Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 265–272 | Cite as

Gay, Mostly Gay, or Bisexual Leaning Gay? An Exploratory Study Distinguishing Gay Sexual Orientations Among Young Men

  • Ritch C. Savin-WilliamsEmail author
  • Brian M. Cash
  • Mark McCormack
  • Gerulf Rieger
Special Section: The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation

Abstract

This exploratory study assessed physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures of sexual and romantic indicators of sexual orientation identities among young men (mean age = 21.9 years) with predominant same-sex sexual and romantic interests: those who described themselves as bisexual leaning gay (n = 11), mostly gay (n = 17), and gay (n = 47). Although they were not significantly distinguishable based on physiological (pupil dilation) responses to nude stimuli, on behavioral and self-report measures a descending linear trend toward the less preferred sex (female) was significant regarding sexual attraction, fantasy, genital contact, infatuation, romantic relationship, sex appeal, and gazing time to the porn stimuli. Results supported a continuum of sexuality with distinct subgroups only for the self-report measure of sexual attraction. The other behavioral and self-report measures followed the same trend but did not significantly differ between the bisexual leaning gay and mostly gay groups, likely the result of small sample size. Results suggest that romantic indicators are as good as sexual measures in assessing sexual orientation and that a succession of logically following groups from bisexual leaning gay, mostly gay, to gay. Whether these three groups are discrete or overlapping needs further research.

Keywords

Sexual orientation Bisexuality Gay Pupil dilation 

Notes

Funding

This research was funded by the American Institute of Bisexuality and the United States Department of Agriculture (NYC-321421).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aboyoun, D. C., & Dabbs, J. M. (1998). The Hess pupil dilation findings: Sex or novelty? Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attard-Johnson, J., Bindemann, M., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2016). Pupillary response as an age-specific measure of sexual interest: An exploratory study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 855–870. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0681-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (Vol. 54, pp. 43–63). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09556-1_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, J. M., Vasey, P. L., Diamond, L. D., Breedlove, S. M., Vilain, E., & Epprecht, M. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101. doi: 10.1177/1529100616637616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Calzo, J. P., Antonucci, T. C., Mays, V. M., & Cochran, S. D. (2011). Retrospective recall of sexual orientation identity development among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1658–1673. doi: 10.1037/a0025508.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., & Copen, C. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 20062008 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, No. 36, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3_4.
  8. Copen, C. E., Chandra, A., & Febo-Vazquez, I. (2016). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual orientation among adults aged 1844 in the United States: Data from the 20112013 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, No. 88, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  9. Feybesse, C., & Hatfield, E. (2016). The dark side of love: Brazil. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  10. Gangestad, S. W., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Taxometric analyses of sexual orientation and gender identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1109–1121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldinger, S. D., & Papesh, M. H. (2012). Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonsiorek, J. C., Sell, R. L., & Weinrich, J. D. (1995). Definition and measurement of sexual orientation. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25(S), 40–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, M., Roback, H., Tittler, B., Weitz, L., Walston, B., & McKee, E. (1978). Psychological adjustment of nonpatient homosexuals: Critical review of the research literature. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 39, 604–608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Haslam, N. (1997). Evidence that male sexual orientation is a matter of degree. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 862–870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1987). Passionate love/sexual desire: Can the same paradigm explain both? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 259–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2009). The neuropsychology of passionate love. In E. Cuyler & M. Ackhart (Eds.), Psychology of relationships (pp. 519–543). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  17. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349–350. doi: 10.2307/1706082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess, E. H., Seltzer, A. L., & Shlien, J. M. (1965). Pupil response of hetero- and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: A pilot study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 165–168. doi: 10.1037/h0021978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Horovitz, B. (2012). After Gen X, Millennials, what should next generation be? USA Today. Retrieved May 3, 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Jones, R. P., & Cox, D. (2010). Two decades of polling on gay and lesbian issues at Pew: An overview and assessment analysis. Washington, DC: Public Religion Research Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Karandashev, V., & Clapp, S. (2016). Psychometric properties and structures of passionate and companionate love. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10, 56–76. doi: 10.5964/ijpr.v10i1.210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Korchmaros, J. D., Powell, C., & Stevens, S. (2013). Chasing sexual orientation: A comparison of commonly used single-indicator measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 596–614. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.760324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. LeVay, S. (2016). Gay, straight, and the reason why: The science of sexual orientation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. McConaghy, N. (1987). Heterosexuality/homosexuality: Dichotomy or continuum. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 411–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McConaghy, N. (1999). Unresolved issues in scientific sexology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 285–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Norris, A. L., Marcus, D. K., & Green, B. A. (2015). Homosexuality as a discrete class. Psychological Science, 26, 1843–1853. doi: 10.1177/0956797615598617.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pega, F., Gray, A., Veale, J. F., Binson, D., & Sell, R. L. (2013). Toward global comparability of sexual orientation data in official statistics: A conceptual framework of sexual orientation for health data collection in New Zealand’s Official Statistics System. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 8, 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2013/473451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2015). Viewing time measures of sexual orientation in Samoan cisgender men who engage in sexual interactions with fa’fafine. PLoS One, 10(2), e0116529.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015). Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rieger, G., Rosenthal, A. M., Cash, B., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Bailey, J. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2013). Male bisexual arousal: A matter of curiosity? Biological Psychology, 94, 479–489. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One, 7, e40256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2014). An exploratory study of the categorical versus spectrum nature of sexual orientation. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 446–453. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0219-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2016). Becoming who I am: Young men on being gay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Savin-Williams, R. C. (in press). An exploratory study of exclusively heterosexual, primarily heterosexual, and mostly heterosexual young men. Sexualities.Google Scholar
  38. Savin-Williams, R. C., Joyner, K., & Rieger, G. (2012). Prevalence and stability of self-reported sexual orientation identity during young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 103–110. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9913-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Savin-Williams, R. C., Rieger, G., & Rosenthal, A. M. (2013). Physiological evidence for a mostly heterosexual orientation among men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 697–699. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0093-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013). Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Developmental Review, 33, 58–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sell, R. L. (1996). The Sell assessment of sexual orientation: Background and scoring. Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 1, 295–310.Google Scholar
  42. Shively, M. G., & DeCecco, J. P. (1977). Components of sexual identity. Journal of Homosexuality, 3, 41–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Wells, B. E. (2015). Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 2273–2285. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0540-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: Evidence for new sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 85–101. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9921-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Weinrich, J. D., Snyder, P. J., Pillard, R. C., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Renée Robinson, S., & McCutchan, J. A. (1993). A factor analysis of the Klein sexual orientation Grid in two disparate samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 157. doi: 10.1007/BF01542364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ritch C. Savin-Williams
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brian M. Cash
    • 1
  • Mark McCormack
    • 2
  • Gerulf Rieger
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human DevelopmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations