Abstract
People’s motives for casual sex moderate associations between their sexual behavior and the outcomes they experience. Derived from self-determination theory, autonomous motives for casual sex (e.g., I wanted the fun and enjoyment) and non-autonomous motives (e.g., I wanted to please someone else) correlated in previous research differentially with measures of well-being and incidence of casual sex. In a sample of American college students (N = 284), we replicated these prior findings and extended them as follows: autonomous and non-autonomous motives for sex were correlated with two measures of casual sex (i.e., the three behavior questions from the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory; the number of partners with whom participants had penetrative sex but did not wish to become emotionally involved); two measures of well-being (i.e., self-esteem, depression), and a measure of overall sexual victimization (i.e., a combined score from the Sexual Experiences Survey). We found that autonomous motives were more strongly associated with casual sexual behavior than were non-autonomous motives in both sexes. Autonomous motives were positively associated with sexual victimization in women but not in men. Compared to autonomous motives, sex for non-autonomous motives was linked to less self-esteem in both sexes, and with more depression and sexual victimization in women. Sex differences in associations between motives and victimization persisted even when the general effects of participant’s sex and casual sex were controlled in hierarchical regressions. Our findings further revealed the importance of agency (or lack thereof) in predicting sexual behavior and psychological health.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Subscale analyses/data can be obtained by contacting the first author.
References
Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior,9, 271–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-1789(03)00011-9.
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004). College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,5, 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838003262331.
Arakawa, D. R., Flanders, C., Hatfield, E., & Heck, R. (2013). Positive psychology: What impact has it had on sex research publication trends? Sexuality and Culture,17, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9152-3.
Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & Sweeney, B. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems,53, 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review,8, 77–100.
Bersamin, M. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Schwartz, S. J., Donnellan, M. B., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R. S., … Caraway, S. J. (2013). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? The Journal of Sex Research,51, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.772088.
Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry,6, 1–30.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.20.
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2013). Backlash from the bedroom: Stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly,37, 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312467169.
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research,40, 13–26.
Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology,148, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.148.1.77-90.
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hook-ups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2003). Health behaviors and reproductive health risk within adolescent sexual dyads. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 279–296). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Furman, W., & Collibee, C. (2014). Sexual activity with romantic and nonromantic partners and psychosocial adjustment in young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior,43, 1327–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0293-3.
Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Poore, J., von Hippel, W., Buss, D. M., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2013). Sexual regret: Evidence for evolved sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0019-3.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality,58, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x.
Garcia, J. R., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Why we hook up: Searching for sex or looking for love? In S. Tarrant (Ed.), Gender, sex, and politics: In the streets and between the sheets in the 21st century (pp. 238–250). New York: Routledge.
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology,16, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911.
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., & Camilleri, J. K. (2008). Proximate and ultimate explanations are required for a comprehensive understanding of partner rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior,13, 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.002.
Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research,43, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324.
Hatfield, E., Hutchison, E. S. S., Bensman, L., Young, D., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). Cultural, social, and gender influences on casual sex: New developments. In J. M. Turner & A. D. Mitchell (Eds.), Social psychology: New developments (pp. 1–37). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences,33, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152x.
Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. M. K. (1993). Gender differences in casual sex and AIDS prevention: A survey of dating bars. Journal of Sex Research,30, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499309551676.
Jenks, R. J. (1998). Swinging: a review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior,27, 507–521.
Johnson, M. D. (2013). Parent–child relationship quality directly and indirectly influences hooking up behavior reported in young adulthood through alcohol use in adolescence. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 1463–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0098-9.
Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 1407–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0189-7.
Jonason, P. K., & Balzarini, R. (2016). Unweaving the rainbow of human sexuality. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 13–28). New York: Springer.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise between men and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research,46, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902775827.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2010). Positioning the booty-call on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research,46, 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2010.497984.
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,15, 1–29.
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., … White, J. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly,31, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x.
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., … White, J. (2008). Erratum. Psychology of Women Quarterly,32, 493.
Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.
Owen, J. J., Quirk, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2014). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,40, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2012.751074.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, A. (2002). The causalities of “casual” sex” A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,19, 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195006.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,95, 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology,7, 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology,49, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012753.
Sandberg-Thoma, S. E., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2014). Casual sexual relationships and mental health in adolescence and emerging adulthood. The Journal of Sex Research,51, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.821440.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,28, 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x05000051.
Schmitt, D. P., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Attachment and sexual permissiveness: Exploring differential associations across genders, cultures, and facets of short-term mating. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,46, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114551052.
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality,47, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.
Thornhill, N., & Thornhill, R. (1992). The evolutionary psychology of men’s coercive sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069120.
Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 173–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.
Townsend, J. M., Wasserman, T. H., & Rosenthal, A. (2015). Gender differences in emotional reactions and sexual coercion in casual sexual relations: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences,85, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.031.
Uecker, J. E., Pearce, L. D., & Andercheck, B. (2015). The four U’s: Latent classes of hookup motivations among college students. Social Currents,2, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496515579761.
Vrangalova, Z. (2015). Does casual sex harm college students’ well-being? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin,128, 699–727.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Townsend, J.M., Jonason, P.K. & Wasserman, T.H. Associations Between Motives for Casual Sex, Depression, Self-Esteem, and Sexual Victimization. Arch Sex Behav 49, 1189–1197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01482-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01482-3