Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 7, pp 1993–2006 | Cite as

Understanding When a Partner Is Not in the Mood: Sexual Communal Strength in Couples Transitioning to Parenthood

  • Amy Muise
  • James J. Kim
  • Emily A. Impett
  • Natalie O. Rosen
Original Paper

Abstract

Situations in which one partner is interested in having sex but the other partner is not “in the mood” are common in relationships. We extend previous work on sexual communal strength—the motivation to be responsive to a partner’s sexual needs—to demonstrate that in addition to the motivation to meet a partner’s need to have sex, the motivation to be understanding about a partner’s need not to engage in sex is uniquely associated with sexual and relationship satisfaction. In Study 1, we adapted a measure of sexual communal strength for having sex (SCSS) to create a new measure of sexual communal strength for not having sex (SCSN). We demonstrated that SCSN is distinct from SCSS and associated with more positive and less negative responses to an imagined situation of sexual rejection. In Study 2, both SCSS and SCSN were uniquely associated with greater sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples transitioning to parenthood—a time when many couples experience changes to their sexual relationship. Having a partner who is higher in SCSN is associated with greater sexual satisfaction and relationship quality for new mothers but not new fathers, suggesting that during the transition to parenthood, it might be more important for women to have a partner who is understanding about their need not to engage in sex. The results suggest that the motivation to be understanding about a partner’s need not to engage in sex may be an additional way that partners can show communal care in their sexual relationships.

Keywords

Sexual motivation Sexual satisfaction Relationship satisfaction Transition to parenthood Couples Sexual communal strength 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by an IWK Health Centre postdoctoral fellowship and a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Banting postdoctoral fellowship awarded to Amy Muise, grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the IWK Health Center awarded to Natalie O. Rosen and Emily A. Impett, a SSHRC Insight Grant awarded to Emily A. Impett and Amy Muise, and a SSHRC CGS fellowship awarded to James J. Kim.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have conflict of interests to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Toronto (Study 1) and Dalhousie University (Study 2).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ahlborg, T., Dahlöf, L. G., & Hallberg, L. R. M. (2005). Quality of the intimate and sexual relationship in first time parents six months after delivery. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 167–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Apt, C., & Hurlbert, D. F. (1992). Motherhood and female sexuality beyond one year postpartum: A study of military wives. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belsky, J., & Kelly, J. (1994). The transition to parenthood: How a first child changes a marriage: Why some couples grow closer and others apart: Based on a landmark study. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex, and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byers, E. S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predictive initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabitating heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. R. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 232–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Condon, J. T., Boyce, P., & Corkindale, C. J. (2004). The First-Time Father’s Study: A prospective study of the mental health and wellbeing of men during the transition to parenthood. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 56–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10, 1–8.Google Scholar
  11. Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2000). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, S., Katz, J., & Jackson, J. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 553–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Day, L. C., & Impett, E. A. (2015). For it is in giving that we receive: The benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships. In C. Knee & H. T. Reis (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 1: Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 211–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Day, L. C., Muise, A., Joel, S., & Impett, E. A. (2015). To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(6), 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fehr, B. (2013). The social psychology of love. In J. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 201–233). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fischman, S. H., Rankin, E. A., Soeken, K. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1986). Changes in sexual relationships in postpartum couples. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Neonatal Nursing, 15, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritz, H. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and over involvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 121–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haugen, E. N., Schmutzer, P. A., & Wenzel, A. (2004). Sexuality and the partner relationship during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Specher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 411–435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Impett, E. A., Gable, S. L., & Peplau, L. A. (2005). The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Rosen, N. O. (2015). Is it good to giving in the bedroom? A prosocial perspective on sexual health and well-being in romantic relationships. Current Sexual Health Reports, 7, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobson, N. S., Christensen, A., Prince, S. E., Cordova, J., & Eldridge, K. (2000). Integrative behavioral couple therapy: An acceptance-based, promising new treatment for couple discord. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 351–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, J. J., Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Not in the mood? How do people reject their partner for sex and how does it matter? Paper presented at the Canadian Sex Research Forum, Kelowna, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Kogan, A., Impett, E. A., Oveis, C., Hui, B., Gordon, A., & Keltner, D. (2010). When giving feels good: The intrinsic benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships for the communally motivated. Psychological Science, 21, 1918–1924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Le, B. M., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., Webster, G. D., & Cheng, C. (2013). The personal and interpersonal benefits of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 695–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maas, M. K., McDaniel, B. T., Feinberg, M. E., & Jones, D. E. (2015). Division of labor and multiple domains of sexual satisfaction among first-time parents. Journal of Family Issues. doi:10.1177/0192513X15604343.Google Scholar
  30. Mark, K. P. (2012). The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mark, K. P., & Murray, S. H. (2012). Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 38, 198–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mills, J. R., Clark, M. S., Ford, T. E., & Johnson, M. (2004). Measurement of communal strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2009). Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 848–852.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2012). Are you game? The benefits of sexual communal strength. Paper presented at the Canadian Sex Research Forum, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  35. Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Good, giving, and game: The relationship benefits of communal sexual motivation. Social Psychological and Personality Sciences, 6(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Applying theories of communal motivation to sexuality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., & Desmarais, S. (2013a). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320–1332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Muise, A., Impett, E. A., Desmarais, S., & Kogan, A. (2013b). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Sciences, 4, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Sciences, 7, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neff, K. D., & Harter, S. (2002). The role of power and authenticity in relationship styles emphasizing autonomy, connectedness, or mutuality among adult couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 835–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Péloquin, K., & Lafontaine, M.-F. (2010). Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 146–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinquart, M., & Teubert, D. (2010). Effects of parenting education with expectant and new parents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 316–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Risch, G. S., Riley, L. A., & Lawler, M. G. (2003). Problematic issues in the early years of marriage: Content for premarital education. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 253–269.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, N. O., Mooney, K., & Muise, A. (2016). Dyadic empathy in the transition to parenthood: Associations with sexual, relationship, and psychological well-being. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2016.1208698.Google Scholar
  46. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakaluk, J. K., & Short, S. D. (2017). A methodological review of exploratory factor analysis in sexuality research: Used practices, best practices, and data analysis resources. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1–9. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schlagintweit, H., Bailey, K., & Rosen, N. O. (2016). A new baby in the bedroom: Frequency and severity of postpartum sexual concerns and their associations with relationship satisfaction in new parent couples. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13, 1455–1465. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.08.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Serati, M., Salvatore, S., Siesto, G., Cattoni, E., Zanirato, M., Khullar, V., … Bolis, P. (2010). Female sexual function during pregnancy and after childbirth. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 2782–2790.Google Scholar
  50. Shapiro, F. A., Gottman, J. M., & Carrère, S. (2000). The baby and the marriage: Identifying factors that buffer against declines in marital satisfaction after the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 59–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. O., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. von Sydow, K. (1999). Sexuality during pregnancy and after childbirth: A metacontent analysis of 59 studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woolhouse, H., McDonald, E., & Brown, S. (2012). Women’s experiences of sex and intimacy after childbirth: Making the adjustment to motherhood. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 33, 185–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu, T., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2010). The interactive effects of marital conflict and divorce on parent-adult children’s relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 282–292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Toronto MississaugaMississaugaCanada
  4. 4.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyIWK Health CentreHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations