Abstract
Recent research has established marked punitive attitudes against people sexually interested in children. These negative attitudes are even more pronounced when such sexual interest is labeled as pedophilia, but are attenuated to the extent that such sexual interest is perceived as beyond one’s own control (unintentional). We explored these effects in more detail by separately manipulating the label (pedophiles vs. people with sexual interest in prepubescent children) and degree of intentionality (pedophilia or sexual desire as malleable vs. not malleable). Participants recruited via an online platform (N = 423) were randomly assigned to the experimental conditions and asked to rate degree of intentionality, dangerousness, deviance, and punitive attitudes toward people sexually interested in children. As expected, participants expressed stronger punitive attitudes when the label was present. The manipulation of intentionality, however, was not successful. Further analyses explored whether participants found the notion that sexual interest cannot be altered at will more credible than the opposite, particularly in presence of the pedophilia label. The results are discussed with regard to the significance of and potential intervention against the markedly strong public stigma against people with pedophilia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.
Angermeyer, M. C., & Matschinger, H. (2003). The stigma of mental illness: Effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(4), 304–309. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00150.x.
Beech, A. R., Miner, M. H., & Thornton, D. (2016). Paraphilias in the DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 383–406. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093330.
Berlin, F. S. (2014). Pedophilia and DSM-5: The importance of clearly defining the nature of a pedophilic disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 42(4), 404–407.
Bos, A. E. R., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in theory and research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.746147.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.
Cantor, J. M., & McPhail, I. V. (2016). Non-offending pedophiles. Current Sexual Health Reports. doi:10.1007/s11930-016-0076-z.
Corrigan, P. W. (2007). How clinical ciagnosis might exacerbate the stigma of mental illness. Social Work, 52(1), 31–39. doi:10.1093/sw/52.1.31.
Corrigan, P. W., Bink, A. B., Fokuo, J. K., & Schmidt, A. (2015). The public stigma of mental illness means a difference between you and me. Psychiatry Research, 226(1), 186–191. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.047.
Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(2), 162–179. doi:10.2307/1519806.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358.
Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 214–223. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108.
Feldman, D. B., & Crandall, C. S. (2007). Dimensions of mental illness stigma: What about mental illness causes social rejection? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 137–154. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.2.137.
Greenwald, A. (2014). Why are attitudes important? In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Grundmann, D., Krupp, J., Scherner, G., Amelung, T., & Beier, K. M. (2016). Stability of self-reported arousal to sexual fantasies involving children in a clinical sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1153–1162. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0729-z.
Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2016). Implicit theories and offender representativeness in judgments about sexual crime. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. doi:10.1177/1079063216658019.
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), 813–821. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069.
Imhoff, R. (2015a). Punitive attitudes against pedophiles or persons with sexual interest in children: Does the label matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 35–44. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0439-3.
Imhoff, R. (2015b). Zeroing in on the effect of the schizophrenia label on stigmatizing attitudes: A large-scale study. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(2), 456–463. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv137.
Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(3), 169–184. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.795921.
Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer, J. (2015a). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 21–34. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4.
Jahnke, S., Philipp, K., & Hoyer, J. (2015b). Stigmatizing attitudes towards people with pedophilia and their malleability among psychotherapists in training. Child Abuse and Neglect, 40, 93–102. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.07.008.
Jahnke, S., Schmidt, A. F., Geradt, M., & Hoyer, J. (2015c). Stigma-related stress and its correlates among men with pedophilic sexual interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2173–2187. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0503-7.
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105.
Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Frank, J., & Wozniak, J. F. (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: Understanding why labels matter. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1461–1500. doi:10.1086/228672.
Link, B. G., Cullen, F. T., Struening, E., Shrout, P. E., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (1989). A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: An empirical assessment. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 400–423. doi:10.2307/2095613.
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.
McCartan, K. F. (2010). Student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(4), 265–288. doi:10.1080/10683160802614144.
Michaels, P. J., & Corrigan, P. W. (2013). Measuring mental illness stigma with diminished social desirability effects. Journal of Mental Health, 22(3), 218–226. doi:10.3109/09638237.2012.734652.
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1003424
Pachankis, J. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive–affective–behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 328–345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.328.
Ray, J. J. (1984). The reliability of short social desirability scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 133–134. doi:10.1080/00224545.1984.9924522.
Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004.
Seto, M. C. (2007). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Seto, M. C. (2012). Is pedophilia a sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 231–236. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9882-6.
Seto, M. C. (2017). The puzzle of male chronophilias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 3–22. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0799-y.
Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Roland Imhoff and Sara Jahnke declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
Introduction
In this study, we are interested in your view of sexual minorities.
Please read the following information carefully, as you will be asked about some of the details later.
Pedophilia Label, Low Intentionality
As you might know, there is a long-lasting debate about the choice individuals have over the objects of their sexual desire. This is particularly relevant for socially unaccepted sexual objects like prepubescent children in the case of pedophiles. Despite all controversies, researchers have reached a growing consensus over the past years that pedophilia is something that individuals cannot control at all.
Although this may not be true for every individual in any situation, most individuals can just not make a conscious decision to change their deviant impulses. It is thus impossible for them to intentionally acquire a socially more acceptable sexual interest instead, not even with the support of therapeutical training.
Before asking you about your view on pedophilia, it is important for us to know to what extent you are or were aware of the above-mentioned facts.
Pedophilia Label, High Intentionality
As you might know, there is a long-lasting debate about the choice individuals have over the objects of their sexual desire. This is particularly relevant for socially unaccepted sexual objects like prepubescent children in the case of pedophiles. Despite all controversies, researchers have reached a growing consensus over the past years that pedophilia is something that individuals can control to a certain degree.
Although this may not be true for every individual in any situation, most individuals can make a conscious decision at some point in their life to either submit to their deviant impulses or actively acquire a socially more acceptable sexual interest by therapeutical training.
Before asking you about your view on pedophilia, it is important for us to know to what extent you are or were aware of the above-mentioned facts.
No Label, Low Intentionality
As you might know, there is a long-lasting debate about the choice individuals have over the objects of their sexual desire. This is particularly relevant for socially unaccepted sexual objects like prepubescent children. Despite all controversies, researchers have reached a growing consensus over the past years that sexual interest in prepubescent children is something that individuals cannot control at all.
Although this may not be true for every individual in any situation, most individuals can just not make a conscious decision to change their deviant impulses. It is thus impossible for them to intentionally acquire a socially more acceptable sexual interest instead, not even with the support of therapeutical training.
Before asking you about your view on sexual interest in prepubescent children, it is important for us to know to what extent you are or were aware of the above-mentioned facts.
No Label, High Intentionality
As you might know, there is a long-lasting debate about the choice individuals have over the objects of their sexual desire. This is particularly relevant for socially unaccepted sexual objects like prepubescent children. Despite all controversies, researchers have reached a growing consensus over the past years that sexual interest in prepubescent children is something that individuals can control to a certain degree.
Although this may not be true for every individual in any situation, most individuals can make a conscious decision at some point in their life to submit to their deviant impulses or actively acquire a socially more acceptable sexual interest by therapeutical training.
Before asking you about your view on sexual interest in prepubescent children, it is important for us to know to what extent you are or were aware of the above-mentioned facts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imhoff, R., Jahnke, S. Determinants of Punitive Attitudes Toward People with Pedophilia: Dissecting Effects of the Label and Intentionality Ascriptions. Arch Sex Behav 47, 353–361 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1048-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1048-8