Skip to main content
Log in

Pornography Use and Marital Separation: Evidence from Two-Wave Panel Data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As pornography use continues to increase in the U.S., studies have sought to understand its potential influence on marital relationships. Yet, the primary focus of such studies has been pornography’s association with marital quality, not stability. Consequently, we still know relatively little about whether pornography consumption at one time predicts marital disruption later on. Drawing on data from the 2006 and 2012 waves of the nationally representative Portraits of American Life Study (N = 445), this article examined whether married Americans who viewed pornography in 2006, either at all or in greater frequencies, were more likely to experience a marital separation by 2012. Binary logistic regression analyses showed that married Americans who viewed pornography at all in 2006 were more than twice as likely as those who did not view pornography to experience a separation by 2012, even after controlling for 2006 marital happiness and sexual satisfaction as well as relevant sociodemographic correlates. The relationship between pornography use frequency and marital separation, however, was technically curvilinear. The likelihood of marital separation by 2012 increased with 2006 pornography use to a point and then declined at the highest frequencies of pornography use. Ancillary analyses, however, showed that this group of married Americans with high frequencies of 2006 pornography viewing and low likelihood of later marital separation was not statistically distinguishable from either abstainers or moderate viewers in terms of marital separation likelihood. All findings held regardless of gender. Data limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Outside of attrition, the greatest source of missing data came from the dependent variable (nearly 24% missing), while all predictor variables were missing less than 4%. Imputing on the dependent variable did not substantively change the results. However, because imputing on the dependent variable can introduce unnecessary bias (Allison, 2009), the decision was made to use listwise deletion, which also makes replication more straightforward.

  2. Using controls from the 2012 wave (results available upon request) did not substantively change any of the findings for this study.

  3. Collinearity diagnostics were run for all models and no evidence of multicollinearity was found. Variance inflation factors (VIFs), which estimate how much variance of a coefficient is inflated because of linear dependence on other predictors, were all below 2.1. This is below the most conservative standards for collinearity (VIFs of 2.50 or higher) and well below the more common standard (VIFs of 5.0 or higher) (see Allison, 2012).

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing data. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2012). When can you safely ignore multicollinearity? Statistical Horizons. Retrieved at: https://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity.

  • Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 650–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner, R. M., & Bridges, A. J. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, A. J., Bergner, R. M., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2003). Romantic partner’s use of pornography: Its significance for women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, A. J., & Morokoff, P. J. (2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships, 18, 562–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., & Kohut, T. (2017). The use and effects of pornography in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C. D., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daines, R. M., & Shumway, T. (2012). Pornography and divorce. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2112435.

  • Daneback, K., Traeen, B., & Mansson, S. (2009). Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 746–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, K., & Price, J. (2014). Pornography and marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35, 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doring, N. M. (2009). The internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1089–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, V., & Parmar, R. (2013). Dirty habits? Online pornography use, personality, obsessionality, and compulsivity. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 39, 394–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. O., & Sikkink, D. (2006–2012). Portraits of American Life Study, 20062012.

  • Emerson, M. O., Sikkink, D., & James, A. (2010). The panel study on American religion and ethnicity: Background, methods, and selected results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 162–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J., & Levchak, P. (2014). Red states, blue states, and divorce: Understanding the impact of conservative Protestantism on religion variation in divorce rates. American Journal of Sociology, 119, 1002–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Gillespie, B., Royce, T., & Lever, J. (2011). Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: A U.S. online survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 429–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. J. (2013). Early exposure to pornography: Indirect and direct effects on sexual satisfaction in adulthood (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA.

  • Lambert, N. M., Negash, S., Stillman, T. F., Olmstead, S. P., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). A love that doesn’t last: Pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 410–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, L. C., & Cohen, P. N. (2015). The widening gender gap in opposition to pornography, 1975–2012. Social Currents, 2, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, A. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: Associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 441–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families, 1999–2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 805–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. C. (2006). The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muusses, L. D., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). Internet pornography and relationship quality: A longitudinal study of within and between partner effects of adjustment, sexual satisfaction and sexually explicit internet material among newly-weds. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, N. P., & Harris, S. M. (2016). Pornography and couples: What does the research tell us? Contemporary Family Therapy, 38, 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. B., Negash, S., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Emerging adults expectations for pornography use in the context of future committed romantic relationships: A qualitative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 625–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2015). Pornography consumption as a threat to religious socialization. Sociology of Religion, 76, 436–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2016). From bad to worse? Pornography consumption, spousal religiosity, gender, and marital quality. Sociological Forum, 31, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017a). Does viewing pornography reduce marital quality over time? Evidence from longitudinal data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 549–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017b). Does viewing pornography diminish religiosity over time? Evidence from two-wave panel data. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 214–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017c). Spousal religiosity, religious bonding, and pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 561–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L. (2017d). Pornography use and religious bonding among heterosexually married Americans: A longitudinal examination. Review of Religious Research, 59, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Davis, J. T. (2017). Are pornography users more likely to experience a romantic breakup? Evidence from longitudinal data. Sexuality & Culture. doi:10.1007/s12119-017-9444-8.

  • Perry, S. L., & Hayward, G. M. (2017). Seeing is (not) believing: How viewing pornography shapes the religious lives of young Americans. Social Forces, 95, 1757–1788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. L., & Schleifer, C. (2017). Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709.

  • Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prause, N., & Pfaus, J. (2015). Viewing sexual stimuli associated with greater sexual responsiveness, not erectile dysfunction. Sexual Medicine, 3, 90–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., Patterson, R., Regnerus, M., & Walley, J. (2016). How much more XXX is Generation X consuming? Evidence of changing attitudes and behaviors related to pornography since 1973. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K. (2016). A historical and empirical review of pornography and romantic relationships: Implications for family researchers. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces, 75, 957–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., Wasserman, I., & Kern, R. (2004). Adult social bonds and use of internet pornography. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. (2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. N., & Szymanski, D. M. (2012). Young adult women’s reports of their male romantic partner’s pornography use as a correlate of their self-esteem, relationship quality, and sexual satisfaction. Sex Roles, 67, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Bridges, A., Johnason, J., & Ezzell, M. (2016). Pornography and the male sexual script: An analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 983–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., & Busby, D. M. (2016). In the eye of the beholder: Exploring variations in the perceptions of pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 678–688.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, B. J., Carroll, J. S., Busby, D. M., & Brown, C. C. (2016). Differences in pornography use among couples: Associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 145–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J. (2013). U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, and correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 60–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Bae, S., & Funk, M. (2013). United States women and pornography through four decades: Exposure, attitudes, behaviors, and individual differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1131–1144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2016). Men’s objectifying media consumption, objectification of women, and attitudes supportive of violence against women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 955–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., & Bae, S. (2014). More than a dalliance? Pornography consumption and extramarital sex attitudes among married U.S. adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3, 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. J., Tokunaga, R. S., Kraus, A., & Klann, E. (2017). Pornography consumption and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 43, 315–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yucel, D., & Gassanov, M. A. (2010). Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Social Science Research, 39, 725–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Pornography’s impact on sexual satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 438–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzman, S. T., & Butler, M. H. (2009). Wives’ experience of husbands’ pornography use and concomitant deception as an attachment threat in the adult pair-bond relationship. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 16, 210–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded directly by any grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel L. Perry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perry, S.L. Pornography Use and Marital Separation: Evidence from Two-Wave Panel Data. Arch Sex Behav 47, 1869–1880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1080-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1080-8

Keywords

Navigation