Public Perception of Female Fertility: Initial Fertility, Peak Fertility, and Age-Related Infertility Among U.S. Adults

  • Robin E. Jensen
  • Nicole Martins
  • Melissa M. Parks
Original Paper

Abstract

Perceptions of fertility are thought to impact reproductive behaviors, yet little is known about how lay people conceptualize the female fertility timeline. In this research, public perception of the female fertility timeline was assessed via a national survey of U.S. adults (N = 990) ranging in age from 18 to 89 years. Although there is no scientific consensus on the makeup of the female fertility timeline, results from this research indicate that the U.S. public posits fertility onset at (approximately) 13 years, peak fertility at 22, ideal first pregnancy age at 23, too late for pregnancy at 46, and infertility at 49. Regression analysis revealed that perceived peak fertility and ideal pregnancy age were positively correlated such that participants perceived the ideal pregnancy age as directly following peak fertility. Education was significantly related to fertility perceptions; those with more education perceived initial fertility to be lower and peak fertility and ideal pregnancy age to be higher. In other words, more highly educated individuals perceived fertility to manifest over a longer period of time as compared to individuals with less education. Black and Hispanic participants and participants with lower income perceived ideal first pregnancy age as significantly lower than did White participants and participants with higher income. These differences may suggest that the seeds of health disparities associated with phenomena such as adolescent pregnancy are lurking in fertility timeline perceptions.

Keywords

Illness representation Pregnancy Reproductive health Science perceptions Self-regulation theory 

Supplementary material

10508_2018_1197_MOESM1_ESM.doc (83 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 83 kb)

