Is Male Androphilia a Context-Dependent Cross-Cultural Universal?

Abstract

The cross-cultural ethnographic literature has traditionally used the label male “homosexuality” to describe sexual relationships between biological males without considering whether or not the concept encompasses primary sexual attraction to adult males. Although male androphilia seems to be found in all national populations, its universal existence in tribal populations has been questioned. Our goal is to review previous cross-cultural classifications and surveys of male same sex behavior to present a system that does justice to its varied expressions, especially as it is informed by contemporary sexuality research. Previous comparative research does not effectively distinguish male same sex behavior from male androphilia. Using the standard cross-cultural sample (SCCS) as a sampling frame and the ethnographic sources in the human relations area files and elsewhere, we present distributional data on various forms of male same sex behavior. The SCCS is useful because it is designed to be representative of all historically known social formations and the sample is designed to reduce similarities as a consequence of common descent or historical origin as well as reduce the probability of diffusion of sociocultural practices from one culture to another. Our results show that male same sex behavior as well as male androphilia is much more common than previously estimated in the SCCS. With our findings, we make an argument that male androphilia is a context-dependent cross-cultural universal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 524–536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey, J. M., & Pillard, R. C. (1991). A genetic study of male sexual orientation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48(12), 1089–1096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, N. V., Gregware, P. R., & Cassidy, M. A. (1999). Family killing fields: Honor rationales in the murder of women. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber, N. (1998). Ecological and psychosocial correlates of male homosexuality: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barthes, J., Godelle, B., & Raymond, M. (2013). Human social stratification and hypergyny: Toward an understanding of male homosexual preference. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blanchard, R. (1997). Birth order and sibling sex ratio in homosexual versus heterosexual males and females. Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bogaert, A. F., & Skorska, M. (2011). Sexual orientation, fraternal birth order, and the maternal immune hypothesis: A review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32(2), 247–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Broude, G., & Greene, S. (1976). Cross-cultural codes on twenty sexual attitudes and practices. Ethnology, 15, 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Callender, C., & Kochems, L. M. (1983). The North American berdache [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 24(4), 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Camperio Ciani, A., Cermelli, P., & Zanzotto, G. (2008). Sexually antagonistic selection in human male homosexuality. PLoS One, 3(6), e2282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Paterson, A. D., & Bogaert, A. F. (2002). How many gay men owe their sexual orientation to fraternal birth order? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(1), 63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chapais, B. (2014). Complex kinship patterns as evolutionary constructions, and the origins of sociocultural universals. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiñas, B. (1992). The Isthmus Zapotecs: A matrifocal culture of Mexico. New York: Harcourt College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crapo, R. (1995). Factors in the cross-cultural patterning of male homosexual behavior: A reappraisal of the literature. Cross-Cultural Research, 95, 178–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Daly, M. (1978). The cost of mating. The American Naturalist, 112(986), 771–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ford, C. A., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gates, G. J. (2011, April). How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? The Williams Institute. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/09h684x2.

  22. Greenberg, D. (1988). The construction of homosexualities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gregersen, E. (1996). The world of human sexuality: Behaviors, customs, and beliefs. New York: Ardent Media.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hensley, C. (2002). Prison sex: Practice and policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hensley, C., Tewksbury, R., & Castle, T. (2003). Characteristics of prison sexual assault targets in male Oklahoma correctional facilities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(6), 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Herdt, G. (Ed.). (1984). Ritualized homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hewlett, B. S., & Hewlett, B. L. (2010). Sex and searching for children among Aka foragers and Ngandu farmers of Central Africa. African Study Monographs, 31(3), 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  28. King, M., Green, J., Osborn, D. J., Arkell, J., Hetherton, J., & Pereira, E. (2005). Family size in white gay and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 117–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kressel, G. M. (1981). Sororicide/filiacide: Homicide for family honour [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 22(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kunzel, R. G. (2008). Criminal intimacy: Prison and the uneven history of modern American sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15(4), 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marlowe, F. (2010). The Hadza: Hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Minturn, L., Grosse, M., & Haider, S. (1969). Cultural patterning of sexual beliefs and behavior. Ethnology, 8(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Murdock, G. P. (1961). Outline of cultural materials. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Murdock, G. P., & White, D. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8(4), 32–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ngun, T. C., Ghahramani, N., Sánchez, F. J., Bocklandt, S., & Vilain, E. (2011). The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32(2), 227–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rahman, Q., Collins, A., Morrison, M., Orrells, J. C., Cadinouche, K., Greenfield, S., & Begum, S. (2008). Maternal inheritance and familial fecundity factors in male homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(6), 962–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reiss, I. L. (1986). Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Syme, K. L., Garfield, Z., & Hagen, E. (2016). Testing the bargaining vs. inclusive fitness models of suicidal behavior against the ethnographic record. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(3), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. VanderLaan, D., Ren, Z., & Vasey, P. (2013). Male androphilia in the ancestral environment. Human Nature, 24(4), 375–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2011). Male sexual orientation in Independent Samoa: Evidence for fraternal birth order and maternal fecundity effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 495–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vasey, P., & VanderLaan, D. (2007). Birth order and male androphilia in Samoan fa’afafine. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 1437–1442.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2009). Maternal and avuncular tendencies in Samoa. Human Nature, 20(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2014). Evolving research on the evolution of male androphilia. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vasey, P. L., & VanderLaan, D. P. (2015). Evolutionary developmental perspectives on male androphilia in humans. In V. Zeigler-Hill, L. L. M. Welling, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 333–346). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Whitam, F. (1983). Culturally invariable properties of male homosexuality: Tentative conclusions from cross-cultural research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12(3), 207–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Williams, W. L. (1986). The spirit and the flesh: Sexual diversity in American Indian Culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Williams, W. (2000). Comment on “The evolution of human homosexual behavior” by Kirkpatrick, R. C. Current Anthropology, 41, 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paul Vasey for his excellent editorial advice and assisting us in adding several cases to our database.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond Hames.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hames, R., Garfield, Z. & Garfield, M. Is Male Androphilia a Context-Dependent Cross-Cultural Universal?. Arch Sex Behav 46, 63–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0855-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Male same sex behavior
  • Sexual orientation
  • Cross-cultural universals
  • Male androphilia
  • Ethnology