Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 925–936 | Cite as

Changing Places and Partners: Associations of Neighborhood Conditions With Sexual Network Turnover Among African American Adults Relocated From Public Housing

  • Sabriya L. LintonEmail author
  • Hannah L. F. Cooper
  • Ruiyan Luo
  • Conny Karnes
  • Kristen Renneker
  • Danielle F. Haley
  • Emily F. Dauria
  • Josalin Hunter-Jones
  • Zev Ross
  • Gina M. Wingood
  • Adaora A. Adimora
  • Loida Bonney
  • Richard Rothenberg
Original Paper

Abstract

Neighborhood conditions and sexual network turnover have been associated with the acquisition of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, few studies investigate the influence of neighborhood conditions on sexual network turnover. This longitudinal study used data collected across 7 visits from a predominantly substance-misusing cohort of 172 African American adults relocated from public housing in Atlanta, Georgia, to determine whether post-relocation changes in exposure to neighborhood conditions influence sexual network stability, the number of new partners joining sexual networks, and the number of partners leaving sexual networks over time. At each visit, participant and sexual network characteristics were captured via survey, and administrative data were analyzed to describe the census tracts where participants lived. Multilevel models were used to longitudinally assess the relationships of tract-level characteristics to sexual network dynamics over time. On average, participants relocated to neighborhoods that were less economically deprived and violent, and had lower alcohol outlet densities. Post-relocation reductions in exposure to alcohol outlet density were associated with fewer new partners joining sexual networks. Reduced perceived community violence was associated with more sexual partners leaving sexual networks. These associations were marginally significant. No post-relocation changes in place characteristics were significantly associated with overall sexual network stability. Neighborhood social context may influence sexual network turnover. To increase understanding of the social–ecological determinants of HIV/STIs, a new line of research should investigate the combined influence of neighborhood conditions and sexual network dynamics on HIV/STI transmission over time.

Keywords

Sexual networks HIV/STIs Neighborhoods Longitudinal analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by two grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health (R21DA027072 & R01DA029513), and a grant from the Emory University Center for AIDS research (P30 AI050409). RR was supported by The Georgia State Center of Excellence on Health Disparities (P20MD004806). DFH was partly funded by the Robert W. Woodruff pre-doctoral fellowship of the Emory University Laney Graduate School and a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health at the National Institutes of Health (F31MH105238). Support for EFD was provided by 2T32-MH078788. The authors thank the study participants for sharing their time and insight.

References

  1. Adimora, A. A., & Schoenbach, V. J. (2005). Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 191(Suppl. 1), S115–S122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Bonas, D. M., Martinson, F. E., Donaldson, K. H., & Stancil, T. R. (2002). Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass), 13, 320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adimora, A. A., Schoenbach, V. J., Taylor, E. M., Khan, M. R., Schwartz, R. J., & Miller, W. C. (2013). Sex ratio, poverty, and concurrent partnerships among men and women in the United States: A multilevel analysis. Annals of Epidemiology, 23, 716–719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander, J., Rose, J., Dierker, L., Chan, P. A., MacCarthy, S., Simmons, D., … Nunn, A. (2015). It is complicated: Sexual partner characteristic profiles and sexually transmitted infection rates within a predominantly African American population in Mississippi. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 42, 266–271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1988). Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature, 333, 514–519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Aral, S. O., Hughes, J. P., Stoner, B., Whittington, W., Handsfield, H. H., Anderson, R. M., & Holmes, K. K. (1999). Sexual mixing patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial infections. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 825–833.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Baral, S., Logie, C., Grosso, A., Wirtz, A., & Beyrer, C. (2013). Modified social ecological model: A tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health, 13, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. A., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Scribner, R., Miu, A., Scott, M., Robinson, P., … Brown-Taylor, D. (2006). Alcohol outlets, gonorrhea, and the Los Angeles civil unrest: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 3062–3071.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, H. L., Caruso, B., Barham, T., Embry, V., Dauria, E., Clark, C. D., & Comfort, M. L. (2015). Partner incarceration and African American women’s sexual relationships and risk: A longitudinal qualitative study. Journal of Urban Health, 92, 527–547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, H. L., Haley, D. F., Linton, S., Hunter-Jones, J., Martin, M., Kelley, M. E., … Bonney, L. E. (2014a). Impact of public housing relocations: Are changes in neighborhood conditions related to STIs among relocaters? Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 41, 573–579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, H. L., Linton, S., Haley, D. F., Kelley, M. E., Dauria, E. F., Karnes, C. C., … Adimora, A. (2014b). Changes in exposure to neighborhood characteristics are associated with sexual network characteristics in a cohort of adults relocating from public housing. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 1016–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curley, A. M. (2009). Draining or gaining? The social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauria, E. F., Elifson, K., Arriola, K. J., Wingood, G., & Cooper, H. L. (2015). Male incarceration rates and rates of sexually transmitted infections: Results from a longitudinal analysis in a southeastern US city. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 42, 324–328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. De, P., Singh, A. E., Wong, T., Yacoub, W., & Jolly, A. M. (2004). Sexual network analysis of a gonorrhoea outbreak. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, 280–285.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fichtenberg, C., Jennings, J., Glass, T., & Ellen, J. (2010). Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and sexual network position. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 225–235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd, L. J., & Brown, Q. (2013). Attitudes toward and sexual partnerships with drug dealers among young adult African American females in socially disorganized communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 43, 154–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Foxman, B., Newman, M., Percha, B., Holmes, K. K., & Aral, S. O. (2006). Measures of sexual partnerships: Lengths, gaps, overlaps, and sexually transmitted infection. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 33, 209–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, S. R., Cooper, H. L., & Osborne, A. H. (2009). Structural and social contexts of HIV risk among African Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1002–1008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorbach, P. M., Stoner, B. P., Aral, S. O., Whittington, W. L., & Holmes, K. K. (2002). “It takes a village”: Understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 453–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Jennings, J. M., Polk, S., Fichtenberg, C., Chung, S., & Ellen, J. M. (2015). Social place as a location of potential core transmitters—Implications for the targeted control of sexually transmitted disease transmission in urban areas. Annals of Epidemiology, 25, 861–867.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jennings, J. M., Taylor, R. B., Salhi, R. A., Furr-Holden, C. D. M., & Ellen, J. M. (2012). Neighborhood drug markets: A risk environment for bacterial sexually transmitted infections among urban youth. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 1240–1250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings, J. M., Woods, S. E., & Curriero, F. C. (2013). The spatial and temporal association of neighborhood drug markets and rates of sexually transmitted infections in an urban setting. Health Place, 23, 128–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kero, K. M., Rautava, J., Syrjänen, K., Kortekangas-Savolainen, O., Grenman, S., & Syrjänen, S. (2014). Stable marital relationship protects men from oral and genital HPV infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 33, 1211–1221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan, M. R., Behrend, L., Adimora, A. A., Weir, S. S., Tisdale, C., & Wohl, D. A. (2011). Dissolution of primary intimate relationships during incarceration and associations with post-release STI/HIV risk behavior in a Southeastern city. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 38, 43–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Latkin, C. A., Curry, A. D., Hua, W., & Davey, M. A. (2007). Direct and indirect associations of neighborhood disorder with drug use and high-risk sexual partners. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, S234–S241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Latkin, C. A., German, D., & Vlahov, D. (2013). Neighborhoods and HIV: A social ecological approach to prevention and care. The American Psychologist, 68, 210–224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Laumann, E. O., & Youm, Y. (1999). Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: A network explanation. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 26, 250–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, M., & Kretzschmar, M. (1997). Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS, 11, 641–648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nunn, A., Dickman, S., Cornwall, A., Rosengard, C., Kwakwa, H., Kim, D., … Mayer, K. H. (2011). Social, structural and behavioral drivers of concurrent partnerships among African American men in Philadelphia. AIDS Care, 23, 1392–1399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Peters, R. H., Greenbaum, P. E., Steinberg, M. L., Carter, C. R., Ortiz, M. M., Fry, B. C., & Valle, S. K. (2000). Effectiveness of screening instruments in detecting substance use disorders among prisoners. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 349–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Popkin, S., Katz, B., Cunningham, K., Brown, J., Gustafson, M., & Turner, A. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  33. Rogers, S. M., Khan, M. R., Tan, S., Turner, C. F., Miller, W. C., & Erbelding, E. (2012). Incarceration, high-risk sexual partnerships, and sexually transmitted infections in an urban population. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 88, 63–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothenberg, R. B., Potterat, J. J., Woodhouse, D. E., Muth, S. Q., Darrow, W. W., & Klovdahl, A. S. (1998). Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS, 12, 1529–1536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Scribner, R., Theall, K. P., Simonsen, N., & Robinson, W. (2010). HIV risk and the alcohol environment: Advancing an ecological epidemiology for HIV/AIDS. Alcohol Research & Health, 33, 179–183.Google Scholar
  37. South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The declining significance of neighborhoods? Marital transitions in community context. Social Forces, 78, 1067–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. South, S. J., Trent, K., & Shen, Y. (2001). Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural-opportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 743–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Theall, K. P., Scribner, R., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Cohen, D., Mason, K., & Simonsen, N. (2009). Neighbourhood alcohol availability and gonorrhea rates: Impact of social capital. Geospatial Health, 3, 241–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Thomas, J. C., Levandowski, B. A., Isler, M. R., Torrone, E., & Wilson, G. (2008). Incarceration and sexually transmitted infections: A neighborhood perspective. Journal of Urban Health, 85, 90–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas, J. C., & Torrone, E. (2006). Incarceration as forced migration: Effects on selected community health outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1762–1765.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Warner, T. D., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Relationship formation and stability in emerging adulthood: Do sex ratios matter? Social Forces, 90, 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabriya L. Linton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hannah L. F. Cooper
    • 1
  • Ruiyan Luo
    • 2
  • Conny Karnes
    • 1
  • Kristen Renneker
    • 1
  • Danielle F. Haley
    • 1
  • Emily F. Dauria
    • 3
  • Josalin Hunter-Jones
    • 1
  • Zev Ross
    • 4
  • Gina M. Wingood
    • 1
    • 8
  • Adaora A. Adimora
    • 5
    • 6
  • Loida Bonney
    • 7
  • Richard Rothenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health EducationRollins School of Public Health, Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Division of Infectious DiseaseAlpert Medical School, Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  4. 4.ZevRoss Spatial AnalysisIthacaUSA
  5. 5.Division of Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel HillUSA
  6. 6.Department of EpidemiologyGillings School of Public Health, University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  7. 7.Department of General MedicineEmory University School of MedicineFayettevilleUSA
  8. 8. Department of Sociomedical SciencesColumbia University’s Mailman School of Public HealthNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations