Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 827–828 | Cite as

Is Male Facial Width-to-Height Ratio the Target of Sexual Selection?

  • Barnaby J. W. Dixson
Letter to the Editor

Physiognomy, the process of interpreting personality and behavioral disposition from physical features, influences diverse judgments from legal and voting decisions to choices of romantic partners (Todorov, 2017). Among the many facial metrics implicated in personality assessment, the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has received considerable attention. Men with wider faces rank higher on status seeking, social dominance, and aggressiveness (Geniole, Denson, Dixson, Carré, & McCormick, 2015). Recently, Arnocky et al. (2017) provided compelling evidence that men’s sexual openness, sexual drive, and intended sexual infidelity were also positively associated with fWHR. These results contribute to a growing body of research suggesting that women face costs when selecting masculine men as long-term partners (Dixson, Sulikowski, Gouda-Vossos, Rantala, & Brooks, 2016).

Sexual selection has been implicated in shaping the evolution of high fWHR in men through androgenic effects during...

References

  1. Arnocky, S., Carré, J. M., Bird, B. M., Moreau, B. J., Vaillancourt, T., Ortiz, T., & Marley, N. (2017). The facial width-to-height ratio predicts sex drive, sociosexuality, and intended infidelity. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1070-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird, B. M., Jofré, V. S. C., Geniole, S. N., Welker, K. M., Zilioli, S., Maestripieri, D., et al. (2016). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men’s testosterone concentrations? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 392–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blows, M. W., & Brooks, R. (2003). Measuring nonlinear selection. American Naturalist, 162, 815–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks, R. C., Shelly, J. P., Jordan, L. A., & Dixson, B. J. (2015). The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 275, 2651–2656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Claes, P., & Shriver, M. D. (2016). New entries in the lottery of facial GWAS discovery. PLoS Genetics, 12(8), e1006250.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, M., Lio, G., Gomez, A., & Sirigu, A. (2017). How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172739.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172739.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixson, B. J. W., Lee, A. J., Sherlock, J. M., & Talamas, S. N. (2017). Beneath the beard: Do facial morphometrics influence the strength of judgments of men’s beardedness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dixson, B. J. W., Sulikowski, D., Gouda-Vossos, A., Rantala, M. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2016). The masculinity paradox: Facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women’s ratings of men’s facial attractiveness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29, 2311–2320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenbruch, A. B., Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Arai, S., & Roney, J. R. (2017). Why the wide face? Androgen receptor gene polymorphism does not predict men’s facial width-to-height ratio. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0084-x.Google Scholar
  11. Geniole, S. N., Denson, T. F., Dixson, B. J., Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2015). Evidence from meta-analyses of the facial width-to-height ratio as an evolved cue of threat. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0132726.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132726.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Sobraske, H., Samore, T., Gurven, M., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2016). Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is not associated with adolescent testosterone levels. PLoS ONE, 11, e0153083.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153083.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kramer, R. S. (2017). Sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in human skulls and faces: A meta-analytical approach. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Todorov, A. (2017). Face value: The irresistible influence of first impressions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Weinberg, S. M., Parsons, T. E., Raffensperger, Z. D., & Marazita, M. L. (2015). Prenatal sex hormones, digit ratio, and face shape in adult males. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 18, 21–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitehouse, A. J., Gilani, S. Z., Shafait, F., Mian, A., Tan, D. W., Maybery, M. T., et al. (2015). Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 20151351.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandSt. Lucia, BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations