Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 73–85 | Cite as

The Sexual Orientation and Gender Presentation of Hijra, Kothi, and Panthi in Mumbai, India

  • Matthew StiefEmail author
Special Section: The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation

Abstract

Cultural categories related to sexuality and gender vary considerably cross-culturally. While Western cultures categorize people primarily in terms of sexual attractions (i.e., gay, straight, bisexual), many cultures distinguish between groups based on additional issues such as gender role presentation and position preference in anal sex (i.e., insertive/receptive). The current study gathered data on three categories of natal males in Mumbai, India—hijra, kothi, and panthi (N = 93). Hijra are androphilic (sexually attracted to adult men), typically sexually receptive, transgender, sometimes castrated, and live in fictive kinship networks that are hierarchically organized. Kothi are also androphilic, typically sexual receptive and relatively feminine but less so than hijra; unlike hijra, kothi are never castrated. Hijra and kothi were understood by some participants to be mutually compatible, and so three groups were identified—those endorsing hijra only (n = 11), kothi only (n = 22), and both hijra and kothi (n = 22). Panthi (n = 38) are the masculine insertive partners of hijra and kothi. Measures employed were self-report and viewing time measures of sexual attraction, sexual behavior and position preference, self-described masculinity/femininity, recalled childhood gender atypicality, gendered occupational preferences, and gender presentation milestones (i.e., wearing female clothes, castration). All hijra and kothi groups were found to be exclusively androphilic in viewing time and self-reported sexual attractions, and to be gender-atypical on all measures. Panthi were found to be relatively male-typical and to have a bisexual pattern of viewing time and self-reported sexual attractions. Kothi were found to be less extreme in their female typicality and to report less female gender presentation milestones than hijra or hijra/kothi. Most hijra and hijra/kothi and all kothi said that they were not castrated. Contrary to the manner in which they are socially defined, a third of panthi report having been receptive in anal sex, and a third of all hijra and kothi groups report having been insertive at some time.

