Bullying, Physical Aggression, Gender-Atypicality, and Sexual Orientation in Samoan Males
- 456 Downloads
Bullying is characterized by the repeated attempts of a group or individual to gain social advantage by the use of relational, verbal, or physical aggression against a target, especially when there is a perceived or actual power imbalance (Espelage & Swearer, 2003). One consistent finding is that gay (i.e., androphilic) males report higher rates of victimization due to bullying in adolescence than their heterosexual (i.e., gynephilic) counterparts. Western data indicate that gender-atypical behavior, regardless of sexual orientation, is a key predictor of victimization due to bullying. Androphilic males generally display childhood gender-atypicality, including reduced levels of physical aggression, which may cause bullies to perceive them as “easy” targets. In order to test the associations between sexual orientation, childhood gender-atypicality, and recalled victimization due to bullying, a sample of Samoan gynephilic men (n = 100) were compared to a group of Samoan transgender androphilic males (n = 103), known as fa’afafine. Although the fa’afafine reported far more childhood gender-atypicality, the two groups did not differ significantly on measures of physical aggression or their reported rates of victimization due to bullying. Additionally, greater physical aggression, not gender-atypicality, was the only significant predictor of being bullied in both men and fa’afafine. These results suggest that there is nothing inherent in sexual orientation or childhood gender-atypicality that would potentiate victimization from bullying. Instead, the cultural context in which a bully functions influences the extent to which these are “acceptable” reasons to target certain individuals.
KeywordsBullying Physical aggression Gender-atypicality Sexual orientation Samoa
We wish to thank Trisha Tuiloma, the Government of Samoa, and those who participated in our study. We also thank the Editor and two anonymous referees. Special thanks to Alatina Ioelu. This research was supported by the University of Lethbridge, a SSHRC-CGS award to SWS, and a SSHRC Insight Grant to PLV.
- Bailey, J. M. (2003). The man who would be queen: The science of gender-bending and transsexualism. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
- Bergling, T. (2001). Sissyphobia: Gay men and effeminate behavior. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
- Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 452–459.Google Scholar
- Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Lereya, S. T., Shanahan, L., Worthman, L., & Costello, E. J. (2014). Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-grade systemic inflammation into adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 7570–7575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Craig W. M., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simmons-Morton, B., … Picket., W. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 5216–5224.Google Scholar
- D’Augelli, A. R., Grossman, A. H., & Starks, M. T. (2006). Gender atypicality and sexual orientation development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health, 12, 121–143.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32, 365–383.Google Scholar
- Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., Fredriks, A. M., Vogels, T., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2006). Do bullied children get ill, or do ill children get bullied? A prospective cohort study on the relationship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics, 117, 1568–1574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
- Murray, S. O. (2000). Homosexualities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- O’Shaughnessy, M., Russell, S., Heck, K., Calhoun, C., & Laub, C. (2004). Safe place to learn: Consequences of harassment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation and gender non-conformity and steps for making schools safer. San Francisco: California Safe Schools Coalition.Google Scholar
- Rivers, I. (2001a). The bullying of sexual minorities at school: Its nature and long-term correlates. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 32–46.Google Scholar
- Roberts, A. L., Rosario, M., Slopen, N., Calzo, J. P., & Austin, S. B. (2013). Childhood gender nonconformity, bullying victimization, and depressive symptoms across adolescence and early adulthood: An 11-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 143–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.Google Scholar
- Swearer, S. M., Turner, R. K., Givens, J. E., & Pollack, W. S. (2008). “You’re so gay!”: Do different forms of bullying matter for adolescent males? School Psychology Review, 37, 160–173.Google Scholar
- United Nations (2015). UN data. Retrieved from https://data.un.org/CountryProfile.aspx?crName=Samoa.