Predictors of Sexual Aggression Victimization and Perpetration Among Polish University Students: A Longitudinal Study
This two-wave study investigated predictors of sexual aggression victimization and perpetration in a convenience sample of 318 Polish university students (214 women), considering males and females from the perspective of both victims and perpetrators. At T1, we assessed participants’ risky sexual scripts (defined as cognitive representations of consensual sexual interactions containing elements related to sexual aggression), risky sexual behavior, pornography use, religiosity, sexual self-esteem, and attitudes toward sexual coercion. These variables were used to predict sexual aggression perpetration and victimization reports obtained 12 months later (T2) for two time windows: (a) since the age of 15 until a year ago and (b) in the past year. As expected, risky sexual scripts were linked to risky sexual behavior and indirectly increased the likelihood of victimization in both time windows. Lower sexual self-esteem predicted sexual victimization since age 15, but not in the past 12 months. Pornography use and religiosity indirectly predicted victimization via risky scripts and behavior. Attitudes toward sexual coercion were a prospective predictor of sexual aggression perpetration. The results extend the international literature on sexual aggression and have implications for sexual education and sexual aggression prevention programs.
KeywordsYouth sexual aggression Sexual scripts Pornography Religiosity Poland
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Zbigniew Izdebski.
- Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271–303. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC. (2004). Sexual violence prevention: Beginning the dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/svprevention-a.pdf.
- Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals and rape. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., Johnson, P. B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault (Vol. II, pp. 245–270). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Gruszczyńska, B. (2007). Przemoc wobec kobiet. Aspekty prawnokryminologiczne [Violence against women. Legal and criminological aspects]. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Press.Google Scholar
- Hald, G. M., Seaman, C., & Linz, D. (2014). Sexuality and pornography. In D. Tolman, L. Diamond, J. Bauermeister, W. George, J. Pfaus, & M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, Vol. 2: Contextual approaches (pp. 3–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huesmann, L. R. (1998). The role of information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research and implications for social policy (pp. 73–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Izdebski, Z. (2012). Seksualność Polaków na początku XXI wieku. Studium badawcze [Poles’ sexuality in the early twenty-first century. A research study]. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press.Google Scholar
- Krahé, B., Berger, A., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Bianchi, G., Chliaoutakis, J., Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., … Hellemans, S. (2015). Prevalence and correlates of youth sexual aggression and victimization in 10 European countries: A multilevel analysis. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17, 682–699. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.989265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuyper, L., de Wit, J., Smolenski, D., Adam, P., Woertman, L., & van Berlo, W. (2013). Gender differences in patterns of experienced sexual coercion and associated vulnerability factors among young people in the Netherlands. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 3149–3170. doi: 10.1177/0886260513488689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Machaj, A., Roszak, M., & Stankowska, I. (2010). Ryzykowne zachowania seksualne kobiet w okresie prokreacyjnym [Risky sexual behaviors of women of reproductive age]. Nowiny Lekarskie, 79, 22–31.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/HTML_UG/introV8.htm.
- Tomaszewska, P., & Krahé, B. (2015). Sexual aggression victimization and perpetration among female and male university students in Poland. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260515609583.
- Wright, P. J. (2011). Mass media effects on youth sexual behavior: Assessing the claim for causality. Communication Yearbook, 35, 343–386.Google Scholar