Topography of Human Erogenous Zones

Abstract

Touching is a powerful means for eliciting sexual arousal. Here, we establish the topographical organization of bodily regions triggering sexual arousal in humans. A total of 704 participants were shown images of same and opposite sex bodies and asked to color the bodily regions whose touching they or members of the opposite sex would experience as sexually arousing while masturbating or having sex with a partner. Resulting erogenous zone maps (EZMs) revealed that the whole body was sensitive to sexual touching, with erogenous hotspots consisting of genitals, breasts, and anus. The EZM area was larger while having sex with a partner versus while masturbating, and was also dependent on sexual desire and heterosexual and homosexual interest levels. We conclude that tactile stimulation of practically all bodily regions may trigger sexual arousal. Extension of the erogenous zones while having sex with a partner may reflect the role of touching in maintenance of reproductive pair bonds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. 1.

    A trivial explanation for these results is that while masturbating an individual cannot touch all of their back. However, the overall pattern of results remains essentially unchanged even when only the ventral surface of the body is considered.

  2. 2.

    These maps reflect participants’ evaluation of tactile and nociceptive sensitivity, rather than true sensory thresholds. However, the maps shown in Fig. 4 agree in general well with prior studies using sparse spatial sampling of tactile sensitivity (Ackerley, Carlsson, Wester, Olausson, & Backlund Wasling, 2014; Mancini et al., 2014).

References

  1. Ackerley, R., Carlsson, I., Wester, H., Olausson, H., & Backlund Wasling, H. (2014). Touch perceptions across skin sites: Differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 54. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition–ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults—A test of a 4-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (2000). Why can’t you tickle yourself? NeuroReport, 11, R11–R16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumiere, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dean, R. C., & Lue, T. F. (2005). Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. Urologic Clinics of North America, 32, 379–395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Derogatis, L. R. (1978). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. Jourrnal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 5, 244–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fillingim, R. B., & Maixner, W. (1995). Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli. Pain Forum, 4, 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georgiadis, J. R., Kortekaas, R., Kuipers, R., Nieuwenburg, A., Pruim, J., Reinders, A. A., & Holstege, G. (2006). Regional cerebral blood flow changes associated with clitorally induced orgasm in healthy women. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3305–3316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Georgiadis, J. R., Reinders, A., Paans, A. M. J., Renken, R., & Kortekaas, R. (2009). Men versus women on sexual brain function: Prominent differences during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3089–3101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Hall, K. L., Hoffman, K. E., & Verrillo, R. T. (1994). The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch 1. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 11, 345–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 5–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hietanen, J. K., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Nummenmaa, L. (in press). Bodily maps of emotions across child development. Developmental Science. doi:10.1111/desc.12389.

  16. Hubscher, C. H., & Johnson, R. D. (2003). Responses of thalamic neurons to input from the male genitalia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 2–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurlbert, D. F., Apt, C., Hurlbert, M. K., & Pierce, A. P. (2000). Sexual compatibility and the sexual desire-motivation relation in females with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Behavior Modification, 24, 325–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen, E. (2011). Sexual arousal in men: A review and conceptual analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 59, 708–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, S. E., & Yarbrough, A. E. (1985). A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication Monographs, 52, 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelly, M. P., Strassberg, D. S., & Turner, C. M. (2006). Behavioral assessment of couples’ communication in female orgasmic disorder. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32, 81–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Komisaruk, B. R., & Whipple, B. (2005). Functional MRI of the brain during orgasm in women. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 62–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, 372–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levin, R., & Meston, C. (2006). Nipple/breast stimulation and sexual arousal in young men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3, 450–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lippa, R. A. (2006). Is high sex drive associated with increased sexual attraction to both sexes? It depends on whether you are male or female. Psychological Science, 17, 46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, Q., Vrontou, S., Rice, F. L., Zylka, M. J., Dong, X., & Anderson, D. J. (2007). Molecular genetic visualization of a rare subset of unmyelinated sensory neurons that may detect gentle touch. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 946–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Loken, L. S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., & Olausson, H. (2009). Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 547–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mancini, F., Bauleo, A., Cole, J., Lui, F., Porro, C. A., Haggard, P., & Iannetti, G. D. (2014). Whole-body mapping of spatial acuity for pain and touch. Annals of Neurology, 75, 917–924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin-Alguacil, N., Schober, J., Kow, L.-M., & Pfaff, D. (2006). Arousing properties of the vulvar epithelium. Journal of Urology, 176, 456–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 646–651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Olausson, H., Lamarre, Y., Backlund, H., Morin, C., Wallin, B. G., Starck, G., & Bushnell, M. C. (2002). Unmyelinated tactile afferents signal touch and project to insular cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 900–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 60, 389–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Purnine, D. M., & Carey, M. P. (1997). Interpersonal communication and sexual adjustment: The roles of understanding and agreement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1017–1025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ruben, J., Schwiemann, J., Deuchert, M., Meyer, R., Krause, T., Curio, G., … Villringer, A. (2001). Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 463–473.

  35. Schober, J. M., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Dolezal, C. (2009). Self-ratings of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in men using the Self-Assessment of Genital Anatomy and Sexual Function, Male questionnaire. BJU International, 103, 1096–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sell, R. L. (1996). The Sell assessment of sexual orientation: Background and scoring. Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 1, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steers, W. D. (2000). Neural pathways and central sites involved in penile erection neuroanatomy and clinical implications. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 507–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Suvilehto, J., Glerean, E., Dunbar, R. I. M., Hari, R., & Nummenmaa, L. (2015). Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 13811–13816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Turnbull, O. H., Lovett, V. E., Chaldecott, J., & Lucas, M. D. (2014). Reports of intimate touch: Erogenous zones and somatosensory cortical organization. Cortex, 53, 146–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Walen, S. R., & Roth, D. (1987). A cognitive approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 335–362). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Willis, F, Jr, & Briggs, L. (1992). Relationship and touch in public settings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Academy of Finland (MIND Program Grants #265915 to LN and #266187 to JKH).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauri Nummenmaa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1045 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nummenmaa, L., Suvilehto, J.T., Glerean, E. et al. Topography of Human Erogenous Zones. Arch Sex Behav 45, 1207–1216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0745-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Somatosensation
  • Arousal
  • Sexuality
  • Touch
  • Bonding