Orienting Basic Research on Chronophilias
Seto (2016) has provided a stimulating conceptual review of the chronophilias as potential sexual orientations, mostly focusing on pedohebephilia. While largely agreeing with him, we offer several clarifications, elaborations, and speculations, in the spirit of motivating basic research in this interesting and important area.
Seto (2016) suggests we define sexual orientation expansively, as “a stable tendency to preferentially orient—in terms of attention, interest, attraction, and genital arousal—to particular classes of sexual stimuli.” He continues: “If we accept this broader definition, then we can imagine that individuals actually have multiple sexual orientations rather than a single sexual orientation, corresponding to their sexual preferences along a variety of different dimensions, including age.”
For several reasons, we believe that this approach is unhelpful. First, sexual orientation has routinely been distinguished from sexual identity and sexual behavior, because of the...
KeywordsSexual Orientation Sexual Arousal Sexual Interest Sexual Stimulus Arousal Pattern
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interests related to this article.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Bergner, D. (2009). The other side of desire: Four journeys into the far realms of lust and longing. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Blanchard, R., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., & Dickey, R. (2006). Phallometric comparison of pedophilic interest in nonadmitting sexual offenders against stepdaughters, biologically related girls, and unrelated girls. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lykins, A. D., Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., & Blanchard, R. (2010). Sexual arousal to female children in gynephilic men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 279–289.Google Scholar
- Moser, C. (2001). Paraphilia: A critique of a confused concept. In P. J. Kleinplatz (Ed.), New directions in sex therapy: Innovations and alternatives (pp. 91–108). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seto, M. C., & Lalumière, M. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15–25.Google Scholar