The present research explored sexual minority individuals’ ratings of two traditional (Kinsey and Klein Sexual Orientation Grid [KSOG]) and two novel (Sexual-Romantic and Gender Inclusive) sexual orientation scales with regard to how well they capture their sexuality. Participants included 363 sexual minority individuals who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, or queer, and included individuals who identified as transgender (n = 85) and cisgender (n = 278). The findings indicated clear patterns of responses across both sexual orientation and gender identity, where participants differed in the degree to which they felt the scales captured their sexuality. A main effect of sexual orientation was found for all four scales, where participants endorsing monosexual (lesbian/gay) identities rated the scales more positively than did participants endorsing plurisexual (bisexual and pansexual/queer) identities. Bisexual individuals had a unique pattern of ratings, which sometimes aligned with those of lesbian/gay participants and sometimes aligned with pansexual/queer participants. A main effect of gender identity was found for the Kinsey, KSOG, and Sexual-Romantic (but not Gender Inclusive) scales, where cisgender individuals rated the scales more positively than did transgender individuals. There were no significant interaction effects between sexual orientation and gender identity for any of the four scales. The present findings can be used to understand sexual minority individuals’ assessment of the face validity of four sexual orientation measures. Discussion focused on the implications for using traditional measures of sexual orientation in research as well as for the development of new measures that better capture the range of sexual minority experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We use plurisexual to refer to identities that are not explicitly based on attraction to one sex and leave open the potential for attraction to more than one sex/gender (e.g., bisexual, pansexual, queer, and fluid). Plurisexual is used instead of non-monosexual because it does not linguistically assume monosexual as the ideal conceptualization of sexuality (see Galupo et al., 2014b).
Gender identity is typically described as an individual’s private understanding of themselves as male, female, both, or neither (Tate, 2014). Cisgender and transgender are labels that can be used to describe the relationship between an individual’s gender identity and sex assigned at birth (SAB); cisgender individuals have a gender identity that is the same as their SAB, and transgender individuals have a gender identity that is different from their SAB.
Although pansexual and queer participants did not significantly differ on their validity ratings for any the scales, queer participants (M = 27.14) were significantly older than pansexual participants (M = 24.44) and were more likely to identify as transgender (55 vs. 38%).
Anzaldua, G. (1990). Bridge, drawbridge, sandbar or island: Lesbians-of-color hacienda alianzas. In L. Albrecht & R. M. Brewer (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances (pp. 216–231). Philadelphia, PA: New Society.
Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). Berlin: Springer Science.
Callis, A. S. (2014). Bisexual, pansexual, queer: Non-binary identities and the sexual borderlands. Sexualities, 17, 63–80. doi:10.1177/1363460713511094.
Collins, P. H. (2000). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 156–176). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
Devor, H. (1993). Sexual orientation identities, attractions, and practices of female-to-male transsexuals. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 303–315.
Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110(1), 173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.
Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
Dozier, R. (2005). Beards, breasts, and bodies: Doing sex in a gendered world. Gender & Society, 19, 297–316. doi:10.1177/0891243204272153.
Flanders, C. E. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: Under the bisexual umbrella of identity and experience. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 1–6. doi:10.1080/15299716.2017.1297145.
Flanders, C. E., Lebreton, M. E., Robinson, M., Bian, J., & Caravaca-Morera, J. A. (2017). Defining bisexuality: Young bisexual and pansexual people’s voices. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 39–57. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1227016.
Flore, J. (2014). Mismeasures of asexual desires. In K. J. Cerankowski & M. Milks (Eds.), Asexualities: Feminist and queer perspectives (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
Futty, J. T. (2010). Challenges posed by transgender-passing within ambiguities and interrelations. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 57–75.
Galupo, M. P., Bauerband, L. A., Gonzalez, K. A., Hagen, D. B., Hether, S., & Krum, T. (2014a). Transgender friendship experiences: Benefits and barriers of friendships across gender identity and sexual orientation. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 183–215. doi:10.1177/0959353514526218.
Galupo, M. P., Davis, K. S., Grynkiewicz, A. L., & Mitchell, R. C. (2014b). Conceptualization of sexual orientation identity among sexual minorities: Patterns across sexual and gender identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 14, 433–456. doi:10.1080/15299716.2014.933466.
Galupo, M. P., Henise, S. B., & Mercer, N. L. (2016). “The labels don’t work very well”: Transgender individuals’ conceptualizations of sexual orientation and sexual identity. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17, 1–12. doi:10.1080/15532739.2016.1189373.
Galupo, M. P., Lomash, E., & Mitchell, R. C. (2017a). “All of my lovers fit into this scale”: Sexual minority individuals’ responses to two novel measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 145–165. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1174027.
Galupo, M. P., Mitchell, R. C., & Davis, K. S. (2015). Sexual minority self-identification: Multiple identities and complexity. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, 2, 355–364. doi:10.1037/sgd0000131.
Galupo, M. P., Mitchell, R. C., Grynkiewicz, A. L., & Davis, K. S. (2014c). Sexual minority reflections on the Kinsey Scale and the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Bisexuality, 14, 404–432. doi:10.1080/15299716.2014.929553.
Galupo, M. P., Ramirez, J. L., & Pulice-Farrow, L. (2017b). “Regardless of their gender”: Descriptions of sexual identity among bisexual, pansexual, and queer identified individuals. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 108–124. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1228491.
Hines, S. (2010). Sexing gender/gendering sex: Towards an intersectional analysis of transgender. In Y. Taylor, S. Hines, & M. Casey (Eds.), Theorising intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 140–162). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Keppel, B., & Hamilton, A. (1998). Using the Klein Scale to teach about sexual orientation. Boston: Bisexual Resource Center. Retrieved from http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/BRC/1994/klein.txt-07.94
King, D. (1990). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. In M. Malson, E. Mudimbe-Boyi, J. F. O’Barr, & M. Wyer (Eds.), Black women in America: Social science perspectives (pp. 265–296). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multivariate dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–49. doi:10.1300/J082v11n01_04.
Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.596954.
Lapointe, A. A. (2017). “It’s not pans, it’s people”: Student and teacher perspectives on bisexuality and pansexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 88–107. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1196157.
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lev, A. (2004). Transgender emergence: Therapeutic guidelines for working with gender-variant people and their families. New York: Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
McCabe, S. E., Hughes, T. L., Bostwick, W., Morales, M., & Boyd, C. J. (2012). Measurement of sexual identity in surveys: Implications for substance abuse research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 649–657. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9768-7.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800. doi:10.1086/426800.
Meier, S. C., Pardo, S. T., Labuski, C., & Babcock, J. (2013). Measures of clinical health among female-to-male transgender persons as a function of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 463–474. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0052-2.
Mereish, E. H., Katz-Wise, S. L., & Woulfe, J. (2017). We’re here and we’re queer: Sexual orientation and sexual fluidity differences between bisexual and queer women. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 125–139. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1217448.
Mitchell, R. C., Davis, K. S., & Galupo, M. P. (2015). Comparing perceived experiences of sexual prejudice among plurisexual individuals. Psychology & Sexuality, 6, 245–257. doi:10.1080/19419899.2014.940372.
Monro, S., & Richardson, D. (2010). Intersectionality and sexuality: The case of sexuality and transgender equalities work in UK local government. In Y. Taylor, S. Hines, & M. Casey (Eds.), Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 99–118). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Morandini, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2016). Who adopts queer and pansexual identities. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1249332.
Morgan, E. M. (2012). Not always a straight path: College students’ narratives of heterosexual identity development. Sex Roles, 66, 79–93. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0068-4.
Morgan, E. M. (2013). Contemporary issues in sexual orientation and identity development in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 52–66. doi:10.1037/a0014572.
Morgan, E. M., & Thompson, E. M. (2006). Young women’s sexual experiences within same-sex friendships: Discovering and defining bisexual and bi-curious sexual identity. Journal of Bisexuality, 6, 7–34. doi:10.1300/J159v06n03_02.
Nagoshi, J. L., & Brzuzy, S. (2010). Transgender theory: Embodying research and practice. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 25, 431–443. doi:10.1177/0886109910384068.
Pega, F., Gray, A., Veale, J. F., Binson, D., & Sell, R. L. (2013). Toward global comparability of sexual orientation data in official statistics: A conceptual framework of sexual orientation for health data collection in New Zealand’s official statistics system. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 8, 1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/473451.
Przybylo, E. (2013). Producing facts: Empirical asexuality and the scientific study of sex. Feminism & Psychology, 23, 221–242. doi:10.1177/0959353512443668.
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 1–21. doi:10.1300/J082v49n01-01.
Rosario, M., & Schrimshaw, E. W. (2014). Theories and etiologies of sexual orientation. In D. L. Tolman & L. M. Diamond (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology. Person-based approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 555–596). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rust, P. C. (2000). Too many and not enough: The meaning of bisexual identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 1, 31–68. doi:10.1300/J159v01n01_04.
Savin-Williams, R. C. (2010). Sexual orientation label (7-point). Retrieved from http://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/sexgender/research.cfm.
Savin-Williams, R. C. (2014). An exploratory study of the categorical versus spectrum nature of sexual orientation. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 446–453. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.871691.
Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33, 58–88. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.01.001.
Sell, R. L. (1997). Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 643–658. doi:10.1023/A:1024528427013.
Sell, R. L., & Perulio, C. (1996). Sampling homosexuals, bisexuals, gays and lesbians for public health research: A review of the literature from 1990 to 1992. Journal of Homosexuality, 30, 31–47. doi:10.1300/J082v30n04_02.
Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.
Storms, M. D. (1980). Theories of sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 783–792. doi:10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1993.
Tate, C. C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental perspectives, and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Thompson, E. M., & Morgan, E. M. (2008). “Mostly straight” young women: Variations in sexual behavior and identity development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 15–21. doi:10.1037/0012-16188.8.131.52.
Trujillo, C. (1991). Chicana lesbians: The girls our mothers warned us about. Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.
van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8.
Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: New sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 85–101. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9921-y.
Weinrich, J. D., & Klein, F. (2002). Bi-gay, bi-straight, and bi-bi. Journal of Bisexuality, 2, 109–139. doi:10.1300/J159v02n04_07.
Worthington, R. L., & Reynolds, A. L. (2009). Within-group differences in sexual orientation and identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 44–55. doi:10.1037/a0013498.
This study was funded by the American Institute of Bisexuality awarded to M. Paz Galupo.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix: Novel Measures of Sexual Orientation
Appendix: Novel Measures of Sexual Orientation
Sexual-Romantic scale a
I am sexually attracted to individuals of the same-sex
I am romantically attracted to individuals of the same-sex
I am sexually attracted to individuals of the other-sex
I am romantically attracted to individuals of the other-sex
Gender Inclusive scale a
I am attracted to individuals of the same-sexb
I am attracted to individuals of the same-sexb
I am attracted to masculine individuals
I am attracted to feminine individuals
I am attracted to androgynous individuals
I am attracted to gender non-conforming individuals
About this article
Cite this article
Galupo, M.P., Mitchell, R.C. & Davis, K.S. Face Validity Ratings of Sexual Orientation Scales by Sexual Minority Adults: Effects of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Arch Sex Behav 47, 1241–1250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1037-y