Perceptions of Sexual Orientation From Minimal Cues
- 1k Downloads
People derive considerable amounts of information about each other from minimal nonverbal cues. Apart from characteristics typically regarded as obvious when encountering another person (e.g., age, race, and sex), perceivers can identify many other qualities about a person that are typically rather subtle. One such feature is sexual orientation. Here, I review the literature documenting the accurate perception of sexual orientation from nonverbal cues related to one’s adornment, acoustics, actions, and appearance. In addition to chronicling studies that have demonstrated how people express and extract sexual orientation in each of these domains, I discuss some of the basic cognitive and perceptual processes that support these judgments, including how cues to sexual orientation manifest in behavioral (e.g., clothing choices) and structural (e.g., facial morphology) signals. Finally, I attend to boundary conditions in the accurate perception of sexual orientation, such as the states, traits, and group memberships that moderate individuals’ ability to reliably decipher others’ sexual orientation.
KeywordsAppearance Behavior Clothing Gaydar Sexual orientation Social psychology Voices
The author has received research grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
- Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. (2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Bargh, J. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In J. R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, culture, and the making of the gay male world 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Crist, S. (1997). Duration of onset consonants in gay male stereotyped speech. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 53–70.Google Scholar
- David, L., Seinfeld, J., Charles, L., Mehlman, P., & Cherones, T. (1993). The outing. In J. Seinfeld (Ed.), Seinfeld. Los Angeles, CA: National Broadcasting Company.Google Scholar
- Hallahan, M. (1998). Reanalysis of Berger, Hank, Rauzi, & Simkins, 1987. Unpublished manuscript, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.Google Scholar
- Khan, N., Huang, E., Smithyman, D., & Scanlon, C. (2015). The blind spot. In R. Blomquist, E. Huang, & J. McEwen (Eds.), Fresh off the boat. New York: American Broadcast Company.Google Scholar
- Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2014). Perceptual roots of anti-gay prejudice: Negative evaluations of targets perceived to be lesbian/gay arise early in person perception on the basis of gender atypical visual cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1178–1192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 428–463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McKenna, N. (2003). The secret life of Oscar Wilde. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Netter, F. H. (2003). Atlas of human anatomy (3rd ed.). Teterboro, NJ: Icon Learning Systems.Google Scholar
- Re, D. E., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Appearance and physiognomy. In D. Matsumoto, H. Hwang, & M. Frank (Eds.), APA handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 221–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Rinn, W. E. (1991). Neuropsychology of facial expression. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 3–30). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rule, N. O., Bjornsdottir, R. T., Tskhay, K. O., & Ambady, N. (2016a). Subtle perceptions of male sexual orientation influence occupational opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology.Google Scholar
- Rule, N. O., Johnson, K. L., & Freeman, J. B. (2016b). Evidence for the absence of stimulus quality differences in tests of the accuracy of sexual orientation judgments: A reply to Cox, Devine, Bischmann, and Hyde (2016). Journal of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1205547.
- Smigel, R., & Smedelmaier, J. J. (1996). The ambiguously gay duo. New York: National Broadcast Company.Google Scholar
- Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2015b). Internalized homophobia influences perceptions of men’s sexual orientation from photos of their faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0628-8
- Ulrichs, K. H. (1997). Araxes (J. Steakley, Trans.). In M. Blasius & S. Phelan (Eds.), We are everywhere: A historical sourcebook of gay and lesbian politics (pp. 63–65) New York: Routledge. (Original work published 1870)Google Scholar