Skip to main content
Log in

An Organizational Framework for Sexual Media’s Influence on Short-Term Versus Long-Term Sexual Quality

  • Target Article
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to this article was published on 07 March 2019

A Commentary to this article was published on 22 January 2019

A Commentary to this article was published on 08 January 2019

A Commentary to this article was published on 03 January 2019

A Commentary to this article was published on 02 January 2019

A Commentary to this article was published on 14 December 2018

Abstract

Although research has suggested a net negative influence of sexual media on sexual quality, enough researchers have found results suggesting that sexual media has no effect or a positive influence that the matter warrants further investigation. We present an organizational framework utilizing primarily the acquisition, activation, application model (3AM), and the Antecedents-Context-Effects model (ACE) to reconcile these apparently contradictory claims. By synthesizing these theories, we suggest that to truly understand the impact of sexual media on sexual quality, four factors must be taken into account: (1) the content of the sexual media being viewed, (2) the difference between short-term and long-term sexual quality, (3) the influence of exclusivity, formativeness, resonance, and reinforcement in moderating the extent to which the portrayed sexual script is applied (influences attitudes and behavior), and (4) the couple context for congruency of use, script application, and moral paradigms. While acknowledging the many nuances that should be considered, we ultimately argue that when considering these factors simultaneously, the overall scripts presented in sexual media are congruent with pursuing factors for short-term sexual quality and incongruent with pursuing factors for long-term sexual quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albury, K. (2014). Porn and sex education, porn as sex education. Porn Studies,1, 172–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2001). The social dimension of sex. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengry-Howell, A. (2012). Planet porn: A resource pack for working with teens around porn. Sex Education,12, 370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., & Derlgega, V. J. (1987). Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, S. R., Coulson, G., Keddington, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). The influence of pornography on sexual scripts and hooking up among emerging adults in college. Archive of Sexual Behavior,44, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, A. J., & Morokoff, P. J. (2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships,18, 562–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, A. J., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women,16, 1065–1085.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, G., & Ben-Zion, I. Z. (2014). Unusual masturbatory practice as an etiological factor in the diagnosis and treatment of sexual dysfunction in young men. Journal of Sexual Medicine,11, 1798–1806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G. R. (1995). The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. The centerfold syndrome: How men can overcome objectification and achieve intimacy with women. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, M., Stermer, S. P., & Burgess, S. R. (2007). Sex, lies, and video games: The portrayal of male and female characters on video game covers. Sex Roles,57, 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Marks, L. D., & Day, R. D. (2012). Sacred matters: Religion and spirituality in families. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., & Kohut, T. (2017). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology,13, 6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Busby, D. M., Willoughby, B. J., & Brown, C. C. (2017). The porn gap: Differences in men’s and women’s pornography patterns in couple relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy,16, 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C. D., Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research,23, 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (2012). Communcal (and exchange) relationships. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 232–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson, M., Lemaire, A., Pinton, P., Hamidi, K., & Klein, P. (2006). Sexual behaviors and mental perception, satisfaction and expectations of sex life in men and women in France. Journal of Sexual Medicine,3, 121–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T., & Ramsey, L. (2011). Killing us softly? Investigating portrayals of women and men in contemporary magazine advertisements. Psychology of Women Quarterly,35, 469–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity,7, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. L., Pioli, M., Levitt, A., Talley, A. E., Micheas, L., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Attachment styles, sex motives, and sexual behavior: Evidence for gender-specific expressions of attachment dynamics. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 243–274). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, J. N., & Mclean, S. (1996). Neuropeptides: Basic and clinical advances. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneback, K., Traeen, B., & Mansson, S. (2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior,38, 746–753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elise, D. (2017). Moving from within the maternal: The choreography of analytic eroticism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association,65, 33–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature,9, 23–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. E. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate selection. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 87–115). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., Mashek, D., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2002). Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Archives of Sexual Behavior,31, 413–419.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S., Quinn, D., & Twenge, J. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 269–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, C. M., & Aubrey, J. S. (2012). Race and genre in the use of sexual objectification in female artists’ music videos. Howard Journal of Communications,23, 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, N., & Paul, B. (2017). From orgasms to spanking: A content analysis of the agentic and objectifying sexual scripts in feminist, for women, and mainstream pornography. Sex Roles, 77, 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D. M., McClelland, S. I., & Dettmann, M. (2017). Sexual closeness discrepancies: What they are and why they matter for sexual well-being in romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2353–2364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, B. (1979). Effects of sexual enhancement workshop on young adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology,35, 873–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., & Impett, E. A. (2012). Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,6, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago, IL: Aldine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society,1, 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs, J. B., Braden, A. L., Kraus, S. W., Wilt, J. A., & Wright, P. J. (2017). Pornography and pleasure-seeking: Toward a hedonic reinforcement model. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/jevb7. Accessed 30 March 2018.

