Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 491–493 | Cite as

The Rainbow Becomes a Spectrum

  • Meredith L. ChiversEmail author
Commentary on van Anders (2015)

Sexual orientation research has reached a crossroads as the very concept of what is a “sexual orientation” is being questioned (Vasey & Lalumière, 2012). At the Puzzle of Sexual Orientation workshop in 2010 (a group of sexuality scholars meeting every 5 years for the past 20 years), the definition of sexual orientation broadened to include multiple other dimensions, including age, sexual activity preferences, and asexuality, among others. As for the substrate of sexual orientation, what is being “oriented” (Diamond, 2003), toward what, and how, we collectively engaged the problem of how components of sexual orientations fit together, the dimensions upon which sexuality could and did vary, and how we could begin to renovate the construct of sexual orientation to better fit the totality of variation in human sexuality. What was lacking, I believe, was a framework to begin organizing these concepts. Enter van Anders’ (2015) Sexual Configurations Theory (SCT).

Admittedly, my first read of...

Keywords

Sexual Orientation Sexual Attraction Sexual Expression Sexual Response Pedophilia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blanchard, R., Lykins, A. D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M. E., Cantor, J. M., Blak, T., … Klassen, P. E. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335–350.Google Scholar
  2. Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Diamond, L. M. (2005). “I’m straight, but I kissed a girl”: The trouble with American media representations of female-female sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 104–110. doi: 10.1177/0959353505049712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farr, R. H., Diamond, L. M., & Boker, S. M. (2014). Female same-sex sexuality from a dynamical systems perspective: Sexual desire, motivation, and behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1477–1490. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hollenstein, T., & Lanteigne, D. (2014). Models and methods of emotional concordance. Biological Psychology, 98, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.12.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lalumiere, M. L. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lawrence, A. A. (2009). Erotic target location errors: An underappreciated paraphilic dimension. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 194–215. doi: 10.1080/00224490902747727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vasey, P. L., & Lalumière, M. L. (2012). Introduction to the special section “The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation: What Is It and How Does It Work?” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 11–12. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9932-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations