Face Validity Ratings of Sexual Orientation Scales by Sexual Minority Adults: Effects of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
The present research explored sexual minority individuals’ ratings of two traditional (Kinsey and Klein Sexual Orientation Grid [KSOG]) and two novel (Sexual-Romantic and Gender Inclusive) sexual orientation scales with regard to how well they capture their sexuality. Participants included 363 sexual minority individuals who identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, or queer, and included individuals who identified as transgender (n = 85) and cisgender (n = 278). The findings indicated clear patterns of responses across both sexual orientation and gender identity, where participants differed in the degree to which they felt the scales captured their sexuality. A main effect of sexual orientation was found for all four scales, where participants endorsing monosexual (lesbian/gay) identities rated the scales more positively than did participants endorsing plurisexual (bisexual and pansexual/queer) identities. Bisexual individuals had a unique pattern of ratings, which sometimes aligned with those of lesbian/gay participants and sometimes aligned with pansexual/queer participants. A main effect of gender identity was found for the Kinsey, KSOG, and Sexual-Romantic (but not Gender Inclusive) scales, where cisgender individuals rated the scales more positively than did transgender individuals. There were no significant interaction effects between sexual orientation and gender identity for any of the four scales. The present findings can be used to understand sexual minority individuals’ assessment of the face validity of four sexual orientation measures. Discussion focused on the implications for using traditional measures of sexual orientation in research as well as for the development of new measures that better capture the range of sexual minority experience.
KeywordsCisgender Intersectionality Monosexual Plurisexual Sexual orientation Transgender
This study was funded by the American Institute of Bisexuality awarded to M. Paz Galupo.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Anzaldua, G. (1990). Bridge, drawbridge, sandbar or island: Lesbians-of-color hacienda alianzas. In L. Albrecht & R. M. Brewer (Eds.), Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances (pp. 216–231). Philadelphia, PA: New Society.Google Scholar
- Collins, P. H. (2000). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 156–176). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Flore, J. (2014). Mismeasures of asexual desires. In K. J. Cerankowski & M. Milks (Eds.), Asexualities: Feminist and queer perspectives (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Futty, J. T. (2010). Challenges posed by transgender-passing within ambiguities and interrelations. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 57–75.Google Scholar
- Galupo, M. P., Bauerband, L. A., Gonzalez, K. A., Hagen, D. B., Hether, S., & Krum, T. (2014a). Transgender friendship experiences: Benefits and barriers of friendships across gender identity and sexual orientation. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 183–215. doi: 10.1177/0959353514526218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Keppel, B., & Hamilton, A. (1998). Using the Klein Scale to teach about sexual orientation. Boston: Bisexual Resource Center. Retrieved from http://www.qrd.org/qrd/orgs/BRC/1994/klein.txt-07.94
- King, D. (1990). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. In M. Malson, E. Mudimbe-Boyi, J. F. O’Barr, & M. Wyer (Eds.), Black women in America: Social science perspectives (pp. 265–296). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lev, A. (2004). Transgender emergence: Therapeutic guidelines for working with gender-variant people and their families. New York: Haworth Clinical Practice Press.Google Scholar
- Monro, S., & Richardson, D. (2010). Intersectionality and sexuality: The case of sexuality and transgender equalities work in UK local government. In Y. Taylor, S. Hines, & M. Casey (Eds.), Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 99–118). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pega, F., Gray, A., Veale, J. F., Binson, D., & Sell, R. L. (2013). Toward global comparability of sexual orientation data in official statistics: A conceptual framework of sexual orientation for health data collection in New Zealand’s official statistics system. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 8, 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2013/473451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Savin-Williams, R. C. (2010). Sexual orientation label (7-point). Retrieved from http://www.human.cornell.edu/hd/sexgender/research.cfm.
- Tate, C. C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental perspectives, and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Trujillo, C. (1991). Chicana lesbians: The girls our mothers warned us about. Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.Google Scholar