J. F., & Pazhoohi, F. (2012). Natural and augmented breasts: Is what is not natural most attractive? Human Ethology Bulletin, 27(4), 4–14. Retrieved from http://ishe.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/HEB_2012_27_4_4-14.pdf.
Fink, B., Hugill, N., & Lange, B. P. (2012). Women’s body movements are a potential cue to ovulation. Personality and Individual Differences,53, 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.005.
Furnham, A., McClelland, A., & Omer, L. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ratings of perceived fecundity and sexual attractiveness as a function of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Psychology, Health & Medicine,8, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354850031000087609.
Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences,22, 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00241-3.
Ghirlanda, S., & Enquist, M. (2003). A century of generalization. Animal Behaviour,66, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2174.
Grillot, R. L., Simmons, Z. L., Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2014). Hormonal and morphological predictors of women’s body attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior,35, 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.01.001.
Guéguen, N. (2015). High heels increase women’s attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 2227–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0422-z.
Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042606.
Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., et al. (2016). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior,38, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.002.
Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: Replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences,19, 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00093-L.
Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences,28, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00115-4.
Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings: Biological Sciences,271, 1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2712.
Kościński, K. (2013). Attractiveness of women’s body: Body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance. Behavioral Ecology,24, 914–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art016.
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2016). What makes Jessica Rabbit sexy? Contrasting roles of waist and hip size. Evolutionary Psychology,14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916643459.
Marković, S., & Bulut, T. (2017). Attractiveness of the female body: Preference for the average or the supernormal? Psihologija,50, 403–426. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1703403M.
Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis: The human breast as an honest signal of residual reproductive value. Human Nature,9, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1005-2.
Marlowe, F., Apicella, C., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior,26, 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.005.
Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001). Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and Individual Differences,30, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00039-8.
McCarty, K., Darwin, H., Cornelissen, P. L., Saxton, T. K., Tovée, M. J., Caplan, N., et al. (2017). Optimal asymmetry and other motion parameters that characterise high-quality female dance. Scientific Reports,7, 42435. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42435.
Miller, G., Tybur, J. M., & Jordan, B. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior,28, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.002.
Morán, C., Hernández, E., Ruíz, J. E., Fonseca, M. E., Bermúdez, J. A., & Zárate, A. (1999). Upper body obesity and hyperinsulinemia are associated with anovulation. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation,47, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000010052.
Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior,34, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.006.
Pawłowski, B., & Grabarczyk, M. (2003). Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Human Biology,15, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.10136.
Pazhoohi, F., Doyle, J. F., Macedo, A. F., & Arantes, J. (2018). Arching the back (lumbar curvature) as a female sexual proceptivity signal: An eye-tracking study. Evolutionary Psychological Science,4, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0123-7.
Pazhoohi, F., & Liddle, J. R. (2012). Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology,6, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099212.
Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). A brief tour of human consciousness: From impostor poodles to purple numbers. New York: Pi Press.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies,6(6–7), 15–51.
Röder, S., Carbon, C.-C., Shackelford, T. K., Pisanski, K., Weege, B., & Fink, B. (2016). Men’s visual attention to and perceptions of women’s dance movements. Personality and Individual Differences,101, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.025.
Singh, D. (1993a). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65, 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293.
Singh, D. (1993b). Body shape and women’s attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature,4, 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692203.
Singh, D. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuroendocrinology Letters Special Issue,23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.
Singh, D. (2006). Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery,33, 359–370.
Singh, D., Dixson, B. J., Jessop, T. S., Morgan, B., & Dixson, A. F. (2010). Cross-cultural consensus for waist–hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior,31, 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.001.
Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women’s attractiveness. Human Nature,6, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734135.
Smeets, J. B. J., & Hooge, I. T. C. (2003). Nature of variability in saccades. Journal of Neurophysiology,90, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01075.2002.
Staddon, J. E. R. (1975). A note on the evolutionary significance of “supernormal” stimuli. The American Naturalist,109, 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1086/283025.
Swami, V., Grant, N., & Furnham, A. (2007). Perfectly formed? The effect of manipulating the waist-to-hip ratios of famous paintings and sculptures. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,27, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.27.1.e.
Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the waist-to-hip-ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science,9, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00029.
Tinbergen, N. (1948). Social releasers and the experimental method required for their study. The Wilson Bulletin,60(1), 6–51.
Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). The mystery of female beauty. Nature,399, 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/20345.
Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology,92, 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712601162257.
Tovée, M. J., Hancock, P., Mahmoodi, S., Singleton, B. R. R., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2002). Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B,269, 2205–2213. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2133.
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,266, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0624.
Wass, P., Waldenström, U., Rössner, S., & Hellberg, D. (1997). An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction,12, 2057–2060. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMREP/12.9.2057.
Wenzlaff, F., Briken, P., & Dekker, A. (2016). Video-based eye tracking in sex research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Sex Research,53, 1008–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1107524.
Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior,20, 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00007-0.
Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature,396, 321–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/24512.
Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., et al. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal,306, 484–487. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484.
Acknowledgement
FP receives funding from FCT Portugal through grant PD/BD/114366/2016; AM receives funding from FCT Portugal through grants PTDC/DTP-EPI/0412/2012 and PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011; JA receives funding from FCT Portugal through grants PTDC/MHC-PCN/4589/2012 and IF/01298/2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pazhoohi, F., Macedo, A.F., Doyle, J.F. et al. Waist-to-Hip Ratio as Supernormal Stimuli: Effect of Contrapposto Pose and Viewing Angle. Arch Sex Behav 49, 837–847 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01486-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01486-z