Abstract
The dual control model of sexual response proposes two factors, sexual excitation (SE) and sexual inhibition (SI), that aim to predict sexual behavior and response. While SE and SI are described as stable traits that influence sexuality-related outcomes such as sexual function or sexual risk taking, only a few studies have presented data on the stability of these factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal stability of SE and SI, and to investigate whether changes in sexual function or partnership status influence SE and SI in a longitudinal sample of women. To address these research questions, the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) was administered five times over the course of 4 years. The SESII-W includes two main scales of SE and SI which consist of five (Arousability, Partner characteristics, Sexual power dynamics, Smell, and Setting) and three subscales (Concerns about sexual function, Arousal contingency, Relationship importance), respectively. Data from 553 women (Mage = 31.38 years, SD = 10.25, range = 18–67) who participated in at least two assessment points were included in this study. Bivariate correlations between baseline and the fifth follow-up assessment indicated a high temporal stability of SE and SI in women (.47 < r < .71). A series of generalized linear models were conducted to investigate the impact of time, changes in sexual function, partnership status, and changes in partnership status on SE and SI. Partner characteristics (SE) that showed small increases over time. Across different subscales, improvements in sexual function were associated with higher SE and lower SI. Changes in partnership status and partnership status itself were predictors of one SE- and three SI-related scales. This study suggests a relatively high temporal stability of SE and SI in women and supports the dual control model’s assertion that both factors are stable individual traits. Certain life events such as a new partnership or sexual difficulties may, however, impact time stability of both factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
01 March 2019
The authors would like to issue a correction for a statement made in the conclusion section of the paper entitled “Temporal stability of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition in women”. As one might expect and as rightly stated throughout the paper, our study suggests that improvements in sexual function might increase sexual excitation and decrease sexual inhibition in women, not the other way around.
References
Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2009). The dual control model: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747222.
Bancroft, J., Herbenick, D., Barnes, T., Hallam-Jones, R., Wylie, K., & Janssen, E. (2005). The relevance of the dual control model to male sexual dysfunction: The Kinsey Institute/BASRT Collaborative Project. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 13–30.
Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00024-5.
Berner, M. M., Kriston, L., Zahradnik, H.-P., Härter, M., & Rohde, A. (2004). Überprüfung der Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit des deutschen Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) [Inspection of the validity and reliability of the German Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d)]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 64, 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815815.
Bloemendaal, L. B. A., & Laan, E. T. M. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) within a Dutch population. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.826166.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
DeLamater, J. (2012). Sexual expression in later life: A review and synthesis. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.603168.
Fraley, R. C., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.60.
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Biological Sciences, 265, 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380.
Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2000). Effects of fragrance on female sexual arousal and mood across the menstrual cycle. Psychophysiology, 37, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577200981964.
Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9041-7.
IBM. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for macintosh. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Janssen, E. (2011). Sexual arousal in men: A review and conceptual analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 708–716.
Janssen, E., & Bancroft, J. (2007). The dual-control model: The role of sexual inhibition and excitation in sexual arousal and behavior. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 197–222). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552130.
Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R. R., & Graham, C. A. (2016). Examining the psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) in a sample of lesbian and bisexual women. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 836–848.
Kenny, D. A. (2005). Cross-lagged panel design. New York: Wiley.
Klusmann, D. (2002). Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 275–287.
McCabe, M., Althof, S. E., Assalian, P., Chevret-Measson, M., Leiblum, S. R., Simonelli, C., & Wylie, K. R. (2016). Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 538–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019.
Morton, H., & Gorzalka, B. (2015). Role of partner novelty in sexual functioning: A review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 41, 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.958788.
Nicolosi, A., Laumann, E. O., Glasser, D. B., Moreira, E. D., Paik, A., & Gingell, C. (2004). Sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions after age 40: The Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Urology, 64, 991–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.055.
Page-Gould, E. (2016). Multilevel modeling. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 628–661). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415782.030.
Pinxten, W., & Lievens, J. (2015). An exploratory study of factors associated with sexual inhibition and excitation: Findings from a representative survey in Flanders. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.882880.
Pinxten, W., & Lievens, J. (2016). Gender differences in the development of sexual excitation and inhibition through the life course: Preliminary findings from a representative study in Flanders. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1063575.
Rosen, R. C., Brown, J., Heiman, S., Leiblum, C., Meston, R., Shabsigh, D., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Velten, J. (2017). The dual control model of sexual response: Relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition for sexual function. Current Sexual Health Reports, 9, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0108-3.
Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C. A., & Margraf, J. (2016a). Psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women in a German sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0547-8.
Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C. A., & Margraf, J. (2016b). Unprotected intercourse and one-night stands: Impact of sexual excitation, sexual inhibition, and atypical sexual arousal patterns on risky sexual behaviors in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.027.
Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C. A., & Margraf, J. (2017). Sexual excitation and sexual inhibition as predictors of sexual functioning: A cross sectional and longitudinal assessment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 43, 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2015.1115792.
Velten, J., Scholten, S., & Margraf, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men (SESII-W/M) and the Sexual Excitation Scales/Sexual Inhibition Scales Short Form (SIS/SES-SF) in a population-based sample in Germany. PLoS ONE2, 13, e0193080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193080.
Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. C. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230590475206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Velten, J., Zahler, L., Scholten, S. et al. Temporal Stability of Sexual Excitation and Sexual Inhibition in Women. Arch Sex Behav 48, 881–889 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1323-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1323-3