Keywords

Sexual orientation Sexual identity Gender atypicality India Hijra Kothi Panthi 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by the Department of Human Development, Cornell University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Cornell University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Altman, D. (1996). Rupture or continuity? The internationalization of gay identities. Social Text, 48, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, A. P. (2009). The organizational–activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 570–578.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 43–63). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-atypical behavior and sexual orientation: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, N. H., & Vasey, P. L. (2006). A retrospective study of childhood gender-atypical behavior in Samoan fa’afafine. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 659–666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Besharat, M. A., Karimi, S., & Saadati, M. (2016). A comparison of childhood gender nonconformity and fertility rate in a lineage in male homosexuals and heterosexuals. Contemporary Psychology, 10, 3–14.Google Scholar
  7. Boa, A., & Swaab, D. F. (2011). Sexual differentiation of the human brain: Relation to gender identity, sexual orientation and neuropsychiatric disorders. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boellstorff, T. (2003). Dubbing culture: Indonesian gay and lesbi subjectivities and ethnography in an already globalized world. American Ethnologist, 30, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyce, P. (2007). ‘Conceiving Kothis’: Men who have sex with men in India and the cultural subject of HIV prevention. Medical Anthropology, 26, 175–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Callender, C., & Kochems, L. M. (1983). The North American berdache. Current Anthropology, 24, 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dolezal, C., Nieves, L., Díaz, F., Decena, C., & Balan, I. (2004). Looking for a tall, dark, macho man … sexual-role behaviour variations in Latino gay and bisexual men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardoso, F. L. (2005). Cultural universals and differences in male homosexuality: The case of a Brazilian fishing village. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 103–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardoso, F. L. (2009). Recalled sex-typed behavior in childhood and sports preferences in adulthood of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual men from Brazil, Turkey, and Thailand. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 726–736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiñas, B. N. (1992). The Isthmus Zapotecs: A matrifocal culture of Mexico. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, L. (1995). The pleasures of castration: The postoperative status of Hijras, Jankhas and Academics. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 276–304). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, L. (2005). The Kothi wars: AIDS cosmopolitanism and the morality of classification. In V. Adams & S. L. Pigg (Eds.), Sex in development (pp. 269–303). Durham, NC: Durham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleischman, D. S., Fessler, D. M. T., & Cholakians, A. E. (2015). Testing the affiliation hypothesis of homoerotic motivation in humans: The effects of progesterone and priming. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1395–1404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  20. Green, R. (1985). Gender identity in childhood and later sexual orientation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 339–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Halperin, D. (1995). Saint Foucault: Towards a gay hagiography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Herdt, G. (Ed.). (1996). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  23. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Nordsiek, U., Luzar, C., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2010). Viewing time effects revisited: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1275–1288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Wie, S., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2012). Vicarious viewing time: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task-or-stimulus-specific processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1389–1401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 551–558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, P. (2003). Performative genders perverse desires: A bio-history of Thailands same-sex and transgender cultures. Intersections: Gender History and Culture in the Asian Context, 9, 43.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, L. L., Bradley, S. J., Birkenfeld-Adams, A. S., Radzins Kuksis, M. A., Maing, D. M., Mitchell, J. N., & Zucker, K. J. (2004). A parent-report Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 105–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalra, G., & Shah, N. (2013). The cultural, psychiatric, and sexuality aspects of hijras in India. International Journal of Transgenderism, 14, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan, S. (2001). Culture, sexualities, and identities: Men who have sex with men in India. Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 99–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Khan, S. I., Hussain, M. I., Parveen, S., Bhuiyan, I., Gourab, G., Sarker, G. F., … Sikder, J. (2009). Living on the extreme margin: Social exclusion of the transgender population (hijra) in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 27, 441–451.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Khan, A. A., Rehan, N., Qayyum, K., & Khan, A. (2008). Correlates and prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Hijras (male transgenders) in Pakistan. International Journal of STD and AIDS, 19, 817–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual difference and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the “People-Things” dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lippa, R. A. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual-heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. Journal of Personality, 68, 899–926.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lippa, R. A. (2005). Subdomains of gender-related occupational interests: Do they form a cohesive bipolar M-F dimension? Journal of Personality, 73, 693–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lippa, R. A. (2010). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lippa, R. A. (2013). Men and women with bisexual identities show bisexual patterns of sexual attraction to male and female “swimsuit models.” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 187–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lippa, R. A., & Tan, F. D. (2001). Does culture moderate the relationship between sexual orientation and gender-related personality traits? Cross-Cultural Research, 35, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manalansan, M. F., IV. (2003). Global divas: Filipino gay men in the diaspora. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McIntosh, M. (1968). The homosexual role. Social Problems, 16, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nanda, S. (1990). Neither man nor woman. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  41. Norton, R. (1997). The myth of the modern homosexual: Queer history and the search for cultural unity. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  42. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2015). Viewing time measures of sexual orientation in Samoan cisgender men who engage in sexual interactions with fa’afafine. PLoS ONE, 10, e0116529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116529.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2016a). Reconsidering male bisexuality: Sexual activity role and sexual attraction in Samoan men who engage in sexual interactions with fa’afafine. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petterson, L. J, Wrightson, C. & Vasey, P. L. (2016b). Recalled gendered behavior in childhood: A comparison of androphilic men, gynephilic men, and androphilic women in Japan. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0781-8.Google Scholar
  46. Poepple, T. B., Langguth, B., Rupprecht, R., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2016). A neural circuit encoding sexual preference in humans. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reddy, G. (2005). With respect to sex: Negotiating hijra identity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015). Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS ONE, 7, e40256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Semenyna, S. W., & Vasey, P. L. (2016). The relationship between adult occupational preferences and childhood gender nonconformity among Samoan women, men, and fa’afafine. Human Nature, 27, 283–295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh, D. (2012). A follow-up study of boys with gender identity disorder. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  54. Stein, E. (Ed.). (1990). Forms of desire: Sexual orientation and the social constructionist controversy. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  55. VanderLaan, D. P., Gothreau, L., Bartlett, N. H., & Vasey, P. L. (2011). Recalled separation anxiety and gender atypicality in childhood: A study of Canadian heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1233–1240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. VanderLaan, D. P., Ren, Z., & Vasey, P. L. (2013). Male androphilia in the ancestral environment: An ethological analysis. Human Nature, 24, 375–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Vasey, P. L., & Bartlett, N. H. (2007). What can the Samoan “fa’afafine” teach us about the Western concept of gender identity disorder in childhood? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 481–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2014). Evolving research on the evolution of male androphilia. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vasey, P. L., VanderLaan, D. P., Gothreau, L. M., & Barlett, N. H. (2011). Traits of separation anxiety in childhood: A retrospective study of Samoan men, women, and fa’afafine. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 511–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Whitam, F. L. (1980). The prehomosexual male child in three societies: The United States, Guatemala, Brazil. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9, 87–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zheng, L., Hart, T. A., & Zheng, Y. (2012). The relationship between intercourse preference positions and personality traits among gay men in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 683–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zheng, L., Lippa, R. A., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 533–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations