Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 737–745 | Cite as

Is Viewing Sexually Explicit Material Cheating on Your Partner? A Comparison Between the United States and Spain

  • Charles NegyEmail author
  • Diego Plaza
  • Abilio Reig-Ferrer
  • Maria Dolores Fernandez-Pascual
Original Paper

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined whether university students from the U.S. (n = 392) and Spain (n = 200) considered the viewing of sexually explicit material (SEM) to be tantamount to committing infidelity. Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 36 (U.S. sample) and 18 to 35 (Spain sample), respectively. At both universities, the study was made available to students via a computer program that allows recruitment and completion of the questionnaires online. It was found that the majority of U.S. and Spanish participants (73 and 77%, respectively) indicated that they did not consider viewing SEM as an act of infidelity. Also, overall, U.S. participants, those who were not currently in a relationship, and those who do not view SEM, were significantly more likely to believe that viewing SEM constituted infidelity compared to Spanish participants, those currently in a relationship, and those who view SEM. Finally, it was found that among U.S. and Spanish participants, intolerance of infidelity in general, negative attitudes toward SEM, and the proclivity for jealousy significantly correlated with believing that viewing SEM was tantamount to infidelity. For U.S. participants only, religiosity and (low) self-esteem also correlated with the belief that viewing SEM was infidelity. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Infidelity Sexually explicit material Pornography Jealousy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board at both universities where this study took place prior to data collection. Moreover, all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of our respective institutions and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained, voluntarily, from each study participant.

References

  1. Albright, J. M. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 175–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D. (1976). Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baucom, D. H., Snyder, D. K., & Gordon, K. C. (2009). Helping couples get past the affair: A clinician’s guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brase, G. L., Adair, L., & Monk, K. (2014). Explaining sex differences in reaction to relationship infidelities: Comparison of the roles of sex, gender, beliefs, attachment, and sociosexual orientation. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 73–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partners use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29, 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brislin, R. W. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2014). Clinical implications of internet infidelity: Where Facebook fits in. American Journal of Family Therapy, 42, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisinga, R., te Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans-DeCicco, J. A., & Cowan, G. (2001). Attitudes toward pornography and the characteristics attributed to pornography actors. Sex Roles, 44, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffith, S. A., Negy, C., & Chadee, D. (2006). Trinidadian and United States citizens’ attitudes toward domestic violence and their willingness to intervene: Does culture make a difference? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 761–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunderson, J. G., Triebwasser, J., Phillips, K. A., & Sullivan, C. N. (1999). Personality and vulnerability to affective disorders. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 3–32). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hupka, R. B., Buunk, B.,Gabor, F., Fulgosi, A., & Swain, R. (1983). The structure of romantic jealousy in five nations. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Ingram, B. L. (2009). The case of Ms. Q: A demonstration of the integrative psychotherapy guided by ‘core clinical hypotheses’. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5, 1–42.Google Scholar
  18. Kohut, T., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2017). Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: Initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 585–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert, N. M., Negash, S., Stillman, T. F., Olmstead, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 410–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lansky, M. (1982). Mask of the narcissistically vulnerable marriage. International Journal of Family Psychiatry, 3, 439–449.Google Scholar
  21. Linquist, L., & Negy, C. (2005). Maximizing the experiences of an extrarelational affair: An unconventional approach to a common social convention. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1421–1428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luerssen, A., Jhita, G. J., & Ayduk, O. (2017). Putting yourself on the line: Self-esteem and expressing affection in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 940–956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Maher, B. A., & Maher, W. B. (1994). Personality and psychopathology: A historical perspective. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 72–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Merriam-Webster (2017). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved September 7, 2017, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infidelity.
  25. Mruk, C. J. (2013). Self-esteem, relationships, and positive psychology: Concepts, research, and connections. In M. Hojjat (Ed.), Positive psychology of love. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Negy, C., Velezmoro, R., Reig-Ferrer, A., Smith-Castro, V., & Livia, J. (2016). Parental influence on their adult children’s sexual values: A multi-national comparison between the United States, Spain, Costa Rica, and Peru. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 477–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the internet tells us about sex and relationships. New York, NY: Penguin books.Google Scholar
  28. Omar, L., Mosek, A., & Yagil, Y. (2014). Romantic jealousy from the perspective of Bowen’s concept of differentiation and gender differences. The Family Journal, 22, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker, T. S., & Wampler, K. S. (2003). How bad is it? Perceptions of the relationship impact of different types of internet sexual activities. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25, 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson, A. (2013). 25 percent of men watch online porn, and other ‘facts’ about Americans’ online video habits. Retrieved on December 25, 2016 at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/10/10/25-percent-of-men-watch-online-porn-and-other-facts-about-americans-online-video-habits/.
  31. Pew Research Center (2011). The American-Western European values gap. Retrieved on December 28, 2016 at http://www.pewglobal.org/2011/11/17/the-american-western-european-values-gap/.
  32. Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 72–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rasmussen, K. (2016). A historical and empirical review of pornography and romantic relationships: Implications for family researchers. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short form of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rissel, C., Richters, J., de Visser, R. O., McKee, A., Yeung, A., & Caruana, T. (2017). A profile of pornography users in Australia: Findings from the second Australian study of health and relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 227–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, R. (2004). Predicting romantic jealousy from personality variables, ethnicity, and gender. Undergraduate honor’s thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. SONA (2016). Sona Systems, Ltd. Retrieved October 12, 2017 from http://www.sona-systems.com/about.aspx.
  39. Stack, S., Wasserman, I., & Kern, R. (2004). Adult social bonds and use of internet pornography. Social Scientific Quarterly, 85, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Traeen, B., Nilsen, T. S., & Stigum, H. (2006). Use of pornography in traditional media and on the internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 245–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Velezmoro, R., Negy, C., & Livia, J. (2012). On-line sexual activity: Cross-national comparison between United States and Peruvian college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1015–1025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yucel, D., & Gassanov, M. A. (2010). Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Social Science Research, 39, 725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zandbergen, D. L., & Brown, S. G. (2015). Culture and gender differences in romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). The methods and merits of pornography research. Journal of Communication, 38, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zitzman, S. T., & Butler, M. H. (2009). Wives’ experience of husbands’ pornography use and concomitant deception as an attachment threat in the adult pair-bond relationship. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 16, 210–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Dpto. de Psicología de la Salud, Facultad de Ciencias de la SaludUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations