Abstract
Pupil dilation to explicit sexual stimuli (footage of naked and aroused men or women) can elicit sex and sexual orientation differences in sexual response. If similar patterns were replicated with non-explicit sexual stimuli (footage of dressed men and women), then pupil dilation could be indicative of automatic sexual response in fully noninvasive designs. We examined this in 325 men and women with varied sexual orientations to determine whether dilation patterns to non-explicit sexual stimuli resembled those to explicit sexual stimuli depicting the same sex or other sex. Sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation to non-explicit sexual stimuli mirrored those to explicit sexual stimuli. However, the relationship of dilation to non-explicit sexual stimuli with dilation to corresponding explicit sexual stimuli was modest, and effect magnitudes were smaller with non-explicit sexual stimuli than explicit sexual stimuli. The prediction that sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation are larger in men than in women was confirmed with explicit sexual stimuli but not with non-explicit sexual stimuli.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboyoun, D. C., & Dabbs, J. N. (1998). The Hess pupil dilation findings: Sex or novelty? Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 415–419. doi:10.2224/sbp.1998.26.4.415.
Attard-Johnson, J., Bindemann, M., & Ó Ciardha, C. (2016). Pupillary response as an age-specific measure of sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 855–870. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0681-3.
Bailey, J. M. (2009). What is sexual orientation and do women have one? In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (Vol. 54, pp. 43–63). New York: Springer.
Bailey, J. M., Rieger, G., & Rosenthal, A. (2011). Still in search of bisexual sexual arousal: Comment on Cerny and Janssen (2011). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1293–1295. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9778-5.
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., & Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, 602–607. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x.
Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E. M., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x.
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108.
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9.
Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 161–172. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9923-9.
Friedman, M. S., Silvestre, A. J., Gold, M. A., Markovic, N., Savin-Williams, R. C., Huggins, J., & Sell, R. L. (2004). Adolescents define sexual orientation and suggest ways to measure it. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 303–317. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.006.
Goldinger, S. D., & Papesh, M. H. (2012). Pupil dilation reflects the creation and retrieval of memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 90–95. doi:10.1177/0963721412436811.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502–511. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.502.
Heaver, B., & Hutton, S. B. (2011). Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory, 19, 398–405. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.575788.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
Herek, G. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1, 6–24. doi:10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6.
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349–350. doi:10.2307/1706082.
Hess, E. H., Seltzer, A. L., & Shlien, J. M. (1965). Pupil response of hetero- and homosexual males to pictures of men and women: A pilot study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 165–168. doi:10.1037/h0021978.
Huberman, J. S., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Examining gender-specificity of sexual response with concurrent thermography and plethysmography. Psychophysiology, 52, 1382–1395. doi:10.1111/psyp.12466.
Janssen, E., Prause, N., & Geer, J. H. (2007). The sexual response. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 245–266). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, M. H. (1995). The inhibition of automatic saccades in early infancy. Developmental Psychobiology, 28, 281–291. doi:10.1002/dev.420280504.
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Korchmaros, J. D., Powell, C., & Stevens, S. (2013). Chasing sexual orientation: A comparison of commonly used single-indicator measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 60, 596–614. doi:10.1080/00918369.2013.760324.
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2012). Pupillometry. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 18–27. doi:10.1177/1745691611427305.
Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84, 437–450. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007.
Lippa, R. A. (2012). Effects of sex and sexual orientation on self-reported attraction and viewing times to images of men and women: Testing for category specificity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 149–160. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9898-y.
Lykins, A., Meana, M., & Kambe, G. (2006). Detection of differential viewing patterns to erotic and non-erotic stimuli using eye-tracking methodology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 569–575. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9065-z.
Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 219–228. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x.
McConaghy, N. (1999). Unresolved issues in scientific sexology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 285–318. doi:10.1023/A:1018744628161.
Mirandé, A. (2015). Hombres mujeres: An indigenous third gender. Men and Masculinities. doi:10.1177/1097184X15602746.
Mishra, S., Clark, A., & Daly, M. (2007). One woman’s behavior affects the attractiveness of others. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 145–149. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.11.001.
Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Review Neuroscience, 5, 218–228. doi:10.1038/nrn1345.
Nanda, S. (1986). The Hijras of India. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–54. doi:10.1300/J082v11n03_03.
Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2015). Viewing time measures of sexual orientation in Samoan cisgender men who engage in sexual interactions with fa’afafine. PLoS One, 10, e0116529. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116529.
Petterson, L. J., Dixson, B. J., Little, A. C., & Vasey, P. L. (2016). Reconsidering male bisexuality: Sexual activity role and sexual attraction in Samoan men who engage in sexual interactions with fa’afafine. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3, 11–26. doi:10.1037/sgd0000160.
Ragins, B. R., Singh, R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1103–1118. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1103.
Rahman, Q., & Wilson, G. D. (2003). Born gay? The psychobiology of human sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1337–1382. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00140-X.
Rieger, G., Cash, B. M., Merrill, S. M., Jones-Rounds, J., Dharmavaram, S. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2015a). Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biological Psychology, 104, 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.009.
Rieger, G., Gygax, L., Linsenmeier, J., Siler-Knogl, A., Moskowitz, D., & Bailey, J. M. (2011). Sex typicality and attractiveness in childhood and adulthood: Assessing their relationships from videos. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 143–154. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9512-8.
Rieger, G., Rosenthal, A. M., Cash, B. M., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Bailey, J. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2013). Male bisexual arousal: A matter of curiosity? Biological Psychology, 94, 479–489. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.007.
Rieger, G., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2012). The eyes have it: Sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS One, 7, e40256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040256.
Rieger, G., Savin-Williams, R. C., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2015b). Sexual arousal and masculinity-femininity of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/pspp0000077.
Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 135–147. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9881-7.
Savin-Williams, R. C. (2016). Gay teens: Boys to men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Savin-Williams, R. C., Rieger, G., & Rosenthal, A. M. (2013). Physiological evidence for a mostly heterosexual orientation among men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 697–699. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0093-1.
Sell, R. L. (1997). Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 643–658. doi:10.1023/A:1024528427013.
Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12, 319–327. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.319.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Strassberg, D. S., & Lowe, K. (1995). Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 369–382. doi:10.1007/bf01541853.
Suschinsky, K. D., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Prepared for anything? An investigation of female genital arousal in response to rape cues. Psychological Science, 22, 159–165. doi:10.1177/0956797610394660.
ten Donkelaar, H. J., Němcová, V., Lammens, M., Overeem, S., & Keyser, A. (2011). The autonomic nervous system. Clinical Neuroanatomy. doi:10.1007/1978-1003-1642-19134-19133_19112.
Wolchik, S. A., Spencer, S. L., & Lisi, I. S. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 399–408. doi:10.1007/bf01542883.
Young, A. (2000). Women who become men: Albanian sworn virgins. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Funding
This research was funded by the American Institute of Bisexuality and the United States Department of Agriculture (NYC-321421).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Tuesday M. Watts, Luke Holmes, Ritch C. Savin Williams, and Gerulf Rieger declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watts, T.M., Holmes, L., Savin-Williams, R.C. et al. Pupil Dilation to Explicit and Non-Explicit Sexual Stimuli. Arch Sex Behav 46, 155–165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0801-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0801-8