  • Grubbs, J. B., Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Hook, J. N., & Carlisle, R. D. (2015). Transgression as addiction: Religiosity and moral disapproval as predictors of perceived addiction to pornography. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 125–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior,37, 614–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, G. M., & Štulhofer, A. (2016). What types of pornography do people use and do they cluster? Assessing types and categories of pornography consumption in a large-scale online sample. Journal of Sex Research,53, 849–859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haste, P. (2013). Sex education and masculinity: The “problem” of boys. Gender and Education,25, 515–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture,15, 256–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. (1996). Sexuality, stress and the chemical architecture of the brain. Annual Review of Sex Research,7, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, K. M., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2014). Sexuality and religion. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology and sexuality (Vol. 2, pp. 425–447). Contextual approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information processing model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior,14, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). A structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior,28, 382–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. P., Strassberg, D. S., & Turner, C. M. (2004). Communication and associated relationship issues in female anorgasmia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,30, 263–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, M. J. E., & Peter, J. (2015). Gender (in)equality in internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic Internet videos. Journal of Sex Research,52, 721–735.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinplatz, P. J., Ménard, A. D., Paquet, M. P., Paradis, N., Campbell, M., Zuccarino, D., & Mehak, L. (2009). The components of optimal sexuality: A portrait of “great sex”. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,18, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, T. (2014). An empirical investigation of the concept of “pornography”. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2063/. Accessed 30 March 2018.

  • Kohut, T., & Fisher, W. A. (2013). The impact of brief exposure to sexually explicit video clips on partnered female clitoral self-stimulation, orgasm and sexual satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,22, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, T., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2017). Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Archives of Sexual Behavior,46, 585–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., Negash, S., Stillman, T. F., Olmstead, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,31, 410–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landripet, I., & Stulhofer, A. (2015). Is pornography use associated with sexual difficulties and dysfunctions among younger heterosexual men? Journal of Sexual Medicine,12, 1136–1139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, N. D., & Willoughby, B. J. (2017). Pornography, provocative sexual media, and their differing associations with multiple aspects of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265-407517739162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, N. D., & Willoughby, B. J. (2018). Longitudinal links between pornography use, marital importance, and permissive sexuality during emerging adulthood. Marriage & Family Review,54, 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhardt, N. D., Willoughby, B. J., & Young-Petersen, B. (2018). Damaged goods: Perception of pornography addiction as a mediator between religiosity and relationship anxiety surrounding pornography use. Journal of Sex Research,55, 357–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D., Prause, N., & Finn, P. (2014). The emperor has no clothes: A review of the “pornography addiction” model. Current Sexual Health Reports,6, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren-Martenson, L., & Mansson, S. A. (2010). Lust, love, and life: A qualitative study of Swedish adolescents’ perceptions and experiences with pornography. Journal of Sex Research,47, 568–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, A. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 441–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. A., & Luke, K. (2010). Gender differences in the ABC’s of the birds and the bees: What mothers teach young children about sexuality and reproduction. Sex Roles,62, 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B., & Thestrup, M. (2009). Men, intimacy, and eroticism. Journal of Sexual Medicine,6, 588–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, S. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 663–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2005). The objectification of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. Journal of Sex Research,42, 277–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2015). Methodological issues in defining aggression for content analyses of sexually explicit material. Archives of Sexual Behavior,44, 81–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, A. D., & Kleinplatz, P. J. (2008). Twenty-one moves guaranteed to make his thighs go up in flames: Depictions of “great sex” in popular magazines. Sexuality and Culture,12, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood, second edition: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesi, J. L., Conner, B. T., Gordon, E. A., Fauber, R. L., Kim, K. H., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). On the relationship among social anxiety, intimacy, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction in young couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, H., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). Role of partner novelty in sexual functioning: A review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,41, 593–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Good, giving, and game: The relationships benefits of communal sexual motivation. Social Psychological and Personality Sciences,6, 164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muise, A., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., & Desmarais, S. (2013). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science,4, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. P., Liotti, M., Ingmundson, P. T., Mayberg, H. S., Pu, Y., Zamarripa, F., et al. (2006). Children’s brain activations while viewing televised violence revealed by fMRI. Media Psychology,8, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muusses, L. D., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). Internet pornography and relationship quality: A longitudinal study of within and between partner effects of adjustment, sexual satisfaction, and sexually explicit internet material among newly-weds. Computers in Human Behavior,45, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carroll, J. S. (2010). “I believe it is wrong but I still do it”: A comparison of religious young men who do versus do not use pornography. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality,2, 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemetz, G. H., Craig, K. D., & Reith, G. (1978). Treatment of female sexual dysfunction through symbolic modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,46, 62–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newmahr, S. (2014). Eroticism as embodied emotion: The erotics of renaissance faire. Symbolic Interaction,37, 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. B., Negash, S., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Emerging adults’ expectations for pornography use in the context of future committed romantic relationships: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 625–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. Y., Wilson, G., Berger, J., Christman, M., Reina, B., Bishop, F., et al. (2016). Is internet pornography causing sexual dysfunctions? A review with clinical reports. Behavioral Science,6, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoal, P. M., Narciso, I. D., & Pereira, N. M. (2014). What is sexual satisfaction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. Journal of Sex Research,51, 22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). New York: Dover.

  • Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin,136, 21–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaus, J. G., Kippin, T. E., Coria-Avila, G. A., Gelez, H., Afonso, V. M., Ismail, N., & Parada, M. (2012). Who, what, where, when (and maybe even why)? How the experience of sexual reward connects sexual desire, preference, and performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 31–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaus, J. G., Scepkowski, L. A., Marson, L., & Georgiadis, J. R. (2014). Biology of the sexual response. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–203). Person-based approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prause, N., & Pfaus, J. (2015). Viewing sexual stimuli associated with greater sexual responsiveness, not erectile dysfunction. Sexual Medicine,3, 90–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prieler, M., & Centeno, D. (2013). Gender representation in Philippine television advertisements. Sex Roles,69, 276–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. E., Ortiz, R. R., & White, S. R. (2015). Emerging adults’ responses to active mediation of pornography during adolescence. Journal of Children and Media,9, 160–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M. D., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2016). Documenting pornography use in America: A comparative analysis of methodological approaches. Journal of Sex Research,53, 873–881.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B. (2015). Trends in evolutionary explanations for human male same-sex eroticism: A commentary on Riegel (2011). International Journal of Sexual Health,27, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabina, C., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2008). The nature and dynamics of internet pornography exposure for youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior,11, 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships,11, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarch, D. M. (1991). Constructing the sexual crucible: An integration of sexual and marital therapy. New York: W. W. Norton Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, M. B., Black, L., Smith, A. H., Wetterneck, C. T., & Wells, D. E. (2012). A review of internet pornography use research: Methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,15, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankiewicz, J., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles,58, 579–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, C. R., & Ferguson, G. M. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media & maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Sex Roles,67, 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. R. (1999). Teenage sexuality and media practice: Factoring in the influences of family, friends, and school. Journal of Sex Research,36, 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulhofer, A., Busko, V., & Landripet, I. (2010). Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 168–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Bridges, A., Johnson, J. A., & Ezzell, M. B. (2016). Pornography and the male sexual script: An analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 983–994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication,62, 869–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbosch, L., & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2017). The relationship between online pornography and the sexual objectification of women: The attenuating role of porn literacy education. Journal of Communication,67, 1015–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voon, V., Mole, T. B., Banca, P., Porter, L., Morris, L., Mitchell, S., et al. (2014). Neural correlates of sexual cue reactivity in individuals with and without compulsive sexual behaviours. PLoS ONE,9, e102419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (2016). Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015. Journal of Sex Research,53, 560–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., Kleiner, S., & Irizarry, Y. (2010). Pornography, normalization, and empowerment. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 1389–1401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior,6, 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., & Busby, D. M. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Exploring variations in the perception of pornography. Journal of Sex Research,53, 678–688.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., Carroll, J. S., Busby, D. M., & Brown, C. (2016). Differences in pornography use among romantic couples: Associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Archives of Sexual Behavior,45, 145–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. (2016). VR porn is here and it’s scary how realistic it is. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2016/01/08/naughty-america-vr-porn-experience/#DlUoRXQHbmqt. Accessed 30 March 2018.

  • Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior assessing the claim for causality. Annals of the International Communication Association,35, 353–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Sun, C., Steffen, N. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2017a). Associative pathways between pornography consumption and reduced sexual satisfaction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1323076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., Kraus, A., & Klann, E. (2017b). Pornography consumption and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research,43, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzman, S. T., & Butler, M. H. (2009). Wives’ experience of husbands’ pornography use and concomitant deception as an attachment threat in the adult pair-bond relationship. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity,16, 210–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles,64, 449–462.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan D. Leonhardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonhardt, N.D., Spencer, T.J., Butler, M.H. et al. An Organizational Framework for Sexual Media’s Influence on Short-Term Versus Long-Term Sexual Quality. Arch Sex Behav 48, 2233–2249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1209-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1209-4

Keywords

Navigation