The evaluation of gender nonconformity in children was examined in two studies. In Study 1, 48 young adults evaluated the positivity of culturally popular labels for gender nonconformity, including “tomboy,” “sissy,” and two new labels generated in a pilot study, “mama’s boy” and “brat.” The “mama’s boy” was described as a boy who has positive feminine traits (gentle and well-mannered) as opposed to the “sissy” who was described as having negative feminine traits (crying and easily frightened). In Study 2, 161 young adults read descriptions of gender-typical and nonconforming children, evaluating them in several domains. The label “mama’s boy” was considered negative in Study 1 but an unlabeled positive nonconforming boy was rated as likable and competent in Study 2. However, participants worried about nonconforming boys, saying they would encourage them to behave differently and describing such children with derogatory sexual orientation slurs. “Tomboy” was generally considered a positive label in Study 1. In Study 2, gender nonconforming girls were considered neither likable nor dislikeable, and neither competent nor incompetent, reflecting ambivalence about girls’ nonconformity. It may be that we use gender nonconformity labels as indicators of sexual orientation, even in young children. Therefore, even when an individual displays objectively positive traits, the stigma associated with homosexuality taints judgments about their nonconforming behavior.
Gender nonconformity Sissy Tomboy Gender attitudes Sexual orientation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We would like to acknowledge the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship program, which supports the first author (Grant No. DGE1255832). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We additionally gratefully acknowledge support from the Lenfest Grant, which supports the second author.
Ahlqvist, S., Halim, M. L., Greulich, F. K., Lurye, L. E., & Ruble, D. (2013). The potential benefits and risks of identifying as a tomboy: A social identity perspective. Self and Identity,12, 563–581. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.717709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D. B., & McCloskey, L. A. (1983–1984). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behaviors: The development of children’s conceptions of cross gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition,2, 294–314. doi:10.1521/soco.19188.8.131.524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, J., Arnold, D. H., & Doctoroff, G. L. (2004). Attention in the preschool classroom: The relationships among child gender, child misbehavior, and types of teacher attention. Early Child Development and Care,174, 281–295. doi:10.1080/0300443032000153598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, B. I., & Patterson, G. R. (1969). An in vivo analysis of reinforcing contingencies for sex-role behaviors in the preschool child. Developmental Psychology,1, 563–568. doi:10.1037/h0027965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R., Williams, K., & Goodman, M. (1982). Ninety-nine “tomboys” and “non-tomboys”: Behavioral contrasts and demographic similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior,11, 247–266. doi:10.1007/BF01544993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Sirin, S. R., McCreary, D. R., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men’s Studies,12, 119–132. doi:10.3149/jms.1202.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. G. (1986). Preschool children’s conceptions of sex-role transgressions. Child Development,57, 862–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somaiya, R. (2015, June 1). Caitlyn Jenner, formerly Bruce, introduces herself in Vanity Fair. New York Times. Retrieved: http://www.nytimes.com.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Vyktoriah, K. (2013, August 2). What happened when my son wore a pink headband to Walmart. Huffington Post: Parents. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com.
Wallien, M. C., Veenstra, R., Kreukels, B. P. C., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2010). Peer group status of gender dysphoric children: A sociometric study. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 533–560. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9517-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, K. J., Mitchell, J. N., Bradley, S. J., Tkachuk, J., Cantor, J. M., & Allin, S. M. (2006). The Recalled Childhood Gender Identity/Gender Role questionnaire: Psychometric properties. Sex Roles,54, 469–483. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9019-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, K. J., Wilson-Smith, D. N., Kurita, J. A., & Stern, A. (1995). Children’s appraisals of sex-typed behaviors in their peers. Sex Roles,33, 703–725. doi:10.1007/BF01544775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar