Abstract
According to the possible selves theory, individuals have possible selves that they hope to attain, or feared selves they hope to avoid, in the proximal future. In addition, individuals may have strategies they use to help them attain these possible selves or avoid their feared selves. Recent work has applied this theory to the realm of sexuality (i.e., sexual possible selves; SPS) in the developmental period of emerging adulthood, as this period is considered a time of increased sexual identity development. The purpose of this study was to extend this research by conducting semi-structured qualitative interviews with a sample of first-semester college-attending emerging adults (N = 35) at a 4-year university. We examined the developmental influences on expected and feared SPS to better understand why various internalized expectations develop. Interviews were conducted during the first four weeks of the Fall 2016 semester and were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Prominent themes that emerged within the expected SPS included: sex and commitment, taking a passive approach, delaying sex and relationships, plans for hooking up, and abstinence. Feared SPS themes that emerged included: non-committed sexual avoidance, sexual assault/coercion, reputation, and sexual health. Prominent influences on participants’ SPS included: family, alcohol and parties, peers/friends, past experiences, changes in expectations, college culture, and religion. Implications for sexuality research, education, and intervention are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anders, K. M., Olmstead, S. B., & Johnson, E. I. (2017). The sexual possible selves and strategies of first-semester college students: What do they hope for and fear and how do they plan to get there? Journal of Sex Research, 54, 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1188877.
Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Aubrey, J. S., & Smith, S. E. (2013). Development and validation of the endorsement of the hookup culture index. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.637246.
Bailey, J., Fleming, C., Henson, J., Catalano, R., & Haggerty, K. (2008). Sexual risk behavior 6 months post-high school: Associations with college attendance, living with a parent, and prior risk behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/jadohealth.2007.11.138.
Barriger, M., & Velez-Blasini, C. J. (2013). Descriptive and injunctive social norm overestimation in hooking up and their role as predictors of hook-up activity in a college student sample. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.607928.
Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://ww.edc.org/hec/socialnorms/theory.html.
Bordini, G. S., & Sperb, T. M. (2013). Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality and Culture, 17, 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-012-9163-0.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davies, J., Zhu, H., & Brantley, B. (2007). Sex appeals that appeal: Negative sexual self-schema as a moderator of the priming effects of sexual ads on accessibility. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 29, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1018/10641734.2007.10505218.
Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex:” Men’s negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902775801.
Exner, D., & Cummings, N. (2011). Implications for sexual assault prevention: College students as prosocial bystanders. Journal of American College Health, 59, 655–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.515633.
Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
Fielder, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. P., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Predictors of sexual hookups: A theory-based, prospective study of first-year college women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1225–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0106-0.
Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D’Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S., … Stine, E. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506295354.
Frazier, L. D., Hooker, K., Johnson, P. M., & Kaus, C. R. (2000). Continuity and change in possible selves in later life: A 5-year longitudinal study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2203_10.
Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 2, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099345.
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hendry, L. B., & Kloep, M. (2010). How universal is emerging adulthood? An empirical example. Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903295067.
Hultgren, B. A., Cleveland, M., Turrisi, R., & Mallet, K. (2014). How estimated of drinking can influence alcohol-related consequences experienced over freshman year of college. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 38, 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12351.
Jun, M., Agley, J., Huang, C., & Gassman, R. A. (2016). College binge drinking and social norms: Advancing understanding through statistical applications. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 25, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067828X.2014.926849.
Kenyon, D. B., & Koerner, S. S. (2009). Examining emerging-adults’ and parents’ expectations about autonomy during the transition to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409333021.
Klipfel, K. M., Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2014). Interpersonal aggression victimization within casual sexual relationships and experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505207.
Kubicek, K., Beyer, W. J., Weiss, G., Iverson, E., & Kipke, M. D. (2010). In the dark: Young men’s stories of sexual initiation in the absence of relevant sexual health information. Health Education & Behavior, 37, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109339993.
Lambert, T., Kahn, A., & Apple, K. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552174.
Lyons, H. A., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2014). Young adult casual sexual behavior: Life-course-specific motivations and consequences. Sociological Perspectives, 57, 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121413517557.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.
Meston, C. M., Heiman, J. R., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Socially desirable responding and sexuality self-reports. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551928.
Moser, K., Pearson, M. R., Hustad, J. T. P., & Borsari, B. (2014). Drinking games, tailgating, and pregaming: Precollege predictors of risky college drinking. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 40, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2014.936443.
Napper, L. E., Kenney, S. R., & LaBrie, J. W. (2015). The longitudinal relationships among injunctive norms and hooking up attitudes and behaviors in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.952809.
Olmstead, S. B., Anders, K. M., & Conrad, K. A. (2017). Meanings for sex and commitment among first semester college men and women: A mixed-methods analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0777-4.
Olmstead, S. B., Conrad, K. A., & Anders, K. M. (2017). First semester college students’ definitions of and expectations for engaging in hookups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33, 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417698571.
Olmstead, S. B., Roberson, P. N. E., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). Hooking up and risk behaviors among first semester college men: What is the role of precollege experience? Journal of Sex Research, 52, 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.843147.
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., Terry, K., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00057-6.
Oyserman, D., & Fryberg, S. (2006). The possible selves of diverse adolescents: Content and function across gender, race, and national origin. In C. Dunkel & J. Kerpelman (Eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 17–39). Huntington, NY: Nova.
Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2009). Possible selves: From content to process. In K. Markman, W. Klein, & J. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental stimulation (pp. 373–394). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Oyserman, D., Johnson, E., & James, L. (2011). Seeing the destination but not the path: Effects of socioeconomic disadvantage on school-focused possible self content and linked behavioral strategies. Self and Identity, 10, 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2010.487651.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves in balance: Implications for delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.112.
Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., Cooper, M. L., & Lee, C. M. (2011). Measurement of motivations for and against sexual behavior. Assessment, 18, 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110372298.
Reckdenwald, A., Ford, J. A., & Murray, B. N. (2016). Alcohol use in emerging adulthood: Can Moffitt’s developmental theory help us understand binge drinking among college students? Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 25, 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1067828X.2015.1103347.
Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v11n01_01.
Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. R. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800307.
Roberson, P. N. E., Olmstead, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). Hooking up during the college years: Is there a pattern? Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 17, 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.972458.
Stinson, R. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568220903558596.
Twenge, J., Sherman, R., & Wells, B. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2273–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2.
United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018, April). College enrollment and work activity of recent high school and college graduates—2017 [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/hsgec.nr0.htm.
Vander Ven, T. (2011). Getting wasted: Why college students drink too much and party so hard. New York, NY: New York University Press.
White, J. M., Klein, D. M., & Martin, T. F. (2015). Family theories (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
White, A. M., Kraus, C. L., & Swartzwelder, H. S. (2006). Many college freshman drink at levels far beyond the binge threshold. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00122.x.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Kayley N. Davis for her work in transcribing interviews analyzed in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anders, K.M., Olmstead, S.B. A Qualitative Examination of the Sexual Possible Selves and Strategies of First-Semester College Students: How Sexual Possible Selves are Developed During the Transition to College. Arch Sex Behav 48, 1859–1876 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1332-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1332-2