Beyond “Just Saying No”: A Preliminary Evaluation of Strategies College Students Use to Refuse Sexual Activity
Preventing sexual assault is a core goal for universities as prevalence rates of sexual assault remain high, particularly among college students. A key mechanism thought to decrease rates of sexual assault is teaching college students how to give clear, explicit, verbal refusals. However, there is a paucity of research regarding how college students refuse sex. Thus, the purpose of this study was to understand different behavioral strategies college students would use to refuse sex. A sample of 773 heterosexual college students (523 women, 250 men) were recruited from two large southern universities in the USA to complete a survey on sexual communication. Thirty-eight items assessing verbal and behavioral cues that college students would use to refuse vaginal–penile sex were written based on previous, formative research. Items were assessed by the research team through an exploratory factor analyses, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results yielded a three-factor structure: direct nonverbal refusals, direct verbal refusals, and indirect nonverbal refusals; CFA results suggested a good fit index for the model. Two independent sample t tests were conducted to examine differences in refusal cues across gender and relationship status; significant differences in refusals emerged for both. The three-factor structure depicting refusal cues was similar to previous work depicting cues college students use to communicate sexual consent; such information could inform sexual assault prevention programming.
KeywordsSexual refusals Sexual consent Gender differences College students
- Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652.
- Beres, M. A., Herold, E., & Maitland, S. B. (2004). Sexual consent behaviors in same-sex relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(5), 475–486.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. L., Young, A. M., Sales, J. M., Diclemente, R. J., Rose, E. S., & Wingood, G. M. (2014). Impact of abuse history on adolescent African American women’s current HIV/STD-associated behaviors and psychosocial mediators of HIV/STD risk. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 23, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2014.873511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Burrow, J., Hannon, R., & Hall, D. (1998). College students perceptions of women’s verbal and non-verbal consent for sexual intercourse. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 1. Retrieved from http://mail.ejhs.org/volume1/burrow/burrow.htm.
- Byers, E. S. (1980). Female communication of consent and nonconsent to sexual intercourse. Journal of New Brunswick Psychology, 5, 12–18.Google Scholar
- Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S. H., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Thomas, G., … Westat, I. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Association of American Universities Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://ias.virginia.edu/sites/ias.virginia.edu/files/University%20of%20Virginia_2015_climate_final_report.pdf.
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
- DeSantis, A. (2007). Inside Greek-U: Fraternities, sororities and the pursuit of power, pleasure, and prestige. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
- DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Foubert, J. D., Garner, D. N., & Thaxter, P. J. (2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40, 361–373.Google Scholar
- Gorsuch, R. L. (2014). Factor analysis: Classic (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1983)Google Scholar
- Green, S. B., Thompson, M. S., Levy, R., & Lo, W.-J. (2015). Type I and type II error rates and overall accuracy of the revised parallel analysis method for determining the number of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75, 428–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414546566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hall, D. S. (1998). Consent for sexual behavior in a college student population. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 1. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume1/consent1.htm.
- Humphreys, T. P., & Kennett, D. J. (2010). The reliability and validity of instruments supporting the sexual self-control model. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 19(1–2), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Jaworski, B. C., & Carey, M. P. (2001). Effects of a brief, theory-based STD-prevention program for female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(6), 417–425.Google Scholar
- Jozkowski, K. N. (2016). Barriers to affirmative consent polices: The need for affirmative sexuality. University of the Pacific Law Review, 47, 741–772.Google Scholar
- Jozkowski, K. N., & Humphreys, T. P. (2014). Sexual consent on college campuses: Implications for sexual assault prevention education. The Health Educator, 31(2), 31–36.Google Scholar
- Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014a). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S. A., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014b). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabacoff, R. I. (2003). Determining the dimensionality of data: A SAS macro for parallel analysis. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of SAS Users Group International (Vol. 5, No. 2004, pp. 090–28), Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Karjane, H. M., Fisher, B., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Sexual assault on campus: What colleges and universities are doing about it. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/205521.pdf.
- Kennett, D. J., Humphreys, T. P., & Bramley, J. E. (2013). Sexual resourcefulness and gender roles as moderators of relationship satisfaction and consenting to unwanted sex in undergraduate women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 22, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maisto, S. A., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., & Gordon, C. M. (2002). The effects of alcohol and expectancies on risk perception and behavioral skills relevant to safer sex among heterosexual young adult women. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(4), 476–485.Google Scholar
- Muehlenhard, C. L., Andrews, S. L., & Beal, G. K. (1996). Beyond “just saying no”: Dealing with men’s unwanted sexual advances in heterosexual dating contexts. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 141–168). New York, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Muehlenhard, C. L., Peterson, Z. D., Humphreys, T. P., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2017). Evaluating the one-in five statistic: Women’s risk of sexual assault while in college. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1295014.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2016). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables (User’s guide) (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- New, J. (2014, October 17). More college campuses swap ‘no means no’ for ‘yes means yes.’ The Rundown: PBS Newshour. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/means-enough-college-campuses/.
- Ross, L. T., Kolars, C. L. K., Krahn, D. D., Gomberg, E. S. L., Clark, G., & Niehaus, A. (2011). Nonconsensual sexual experiences and alcohol consumption among women entering college. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 399–413.Google Scholar
- Rostad, W. L., Silverman, P., & Mcdonald, M. K. (2014). Daddy’s little girl goes to college: An investigation of females’ perceived closeness with fathers and later risky behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 62, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2014.887570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schewe, P. A. (2006). Interventions to prevent sexual violence. In P. A. Schewe (Ed.), Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 223–239). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. (2014, June 13). A campus dilemma: Sure ‘no’ means ‘no’ but exactly what means ‘yes’? NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/06/13/321677110/a-campus-dilemma-sure-no-means-no-but-exactly-what-means-yes.
- St. Lawrence, J. S., Brasfield, T. L., Jefferson, K. W., Alleyne, E., O’Bannon, R. E., & Shirely, A. (1995). Cognitive-behavioral intervention to reduce African American adolescents’ risk for HIV infection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 221–237.Google Scholar
- Weinhardt, L. S., Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B., & Verdecias, R. N. (1998). Increasing assertiveness skills to reduce HIV risk among women living with a severe and persistent mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 680–684.Google Scholar
- White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. (2014). Not alone: The first report of the white house task force to protect students from sexual assault. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/report_0.pdf.