Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 671–679 | Cite as

A Longitudinal Assessment of Associations Between Women’s Tendency to Pretend Orgasm, Orgasm Function, and Intercourse-Related Pain in Different Partner Relationship Constellations

  • Patrick Jern
  • Outi Hakala
  • Antti Kärnä
  • Annika GunstEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate how women’s tendency to pretend orgasm during intercourse is associated with orgasm function and intercourse-related pain, using a longitudinal design where temporal stability and possible causal relationships could be modeled. The study sample consisted of 1421 Finnish women who had participated in large-scale population-based data collections conducted at two time points 7 years apart. Pretending orgasm was assessed for the past 4 weeks, and orgasm function and pain were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index for the past 4 weeks. Associations were also computed separately in three groups of women based on relationship status. Pretending orgasm was considerably variable over time, with 34% of the women having pretended orgasm a few times or more at least at one time point, and 11% having done so at both time points. Initial bivariate correlations revealed associations between pretending orgasm and orgasm problems within and across time, whereas associations with pain were more ambiguous. However, we found no support in the path model for the leading hypotheses that pretending orgasms would predict pain or orgasm problems over a long period of time, or that pain or orgasm problems would predict pretending orgasm. The strongest predictor of future pretending in our model was previous pretending (R 2 = .14). Relationship status did not seem to affect pretending orgasm in any major way.

Keywords

Pretending orgasm Female sexual function Intercourse-related pain Orgasm problems 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Patrick Jern is funded by Suomen Akatemia (FI) (Grant Nos. 138291 and 274521).

Supplementary material

10508_2017_1117_MOESM1_ESM.txt (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TXT 13 kb)
10508_2017_1117_MOESM2_ESM.txt (33 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (TXT 32 kb)
10508_2017_1117_MOESM3_ESM.docx (87 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 86 kb)

References

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryan, T. S. (2001). Pretending to experience orgasm as a communicative act: How, when and why some sexually experienced college women pretend to experience orgasm during various sexual behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, E. B., Fenigstein, A., & Fauber, R. L. (2014). The Faking Orgasm Scale for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 423–435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darling, C. A., & Davidson, J. K. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 12, 182–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunne, M. P., Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., & Martin, N. G. (2000). The subtlety of sex-atypicality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 549–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellsworth, R. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Human female orgasm as evolved signal: A test of two hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1545–1554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahs, B. (2014). Coming to power: Women’s fake orgasm and best orgasm experiences illuminate the failures of (hetero)sex and the pleasures of connection. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16, 974–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman, D. L., Gillath, O., & Haj-Mohamadi, P. (2017). Development and validation of the Pretending Orgasm Reasons Measure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1973–1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gunst, A., Ventus, D., Kärnä, A., Salo, P., & Jern, P. (2017). Female sexual function varies over time and is dependent on partner-specific factors: A population-based longitudinal analysis of six sexual function domains. Psychological Medicine, 47, 341–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hevesi, K., Mészáros, V., Kövi, Z., Márki, G., & Szabó, M. (2017). Different characteristics of the Female Sexual Function Index in a sample of sexually active and inactive women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14, 1133–1141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report: A nationwide study on female sexuality. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Jern, P., Gunst, A., Sandqvist, F., Sandnabba, N. K., & Santtila, P. (2011). Using ecological momentary assessment to investigate associations between ejaculatory latency and control in partner and non-partner sexual activities. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 316–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansson, A., Jern, P., Santtila, P., von der Pahlen, B., Eriksson, E., Westberg, L., … Sandnabba, N. K. (2013). The Genetics of Sexuality and Aggression (GSA) twin samples in Finland. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 150–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1121–1125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kingsberg, S. A., Tkachenko, N., Lucas, J., Burbrink, A., Kreppner, W., & Dickstein, J. B. (2013). Characterization of orgasmic difficulties by women: Focus group evaluation. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 2242–2250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kontula, O., & Haavio-Mannila, E. (2002). Masturbation in a generational perspective. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 14, 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Långström, N., & Zucker, K. J. (2005). Transvestic fetishism in the general population: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 87–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Dolezal, C. (2007). The Female Sexual Function Index: A methodological critique and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 217–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 552–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2012). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analyses with latent variable (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  21. Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). ‘‘It feels so good it almost hurts’’: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 503–515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts, C., Kippax, S., Waldby, C., & Crawford, J. (1995). Faking it: The story of ‘Ohh!’ Women’s Studies International Forum, 18, 523–532.Google Scholar
  23. Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stieger, S., Reips, U.-D., & Voracek, M. (2007). Forced-response in online surveys: bias from reactance and an increase in sex-specific dropout. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1653–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 131–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Witting, K., Santtila, P., Jern, P., Varjonen, M., Wager, I., Höglund, M., … Sandnabba, N. K. (2008). Evaluation of the Female Sexual Function Index in a population based sample from Finland. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 912–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu, C., Shih-Tsung, H., Hsin-Chien, H., Yu-Chao, H., Po-Chih, C., & Ming-Li, H. (2010). A survey of women fake orgasm and its correlation with unpleasant sexual experiences: MP28–37. International Journal of Urology, 17, A197. https://insights.ovid.com/international-urology/ijurl/2010/08/001/survey-women-fake-orgasm-its-correlation/286/00043855.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Jern
    • 1
    • 2
  • Outi Hakala
    • 1
  • Antti Kärnä
    • 1
  • Annika Gunst
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyÅbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations