Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive Perceptions of Genital Appearance and Feeling Sexually Attractive: Is It a Matter of Sexual Esteem?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between perceptions of genital appearance and self-perceived sexual attractiveness. The study sample included men and women (aged 18–45 years, M = 23.7, SD = 4.98) who identified as heterosexual (n = 1017), gay or lesbian (n = 1225), or bisexual (n = 651). Participants responded to an online survey assessing their self-perceived sexual attractiveness, genital self-image, genital self-consciousness during sexual activity, and sexual esteem. Based on previous findings, we hypothesized a positive link between genital self-perceptions and self-perceived sexual attractiveness, with sexual esteem acting as a mediator. We tested this hypothesis using structural equation modeling. Analyses revealed a significant association between both genital self-image and genital self-consciousness and self-perceived sexual attractiveness. However, these relationships were at least partially mediated by sexual esteem, across both gender and sexual orientation. The findings suggest that, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, individuals who maintain a positive genital self-image or lack genital self-consciousness, are more likely to experience greater sexual esteem, and in turn, feel more sexually attractive. The findings have implications for the importance of genital appearance perceptions and improving individuals’ sexual esteem and self-perceived sexual attractiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amos, N., & McCabe, M. P. (2015a). Conceptualising and measuring perceptions of sexual attractiveness: Are there differences across gender and sexual orientation? Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & McCabe, M. P. (2015b). Self-perceptions of sexual attractiveness: Is physical appearance of primary importance across gender and sexual orientation? Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.1002128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, S. M., & Senn, C. Y. (1998). Body image and sociocultural norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 385–401. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00164.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, L. A., Berman, J., Miles, M., Pollets, D., & Powell, J. A. (2003). Genital self-image as a component of sexual health: Relationship between genital self-image, female sexual function, and quality of life measures. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 29, 11–21. doi:10.1080/713847124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2005). In search of (better) sexual pleasure: Female genital ‘cosmetic’ surgery. Sexualities, 8, 407–424. doi:10.1177/1363460705056625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2010). Famale genital cosmetic surgery: A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 1393–1407. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, L. D., & Adler, N. E. (1992). Female and male perceptions of ideal body shapes: Distorted views among Caucasian college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 69–79. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00240.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukier, W. L., Cody, S., & Nesselroth, E. J. (2006). Genres of spam: Expectations and deceptions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference in System Science, Kauia, HI.

  • Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Bishop, P. J., & Parish, A. (2010). Human physique and sexual attractiveness in men and women: A New Zealand–U.S. comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 798–806. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9441-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzoi, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1986). The Body Esteem Scale: A convergent and discriminant validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 24–31. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M. T., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2, 81–86. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haavio-Mannila, E., & Purhonen, S. (2001). Slimness and self-rated sexual attractiveness: Comparisons of men and women in two cultures. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 102–110. doi:10.1080/00224490109552077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, C. J., Halliwell, E., & Clarke, V. (2015). An examination of the tripartite influence model of body image: Does women’s sexual identity make a difference? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 337–348. doi:10.1177/0361684314554917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koning, M., Zeijlmans, I. A., Boiman, T. K., & Van Der Lei, B. (2009). Female attitudes regarding labia minora appearance and reduction with consideration of media influence. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 29, 65–71. doi:10.1016/j.asj.2008.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 129–143. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.7.3.129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J., Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Liao, L.-M., & Creighton, S. M. (2005). Female genital appearance: ‘Normality’ unfolds. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112, 643–646. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00517.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. (2008). Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: Realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 737–745. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9379-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). The shape of things to come: Gay men’s satisfaction with specific body parts. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 248–256. doi:10.1037/a0012473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. A., Morrison, T. G., & Sager, C.-L. (2004). Does body satisfaction differ between gay men and lesbian women and heterosexual men and women? A meta-analytic review. Body Image, 1, 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, T. G., Bearden, A., Ellis, S. R., & Harriman, R. (2005). Correlates of genital perceptions among Canadian post-secondary students. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume8/GenitalPerceptions.htm.

  • Morrison, T. G., Bearden, A., Harriman, R., Morrison, M. A., & Ellis, S. R. (2004). Correlates of exposure to sexually explicit material among Canadian post-secondary students. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, K. D. (2012). Psychometric properties of a revised Body Image Self-Consciousness scale. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallatto, C. A. (2011). Ratings of female genital attractiveness pre- and post-genital cosmetic surgery differ by age and gender. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazmany, E., Bergeron, S., Oudenhove, L., Verhaeghe, J., & Enzlin, P. (2013). Body image and genital self-image in pre-menopausal women with dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 999–1010. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0102-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinholtz, R. K., & Muelenhard, C. L. (1995). Genital perceptions and sexual activity in a college population. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 155–165. doi:10.1080/00224499509551785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, V. R., Calabrese, S. K., Rima, B. N., & Zucker, A. N. (2010a). Genital appearance dissatisfaction: Implications for women’s genital image self-consciousness, sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 394–404. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01584.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, V. R., Rima, B. N., & Calabrese, S. K. (2010b). Evulvalution: The portrayal of women’s external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie doll ideals. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 74–81. doi:10.1080/00224490903308404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G., Tiggemann, M., & Mattiske, J. (2015). Predictors of consideration of labiaplasty: An extension of the tripartite influence model of beauty ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 182–193. doi:10.1177/0361684314549949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, W., Jr., Fisher, T., & Walters, A. (1993). The Multidimensional Sexuality questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27–55. doi:10.1007/bf00849744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S., Singh, D., & Randall, P. (2000). Childhood gender nonconformity and body dissatisfaction in gay and heterosexual men. Sex Roles, 43, 427–439. doi:10.1023/a:1007126814910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–120). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Martins, Y., & Churchett, L. (2008). Beyond muscles: Unexplored parts of men’s body image. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 1163–1172. doi:10.1177/1359105308095971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., Martins, Y., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Oh to be lean and muscular: Body image ideals in gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 15–24. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.8.1.15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). The measurement of sexual-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini’s (1989) Sexuality Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 88–102. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1993.1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, H. C. (1989). An examination of the relationships between penis size and body image, genital image and perception of sexual competency on the male. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, 221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia

    Natalie Amos

  2. Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Level 6, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia

    Marita McCabe

Authors
  1. Natalie Amos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marita McCabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marita McCabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amos, N., McCabe, M. Positive Perceptions of Genital Appearance and Feeling Sexually Attractive: Is It a Matter of Sexual Esteem?. Arch Sex Behav 45, 1249–1258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0680-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0680-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation