Abstract
Penile plethysmography (PPG) is a measure of sexual interests that relies heavily on the stimuli it uses to generate valid results. Ethical considerations surrounding the use of real images in PPG have further limited the content admissible for these stimuli. To palliate this limitation, the current study aimed to combine audio and visual stimuli by incorporating computer-generated characters to create new stimuli capable of accurately classifying sex offenders with child victims, while also increasing the number of valid profiles. Three modalities (audio, visual, and audiovisual) were compared using two groups (15 sex offenders with child victims and 15 non-offenders). Both the new visual and audiovisual stimuli resulted in a 13% increase in the number of valid profiles at 2.5 mm, when compared to the standard audio stimuli. Furthermore, the new audiovisual stimuli generated a 34% increase in penile responses. All three modalities were able to discriminate between the two groups by their responses to the adult and child stimuli. Lastly, sexual interest indices for all three modalities could accurately classify participants in their appropriate groups, as demonstrated by ROC curve analysis (i.e., audio AUC = .81, 95% CI [.60, 1.00]; visual AUC = .84, 95% CI [.66, 1.00], and audiovisual AUC = .83, 95% CI [.63, 1.00]). Results suggest that computer-generated characters allow accurate discrimination of sex offenders with child victims and can be added to already validated stimuli to increase the number of valid profiles. The implications of audiovisual stimuli using computer-generated characters and their possible use in PPG evaluations are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G., Barlow, D., Blanchard, E., & Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 4, 623–629. doi:10.1007/BF01544270.
Abel, G., Blanchard, E. B., & Barlow, D. H. (1981). Measurement of sexual arousal in several paraphilias: The effects of stimulus modality, instructional set and stimulus content on the objective. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19, 25–33. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(81)90109-1.
Abel, G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland, C. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(2), 81–95. doi:10.1023/a:1022063214826.
Akerman, G., & Beech, A. R. (2011). A systematic review of measures of deviant sexual interest and arousal. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 118–143. doi:10.1080/13218719.2010.547161.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2001). Practice standards and guidelines for the members of the association for the treatment of sexual abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1988). Deviant sexual arousal, offense history, and demographic variables as predictors of reoffense among child molesters. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 6, 267–280. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370060209.
Barker, J. G., & Howell, R. J. (1992). The plethysmograph: A review of recent literature. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 20(1), 13–25.
Barsetti, I., Earls, C. M., Lalumière, M. L., & Bélanger, N. (1998). The differentiation of intrafamilial and extrafamilial heterosexual child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 275–286. doi:10.1177/088626098013002007.
Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in non-admitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13(1), 118–126. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.118.
Blanchard, R., Kolla, N., Cantor, J., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M., & Blak, T. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 285–309. doi:10.1007/s11194-007-9049-0.
Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., & Dickey, R. (2009a). Absolute versus relative ascertainment of pedophilia in men. Sexual Abuse A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 431–441. doi:10.1177/1079063209347906.
Blanchard, R., Kuban, M., Blak, T., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., & Cantor, J. (2012). Sexual attraction to others: A comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 13–29. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9675-3.
Blanchard, R., Lykins, A., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M., Cantor, J., Blak, T., & Klassen, P. (2009b). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9.
Chaplin, T. C., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Salient victim suffering and the sexual responses of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 249–255. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.249.
Chartier, S., Renaud, P., Bouchard, S., Proulx, J., Rouleau, J. L., Fedoroff, P., & Bradford, J. P. (2006). Sexual preference classification from gaze behavior data using a multilayer perceptron. Annual Review of Cyber Therapy and Telemedecine, 4, 149–157.
Clift, R. J. W., Rajlic, G., & Gretton, H. M. (2009). Discriminative and predictive validity of the penile plethysmograph in adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 335–362. doi:10.1177/1079063209338491.
Dennis, E., Rouleau, J.-L., Renaud, P., Nolet, K., & Saumur, C. (2014). A pilot development of virtual stimuli depicting affective dispositions for penile plethysmography assessment of sex offenders. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23, 200–208. doi:10.3138/cjhs.2529.