References

  1. Benyamini, Y., Gozlan, M., & Kokia, E. (2004). On the self-regulation of a health threat: Cognitions, coping, and emotions among women undergoing treatment for infertility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 577–592.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000045566.97966.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bretherick, K. L., Fairbrother, N., Avila, L., Harbord, S. H. A., & Robinson, W. P. (2010). Fertility and aging: Do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertility and Sterility, 93, 2162–2168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunting, L., Tsibulsky, I., & Boivin, J. (2013). Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study. Human Reproduction, 28, 385–397.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bute, J. J., & Russell, L. D. (2012). Public discourses about teenage pregnancy: Disruption, restoration, and ideology. Health Communication, 72, 712–722.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.636479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, A. C. (2002). Welfare, premarital childbearing, and the role of normative climate: 1968–1994. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 295–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00295.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chipman, A., & Morrison, E. (2015). Family planning: Fertility and parenting ideals in urban adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 695–703.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0254-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010). The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, S67–S79.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniluk, J. C., Koert, E., & Cheung, A. (2012). Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: Identifying the gaps. Fertility and Sterility, 97, 420–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dick, M.-L. B., Bain, C. J., Purdie, D. M., Siskind, V., Molloy, D., & Green, A. C. (2003). Self-reported difficulty in conceiving as a measure of fertility. Human Reproduction, 18, 2711–2717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunson, D. B., Colombo, B., & Baird, D. D. (2002). Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Human Reproduction, 17, 1399–1403.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farquhar, D. (2014). The other machine: Discourse and reproductive technologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frisch, R. E. (1980). Fatness, puberty, and fertility: Stored fat appears to regulate reproductive ability in the human female. Natural History, 89, 16–27.Google Scholar
  15. Frisch, R. E. (2002). Female fertility and the body fat connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fulford, B., Bunting, L., Tsibulsky, I., & Boivin, J. (2013). The role of knowledge and perceived susceptibility in intentions to optimize fertility: Findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study. Human Reproduction, 28, 3253–3263.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ginsburg, F. D., & Rapp, R. (Eds.). (1995). Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greil, A. L., McQuillan, J., & Slauson-Blevins, K. (2011). The social construction of infertility. Sociology Compass, 5, 736–746.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00397.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greil, A. L., Slauson-Blevins, K. S., Shreffler, K. M., Johnson, K. M., Lowry, M. D., & Burch, A. R. (2016). Decline in ethical concerns about reproductive technologies among a representative sample of U.S. women. Public Understanding of Science, 26, 789–805.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515625402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammond, K. R., Rocconi, R. P., & Steinkampf, M. P. (2002). Perceptions of age and fertility: A survey of reproductive health care providers. Fertility and Sterility, 78, S72–S73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03571-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hampson, S. E., Glasgow, R. E., & Toobert, D. J. (1990). Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities. Health Psychology, 9, 632–646.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.9.5.632.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harter, L. M., Kirby, E. L., Edwards, A., & McClanahan, A. (2005). Time, technology, and meritocracy: The disciplining of women’s bodies in narrative constructions of age-related infertility. In L. M. Harter, P. M. Japp, & C. S. Beck (Eds.), Narratives, health and healing: Communication theory, research, and practice (pp. 83–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Heijmans, M., & de Ridder, D. (1998). Assessing illness representations of chronic illness: Explorations of their disease-specific nature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 485–503.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018788427100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Irvine, J. M. (2004). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jeha, D., Usta, I., Ghulmiyyah, L., & Nassar, A. (2015). A review of the risks and consequences of adolescent pregnancy. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, 8, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.3233/NPM-15814038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen, R. E. (2016). Infertility: Tracing the history of a transformative term. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jensen, R. E., & Blumling, A. N. (2018). Justifying an ideal first pregnancy age: Vernacular science knowledge and the facilitation of lay argument. Public Understanding of Science, 27, 325–337.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517727673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen, R. E., & Bute, J. J. (2010). Fertility-related perceptions and behaviors among low-income women: Injunctive norms, sanctions, and the assumption of choice. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1573–1584.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310375619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kane, J. B., Morgan, S. P., Harris, K. M., & Guilkey, D. K. (2013). The educational consequences of teen childbearing. Demography, 50, 2129–2150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0238-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lampic, C., Svanberg, A. S., Karlström, P., & Tydén, T. (2006). Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Human Reproduction, 21, 558–564.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen, U., & Vaupel, J. W. (1993). Hutterite fecundability by age and parity: Strategies for frailty modeling of even histories. Demography, 30, 81–102.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2061864.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavin, C., & Cox, J. E. (2012). Teen pregnancy prevention: Current perspectives. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 24, 462–469.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283555bee.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992). Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 143–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common sense model of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Medical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7–30). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  35. Leventhal, H., Nerenz, D., & Steele, D. (1984). Illness representations and coping with health threats. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health: Social psychological aspects of health (Vol. 4, pp. 219–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Lundsberg, L. S., Pal, L., Gariepy, A. M., Xu, X., Chu, M. C., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: A population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 767–774.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martins, N., & Jensen, R. E. (2014). The relationship between ‘Teen Mom’ reality programming and teenagers’ beliefs about teen parenthood. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 830–852.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.851701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Menken, J., Trussell, J., & Larsen, U. (1986). Age and infertility. Science, 233, 1389–1394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Munshi, K., & Myaux, J. (2006). Social norms and the fertility transition. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Orbell, S., O’Sullivan, I., Parker, R., Steele, B., Campbell, C., & Weller, D. (2008). Illness representations and coping following an abnormal colorectal cancer screening result. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1465–1474.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Peterson, B. D., Pirritano, M., Tucker, L., & Lampic, C. (2012). Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Human Reproduction, 27, 1375–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rexhaj, S., Python, N. V., Morin, D., Bonsack, C., & Favrod, J. (2013). Correlational study: Illness representations and coping styles in caregivers for individuals with schizophrenia. Annals of General Psychiatry.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-12-27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan, G. L., Maassen, R. A., Dokras, A., Syrop, C. H., & van Voorhis, B. J. (2005). A majority of women delay childbearing in both fertile and infertile groups despite understanding the risks of aging on fertility. Fertility and Sterility, 84, S73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandelowski, M., & de Lacey, S. (2002). The uses of a “disease”: Infertility as rhetorical vehicle. In M. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 33–51). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Strassmann, B. I., & Warner, J. (1998). Predictors of fecund ability and conception waits among the Dogon of Mali. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199802)105:2%3C167::AID-AJPA5%3E3.0.CO;2-S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Swift, B. E., & Liu, K. E. (2014). The effect of age, ethnicity, and level of education on fertility awareness and duration of infertility. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 36, 990–996.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30412-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tough, S., Benzies, K., Newburn-Cook, C., Tofflemire, K., Fraser-Lee, N., Faber, A., & Sauve, R. (2006). What do women know about the risks of delayed childbearing? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97, 330–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Virtala, A., Vilska, S., Huttunen, T., & Kunttu, K. (2011). Childbearing, the desire to have children, and awareness about the impact of age on female fertility among Finnish university students. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 16, 108–115.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2011.553295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin E. Jensen
    • 1
  • Nicole Martins
    • 2
  • Melissa M. Parks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.The Media SchoolIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations