Skip to main content

Visual Attention Patterns of Women with Androphilic and Gynephilic Sexual Attractions

Abstract

Women who report exclusive sexual attractions to men (i.e., androphilia) exhibit gender-nonspecific patterns of sexual response—similar magnitude of genital response to both male and female targets. Interestingly, women reporting any degree of attraction to women (i.e., gynephilia) show significantly greater sexual responses to stimuli depicting female targets compared to male targets. At present, the mechanism(s) underlying these patterns are unknown. According to the information processing model (IPM), attentional processing of sexual cues initiates sexual responding; thus, attention to sexual cues may be one mechanism to explain the observed within-gender differences in specificity findings among women. The purpose of the present study was to examine patterns of initial and controlled visual attention among women with varying sexual attractions. We used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of 164 women who differed in their degree of androphilia and gynephilia. We found that both exclusively and predominantly androphilic women showed gender-nonspecific patterns of initial attention. In contrast, ambiphilic (i.e., concurrent androphilia and gynephilia) and predominantly/exclusively gynephilic women oriented more quickly toward female targets. Controlled attention patterns mirrored patterns of self-reported sexual attractions for three of these four groups of women, such that gender-specific patterns of visual attention were found for androphilic and gynephilic women. Ambiphilic women looked significantly longer at female targets compared to male targets. These findings support predictions from the IPM and suggest that both initial and controlled attention to sexual cues may be mechanisms contributing to within-gender variation in sexual responding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 347–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, K. N., Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Gender-specificity of genital response and self-reported sexual arousal in women endorsing facets of bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 180–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buodo, G., Sarlo, M., & Palomba, D. (2002). Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F., & Szymanski, M. L. (1995). The development and validation of the Body-Image Ideals Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 466–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L. (2005). A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L. (2010). A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). A sex difference in features that elicit genital response. Biological Psychology, 70, 115–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Bouchard, K. N., & Timmers, A. D. (2015). Straight but not narrow: Within-gender variation in the gender-specificity of women’s sexual response. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., & Timmers, A. D. (2012). Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 185–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014). Gender-specificity of solitary and dyadic sexual desire among gynephilic and androphilic women and men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 980–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2016). Gender-specificity of initial and controlled visual attention to sexual stimuli in androphilic women and gynephilic men. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. J., Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Sexual fantasies and viewing times across the menstrual cycle: A diary study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 173–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitte, M. (2016). Gender differences in implicit processing of sexual stimuli. European Journal of Personality, 30, 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M., & Wallen, K. (2011). Sexual minority women’s sexual motivation around the time of ovulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 237–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., White, L. A., Byrne, D., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, A., Mulhern, G., & Sawey, M. (2008). Confounds in pictorial sets: The role of complexity and familiarity in basic-level picture processing. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 116–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 57, 100–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K., & Watson, R. J. (1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 3, 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heaver, B., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory, 19, 398–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herbenick, D., & Reece, M. (2010). Development and validation of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 1822–1830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, J. S., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Examining gender specificity of sexual response with concurrent thermography and plethysmography. Psychophysiology, 52, 1382–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, J. S., Maracle, A. C., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Gender-specificity of women’s and men’s self-reported attention to sexual stimuli. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 983–995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, R., Schmidt, A. F., Weiß, S., Young, A. W., & Banse, R. (2012). Vicarious viewing time: Prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task-or stimulus-specific processing. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1389–1401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 551–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2012). Effects of sex and sexual orientation on self-reported attraction and viewing times to images of men and women: Testing for category specificity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 149–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2013). Men and women with bisexual identities show bisexual patterns of sexual attraction to male and female “swimsuit models.” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 187–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A., Patterson, T. M., & Marelich, W. D. (2010). Looking at and longing for male and female “swimsuit models” men are much more category specific than women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 238–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007a). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007b). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 74–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Garner, M., & Bradley, B. P. (2007). Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces. Biological Psychology, 76, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Millar, N., & Bradley, B. P. (2000). Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 695–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Santtila, P., & Hyönä, J. (2012). Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1439–1451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, B. O., Cisler, J. M., Deacon, B. J., Connolly, K., & Lohr, J. M. (2007). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 918–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., Janssen, E., & Laan, E. (2010). Women’s sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: The role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 880–897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponseti, J., & Bosinski, H. A. (2010). Subliminal sexual stimuli facilitate genital response in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1073–1079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015). Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Savin-Williams, R. C., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2016). Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 265–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, M., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F., Hunter, J., Exner, T. M., Gwadz, M., & Keller, A. M. (1996). The psychosexual development of urban lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C., Brown, J., Heiman, S., Leiblum, C., Meston, R., Shabsigh, D., … D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 135–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rullo, J. E., Kinnish, K., & Strassberg, D. S. (2006). Sex differences in the specificity of sexual behavior, fantasy, and romantic attraction. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Miner, M. H. (2015). Gender-specificity in sexual interest in bisexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1449–1457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2009). Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 417–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (1990). Gay and lesbian youth: Expressions of identity. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, R. J., & Gray, N. S. (2013). Implicit sexual associations in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 475–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, R. J., Wichter, J., & Gray, N. S. (2008). Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: A comparison of priming techniques and the implicit association task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 558–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22, 175–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M., & Everaerd, W. (2007). The sexual unconscious. In E. Janssen (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 166–184). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Janssen, E. (2003). Priming the sexual system: Implicit versus explicit activation. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 134–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., Karsdorp, P., Both, S., & Brauer, M. (2006). Nonconscious processing of sexual information: A generalization to women. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 268–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1092–1097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, D. L., Wincze, J. P., Barlow, D. H., & Mavissakalian, M. (1981). A comparison of male and female patterns of sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10, 529–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2009). Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: Measurement artifacts or true phenomena? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 559–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, D., Safron, A., Rosenthal, A. M., Reber, P. J., Parrish, T. B., & Bailey, J. M. (2013). Neural correlates of sexual arousal in heterosexual and homosexual women and men. Hormones and Behavior, 64, 673–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. M., & Morgan, E. M. (2008). “Mostly straight” young women: Variations in sexual behavior and identity development. Developmental Psychology, 44, 15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, A. D., Bouchard, K. N., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Effects of gender and sexual activity cues on the sexual responses of women with multidimensionally defined bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 154–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 168–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, C. D., Adams, H. E., & Tollison, J. W. (1979). Cognitive and physiological indices of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual males. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toothaker, L. E. (1991). Multiple comparisons for researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: Evidence for new sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 85–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlaff, F., Briken, P., & Dekker, A. (2015). Video-based eye tracking in sex research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1107524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wincze, J. P., & Qualls, C. B. (1984). A comparison of structural patterns of sexual arousal in male and female homosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 361–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a grant from the American Institute of Bisexuality awarded to M. L. Chivers and an Ontario Trillium Scholarship awarded to S. J. Dawson. The authors would like to thank Katrina Bouchard, Jackie Huberman, and Kelly Suschinsky for their thoughtful suggestions on an earlier version of this article. This paper was presented at the annual meetings of the International Academy of Sex Research in Toronto, ON, Canada, August 2015, and Canadian Sex Research Forum, Kelowna, BC, Canada, September 2015, as well as the quinquennial meeting of the Puzzle of Sexual Orientation Workshop in Lethbridge, AB, Canada, July 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith L. Chivers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Samantha J. Dawson, Katherine M. Fretz, and Meredith L. Chivers declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures were approved under the General Research Ethics Board at Queen’s University.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawson, S.J., Fretz, K.M. & Chivers, M.L. Visual Attention Patterns of Women with Androphilic and Gynephilic Sexual Attractions. Arch Sex Behav 46, 141–153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0

Keywords

  • Gender specificity
  • Eye tracking
  • Visual attention
  • Information processing model
  • Sexual orientation
  • Sexual arousal