Dombert, B., Mokros, A., Brückner, E., Schlegl, V., Antfolk, J., Bäckström, A., & Santtila, P. (2013). The virtual people set: Developing computer-generated stimuli for the assessment of pedophilic sexual interest. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 557–582. doi:10.1177/1079063212469062.
Earls, C. M. (1983). Some issues in the assessment of sexual deviance. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 6, 431–441. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(83)90030-4.
Earls, C. M., Quinsey, V. L., & Castonguay, L. G. (1987). A comparison of three methods of scoring penile circumference changes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 493–500. doi:10.1007/BF01541713.
Farrall, W. R., & Card, R. D. (1988). Advancements in physiological evaluation of assessment and treatment of the sexual aggressor. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 261–273. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb50869.x.
Fernandez, Y. (2002). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders against female victims: Limits to its value. In Forum on corrections research (Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 7–12). Correctional Services of Canada.
Freund, K. (1963). A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- or hetero- erotic interest in the male. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 85–93. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(63)90012-3.
Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100–105. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.100.
Freund, K., Watson, R., Dickey, R., & Rienzo, D. (1991). Erotic gender differentiation in pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 555–566. doi:10.1007/BF01550954.
Gaither, G. A., & Plaud, J. J. (1997). The effects of secondary stimulus characteristics on men’s sexual arousal. The Journal of Sex Research, 34, 231–236. doi:10.1080/00224499709551890.
Goyette, M. (2012). Évaluation des intérêts sexuels auprès d’agresseurs sexuels d’enfants par la vidéooculographie et la présentation de stimuli générés par ordinateur (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1866/8714
Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R., & Oliver, L. L. (1995). Sexual arousal and arousability to pedophilic stimuli in a community sample of normal men. Behavior Therapy, 26, 681–694. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80039-5.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36. doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839–843. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708.
Harris, G., Lalumière, M. L., Seto, M., Rice, M., & Chaplin, T. (2012). Explaining the erectile responses of rapists to rape stories: The contributions of sexual activity, non-consent, and violence with injury. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 221–229. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9940-8.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502–511. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.502.
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2004). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley.
Jamison, P. L., & Gebhard, P. H. (1988). Penis size increase between flaccid and erect states: an analysis of the Kinsey data. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 177–183. doi:10.1080/00224498809551408.
Julien, E., & Over, R. (1988). Male sexual arousal across five modes of erotic stimulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17(2), 131–143. doi:10.1007/BF01542663.
Kalmus, E., & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(2), 193–217. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002.
Kuban, M., Barbaree, H. E., & Blanchard, R. (1999). A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: Response magnitude and method agreement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(4), 345–359. doi:10.1023/a:1018700813140.
Lalumière, M. L., & Harris, G. T. (1998). Common questions regarding the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 227–237. doi:10.1177/107906329801000306.
Launay, G. (1999). The phallometric assessment of sex offenders: An update. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9, 254–274. doi:10.1002/cbm.317.
Laws, D. R. (1984). The assessment of dangerous sexual behavior in males. Medicine and Law, 3, 127–140.
Laws, D. R., Hanson, R. K., Osborn, C. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2000). Classification of child molesters by plethysmographic assessment of sexual arousal and a self-report measure of sexual preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1297–1312. doi:10.1177/088626000015012004.
Malcolm, P. B., Andrews, D. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Discriminant and predictive validity of phallometrically measured sexual age and gender preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 486–501. doi:10.1177/088626093008004004.
Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Christophe, D. (1986). Sexual offenders against female children: Sexual preferences for age of victims and type of behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 18, 424–439. doi:10.1037/h0079966.
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2000). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Limits to its value. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 807–822. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00013-6.
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2003). Sexual preferences: Are they useful in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 131–143. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00056-8.
McAnulty, R., & Adams, H. (1990). Patterns of sexual arousal of accused child molesters involved in custody disputes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 541–556. doi:10.1007/bf01542464.
Murphy, W., Haynes, M., Stalgaitis, S., & Flanagan, B. (1986). Differential sexual responding among four groups of sexual offenders against children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 8, 339–353. doi:10.1007/BF00960731.
Perkins, N. J., & Schisterman, E. F. (2006). The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 670–675. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj063.
Proulx, J. (1989). Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 12, 275–280. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(89)90019-8.
Proulx, J., Pellerin, B., Paradis, Y., McKibben, A., Aubut, J., & Ouimet, M. (1997). Static and dynamic predictors of recidivism in sexual aggressors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 7–27. doi:10.1007/BF02674889.
Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1988). Penile responses of child molesters and normals to descriptions of encounters with children involving sex and violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 259–274. doi:10.1177/088626088003003001.
Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(1), 85–105. doi:10.1177/088626095010001006.
Renaud, P., Chartier, S., Rouleau, J.-L., Proulx, J., Décarie, J., Trottier, D., & Bouchard, S. (2009). Gaze behavior nonlinear dynamics assessed in virtual immersion as a diagnostic index of sexual deviancy: Preliminary results. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 6(3). doi:10.20385/1860-2037/6.2009.3.
Renaud, P., Rouleau, J.-L., Proulx, J., Trottier, D., Goyette, M., Bradford, J. P., & Bouchard, S. (2010). Virtual characters designed for forensic assessment and rehabilitation of sex offenders: standardized and made-to-measure. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 7. doi:10.20385/1860-2037/7.2010.5.
Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Harris, G. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381–386. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.381.
Rosen, R. C., & Keefe, F. J. (1978). The measurement of human penile tumescence. Psychophysiology, 15, 366–376. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01393.x.
Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2, 419–436. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02.
Seto, M. C. (2007). Psychophysiological assessment of paraphilic sexual interests. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 475–491). Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press.
Seto, M. C., & Lalumière, M. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15–25. doi:10.1023/A:1009510328588.
Stinson, J. D., Becker, J. V., & Sales, B. D. (2008). Self-regulation and the etiology of sexual deviance: Evaluating causal theory. Violence and Victims, 23, 35–51. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.35.
Tanner, J. M., & Whitehouse, R. H. (1976). Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 51, 170–179. doi:10.1136/adc.51.3.170.
Thornton, D., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2009). Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders. Chichester: Wiley.
Trottier, D. (2013). Les apports de la réalité virtuelle et de la vidéo-oculographie à l’évaluation des intérêts sexuels (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1866/9191
Trottier, D., Renaud, P., Rouleau, J.-L., Goyette, M., Saumur, C., Boukhalfi, T., & Bouchard, S. (2015). Erratum to: Using immersive virtual reality and anatomically correct computer-generated characters in the forensic assessment of deviant sexual preferences. Virtual Reality, 19, 303. doi:10.1007/s10055-015-0277-1.
Trottier, D., Rouleau, J.-L., Renaud, P., & Goyette, M. (2014). Using eye tracking to identify faking attempts during penile plethysmography assessment. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 946–955. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.832133.
Zappalà, A., Antfolk, J., Bäckström, A., Dombert, B., Mokros, A., & Santtila, P. (2013). Differentiating sexual preference in men: Using dual task rapid serial visual presentation task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 320–327. doi:10.1111/sjop.12050.
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329. doi:10.1037/h0030923.
Acknowledgments
We wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Fonds de Recherche Société et Culture (Research Grant awarded to the first author).
Funding
This study was funded by the Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant number: 820-2010-0024) and the Fonds Québécois de Recherche en Science Humaine. (Grant Number 2014-SE-171329). Author A also received a student research grant from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture (Grant Number 31071) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant Number 754-2015-1463).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors A and B declare that they have no conflict of interest. Author C received a research grant from the Bell Telephone Company (no grant number) as well as the Ministère de l’Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations (no grant number). Author C partly owns the company BehaVRsolutions, which did not provide financial support for this study, but did provide the technologies necessary to create the visual stimuli used in the study.
Research involving Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marschall-Lévesque, S., Rouleau, JL. & Renaud, P. Increasing Valid Profiles in Phallometric Assessment of Sex Offenders with Child Victims: Combining the Strengths of Audio Stimuli and Synthetic Characters. Arch Sex Behav 47, 417–428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1053-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1053-y