The Psychology of Gay Men’s Cuckolding Fantasies

Original Paper

Abstract

Cuckolding (also known as troilism) is a sexual interest in which one obtains sexual arousal from the experience of a romantic partner engaging in sexual activity with someone else. The present study investigated fantasies about and experiences with cuckolding in a large and diverse sample of predominately gay-identified men (N = 580). Compared to previous research focusing on heterosexual men’s cuckolding fantasies, our results indicate that gay men’s cuckolding fantasies share many common elements; however, they differ in some important ways. Most notably, interracial and BDSM themes do not appear to be as common in gay men’s cuckolding fantasies as they are among heterosexual men. Our findings also indicate that frequent fantasies about cuckolding are linked to several overlapping sexual interests (e.g., voyeurism, group sex) and, further, the content of these fantasies is associated with a number of individual differences (e.g., agreeableness, sensation seeking, sociosexuality). Finally, this study also suggests that gay men who act on their cuckolding fantasies tend to report positive experiences; however, the likelihood of reporting positive outcomes appears to depend upon one’s personality and attachment style.

Keywords

Cuckolding Sexual fantasy Gay men Consensual non-monogamy Troilism DSM-5 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behavior, 46, 887–909. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birnbaum, G. E., Simpson, J. A., Weisberg, Y. J., Barnea, E., & Assulin-Simhon, Z. (2012). Is it my overactive imagination? The effects of contextually activated attachment insecurity on sexual fantasies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(8), 1131–1152. doi: 10.1177/0265407512452978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, R. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17(4), 235–251. doi: 10.1080/00926239108404348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuba, V. (2015). Cuckold and hotwives: A survey of sexual lifestyle and satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., Parvez, R. A., Stockwell, M. L., & Davis, J. A. (2003). The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 277–289. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00016-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gates, G. J. (2012). Same-sex couples in Census 2010: Race and ethnicity. The Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-CouplesRaceEthnicity-April-2012.pdf. Accessed March 2, 2017.
  9. Goetz, A., & Shackleford, T. (2006). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in humans. In S. Platek & T. Shackleford (Eds.), Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty (pp. 103–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Joyal, C. C. (2015). Defining “normophilic” and “paraphilic” sexual fantasies in a population-based sample: On the importance of considering subgroups. Sexual Medicine, 3(4), 321–330. doi: 10.1002/sm2.96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Joyal, C. C., Cossette, A., & Lapierre, V. (2015). What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 328–340. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12734.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalichman, S. C. (2013). Sexual sensation seeking scale. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 564–565). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  15. Krueger, R. B., & Kaplan, M. S. (2001). The paraphilic and hypersexual disorders: An overview. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 7(6), 391–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehmiller, J. J. (2015). A comparison of sexual health history and outcomes among monogamous and consensually non-monogamous sexual partners. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 2022–2028. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ley, D. (2009). Insatiable wives: Women who stray and the men who love them. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  18. Ogas, O., & Gaddam, S. (2011). A billion wicked thoughts: What the Internet tells us about sexual relationships. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reid, R. (2016). Cuckolding and cuckqueaning: The insanely popular fetishes you’ve never heard of. Metro. Retrieved from http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/21/cuckholding-and-cuckqueaning-the-insanely-popular-fetishes-youve-never-heard-of-6334850/. Accessed March 2, 2017.
  22. Richters, J., De Visser, R. O., Rissel, C. E., Grulich, A. E., & Smith, A. (2008). Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): Data from a national survey. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(7), 1660–1668. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00795.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. D. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal für Psychologie, 22(1). Retrieved from https://www.journal-fuer-psychologie.de/index.php/jfp/issue/archive.
  25. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Savage, D. (2006). Savage love: Openly skank. The Stranger. Retrieved from http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=62820. Accessed August 6, 2016.
  27. Savage, D. (2008). Savage love: Gentlemen first. The Stranger. Retrieved from http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=643679. Accessed August 6, 2016.
  28. Smith, R. S. (1976). Voyeurism: A review of literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5(6), 585–608. doi: 10.1007/BF01541221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 187–204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and CounselingBall State UniversityMuncieUSA
  2. 2.The Kinsey InstituteIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.New Mexico SolutionsAlbuquerqueUSA
  4. 4.The StrangerSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations