Asexual Identity in a New Zealand National Sample: Demographics, Well-Being, and Health
Academic interest in asexuality has increased in recent years; however, there is yet to be a national probability study exploring the correlates of self-identifying as asexual. Here, we utilized data from the 2014/15 New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. Past research has typically used attraction-based measures; however, we asked participants to describe their sexual orientation using a self-generated, open-ended item, and 0.4% (n = 44) self-identified as asexual. We then compared self-identified asexual participants with a heterosexual reference group (n = 11,822) across a large number of demographic, psychological, and health variables. Relative to heterosexuals, self-identified asexual participants were (1) more likely to be women, and (2) substantially less likely to be cisgender, (3) in a serious romantic relationship, or (4) a parent. No deleterious mental or physical health effects were associated with asexuality when compared to heterosexuality. This study provides the first attempt at measuring self-identification as asexual in a national sample and highlights core similarities and differences between those who identify as asexual and heterosexual.
KeywordsAsexuality Sexual orientation Sexual identity
Lara Greaves was supported by a University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship during the preparation of this article.
As per the NZAVS data access statement, a copy of the anonymous data reported in each NZAVS publication is available from CS upon request from appropriately qualified researchers. Such data will be provided with the explicit understanding that it is used solely for the purposes of replicating or otherwise checking the validity of analyses reported in scientific papers analyzing NZAVS data.
This research was supported by a Templeton World Charity Foundation Grant (ID: 0077). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study
- Atkinson, J., Salmond, C. E., & Crampton, P. (2014). NZDep2013 index of deprivation. Wellington: Department of Public Health, University of Otago.Google Scholar
- Bogaert, A. F. (2012). Understanding asexuality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 37–67.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 49, 71–75.Google Scholar
- Gazzola, S. B., & Morrison, M. A. (2011). Asexuality: An emergent sexual orientation. In T. G. Morrison, M. A. Morrison, M. A. Carrigan, & D. T. McDermott (Eds.), Sexual minority research in the new millennium (pp. 21–44). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
- Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J. L., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Retrieved from http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf
- Greaves, L. M. (2014). Statistical standard for coding sexual orientation. NZAVS Technical Documents, e20. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e20-Sexual-Orientation-Statistical-Standard.xlsx
- Herek, G. M., Norton, A. T., Allen, T. J., & Sims, C. L. (2010). Demographic, psychological, and social characteristics of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in a US probability sample. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 176–200. doi:10.1007/s13178-010-0017-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kessler, R. C., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Bromet, E., Cuitan, M., … Zaslavsky, A. M. (2010). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19, 4–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Krynen, A., Osborne, D., Duck, I. M., Houkamau, C., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Measuring psychological distress in New Zealand: Item response properties and demographic differences in the Kessler-6 screening measure. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 69–83.Google Scholar
- Pagan Westphal, S. (2004). October). Glad to be asexual. New Scientist, 184, 40–43.Google Scholar
- Rothblum, E. (2008). Finding a large and thriving lesbian and bisexual community: The costs and benefits of caring. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 4, 69–79.Google Scholar
- Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, CA: Seal.Google Scholar
- Sibley, C. G. (2015). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS Technical Documents, e01). Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e01-Sampling-Procedure-and-Sample-Details.pdf