Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 795–801 | Cite as

Daily Sexual Desire and Its Impact on Next-Day Desire and Behavior in Mixed Sex Couples

  • Kristen P. MarkEmail author
  • Christine E. Leistner
  • Minhao Dai
Original Paper

Abstract

Sexual desire contributes to overall sexual and relational health among long-term romantic partnerships. However, little research has examined the nuances of partner-level sexual desire and behavior on a daily level, despite evidence that it ebbs and flows and is more of a state than a static characteristic. Additionally, daily sexual behavior and desire may impact women differently than men. Therefore, understanding individual and partner-level dynamics among men and women may provide a more nuanced understanding of sexual desire as a situational state in the context of long term couples. A sample of 87 mixed-sex couples (174 individuals; M age = 33 years) in long-term relationships (M = 9.33 years) completed a daily electronic report for 30 days and reported on their daily sexual desire and sexual behavior. A series of four stability influence actor partner interdependence models were conducted to investigate the individual and partner-level link between men and women’s daily levels of sexual desire and their sexual behavior and desire the following day. Findings indicated that daily sexual desire fuels sexual desire on the following day, particularly for men, regardless of whether sexual behavior was engaged in. Additionally, sexual desire on one day impacts next-day desire for partners, particularly on days when sexual behavior occurred. Contextual, partner-level contributing factors seem to have the largest impact on daily levels of sexual desire among long-term couples. Implications and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

Sexual desire Daily sexual desire Couples APIM Sexual behavior 

Notes

Funding

This study was made possible by a research grant awarded to the first author from The Patty Brisben Foundation for Women’s Sexual Health.

References

  1. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response. A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 51–65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Basson, R. (2002). Are our definitions of women’s desire, arousal and sexual pain disorders too broad and our definitions of orgasmic disorder too narrow? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basson, R., Leiblum, S., Brotto, L., Derogatis, L., Fourcroy, J., Fugl-Meyer, K., & Shultz, W. W. (2004). Revised definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 1(1), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brezsnyak, M., & Whisman, M. A. (2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 30, 199–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230490262393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caruso, S., Agnello, C., Malandrino, C., Lo Presti, L., Cicero, C., & Cianci, S. (2014). Do hormones influence women’s sex? Sexual activity over the menstrual cycle. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 601–619.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013969.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldhammer, D. L., & McCabe, M. P. (2011). A qualitative exploration of the meaning and experience of sexual desire among partnered women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20(1–2), 19–29.Google Scholar
  11. Hensel, D., He, F., Harezlak, J., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2016). Daily diary study of adult men’s and women’s event-level sexual motivations and sexual behavior. Sexual Health, 14, 147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Impett, E. A., Strachman, A., Finkel, E. J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Maintaining sexual desire in intimate relationships: The importance of approach goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 808–823.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jawed-Wessel, S., & Sevick, E. (2017). The impact of pregnancy and childbirth on sexual behavior: A systematic review. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1274715.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Laan, E., & Both, S. (2008). What makes women experience desire? Feminism and Psychology, 18(4), 505–514.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353508095533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mark, K. P. (2012). The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark, K. P. (2014). The impact of daily sexual desire and daily sexual desire discrepancy on the quality of the sexual experience in couples. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23, 27–33.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.23.1.A2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mark, K., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). The object of sexual desire: Examining the “what” in “what do you desire?” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 2709–2719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013a). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., & Desmarias, S. (2013b). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partners’ sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, S., & Milhausen, R. (2012). Factors impacting women’s sexual desire: Examining long-term relationships in emerging adulthood. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21(2), 101–115.Google Scholar
  22. Regan, P. C. (2000). The role of sexual desire and sexual activity in dating relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ridley, C. A., Cate, R. M., Collins, D. M., Reesing, A. L., Lucero, A. A., Gilson, M. S., & Almeida, D. M. (2006). The ebb and flow of marital lust: A relational approach. Journal of Sex Research, 43(2), 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. New York, NY: Stein & Day.Google Scholar
  25. Winston, R. (2004). Human. London: Dorling Kindersley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Health PromotionUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health and Community ServicesCalifornia State University ChicoChicoUSA
  3. 3.Department of CommunicationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations