The purpose of this study was to compare male and female college students in four countries (Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the U.S.) on their lifetime experiences (prevalence) and frequency of recent experiences with six types of online sexual activities (OSA): sexual information, sexual entertainment, sexual contacts, sexual minority communities, sexual products, and sex work. Participants (N = 2690; M age, 24.65 years; 53.4 % women, 46.6 % men) were recruited from a university in each of the countries to complete an online survey that included background and demographic questions, and questions about OSA. Most participants reported experience with accessing sexual information (89.8 %) and sexual entertainment (76.5 %) online. Almost half (48.5 %) reported browsing for sexual products, and a substantial minority reported having engaged in cybersex (30.8 %). Very few participants (1.1 %) paid for online sexual services or received payment (0.5 %). In general, participants showed relatively infrequent experience with all types of OSA within the last 3 months. Men showed both higher prevalence and frequency of use of sexually stimulating material online than did women. However, this gender gap was smaller than in previous studies. Country and gender by country effects were (with one exception) either very small or non-existent, suggesting that, overall, students in the four countries were similar in their OSA experiences. Results are discussed in light of an emerging global net generation and globalized sexual culture.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Albright, J. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in Internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 175–186.
Ballester-Arnal, R., Castro-Calvo, J., Gil-Llario, M. D., & Giménez-García, C. (2013). Relationship status as an influence on cybersex activity: Cybersex, youth, and steady partner. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40, 444–456. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2013.772549.
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273.
Boies, S. C. (2002). University students’ uses of and reactions to online sexual information and entertainment: Links to online and offline sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 77–89.
Buhi, E. R., Daley, E. M., Oberne, A., Smith, S. A., Schneider, T., & Fuhrmann, H. J. (2010). Quality and accuracy of sexual health information web sites visited by young people. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 206–208. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.002.
Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25.
Byers, E. S., & Shaughnessy, K. (2014). Attitudes toward online sexual activities. Cyberpsychology. doi:10.5817/CP2014-1-10.
Byers, L. J., Menzies, K. S., & O’Grady, W. L. (2004). The impact of computer variables on the viewing and sending of sexually explicit material on the Internet: Testing Cooper’s “Triple-A engine”. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 13, 157–170.
Cooper, A., Månsson, S.-A., Daneback, K., Tikkanen, R., & Ross, M. (2003). Predicting the future of Internet sex: Online sexual activities in Sweden. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18, 277–291. doi:10.1080/1468199031000153919.
Cooper, A., Morahan-Martin, J., Mathy, R. M., & Maheu, M. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 105–129. doi:10.1080/00926230252851861.
Cunningham, S., & Kendall, T. D. (2011). Prostitution 2.0: The changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 273–287. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.001.
Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Månsson, S.-A. (2005). An Internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 321–328. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-3120-z.
Daneback, K., Månsson, S.-A., & Ross, M. W. (2007). Using the Internet to find offline sex partners. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 100–107. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9986.
Daneback, K., Månsson, S.-A., & Ross, M. (2011). Online sex shops: Purchasing sexual merchandise on the Internet. International Journal of Sexual Health, 23, 102–110.
Daneback, K., Månsson, S.-A., Ross, M. W., & Markham, C. M. (2012). The Internet as a source of information about sexuality. Sex Education, 12, 583–598. doi:10.1080/14681811.2011.627739.
Döring, N. (2009). The Internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1089–1101. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.003.
Döring, N. (2012). Internet sexuality. In Z. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cyber behavior (pp. 807–827). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Eleuteri, S., Tripodi, F., Petruccelli, I., Rossi, R., & Simonelli, C. (2014). Questionnaires and scales for the evaluation of the online sexual activities: A review of 20 years of research. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace,. doi:10.5817/CP2014-1-2.
Esmer, Y. R., & Pettersson, T. (2007). Measuring and mapping cultures: 25 years of comparative value surveys. Leiden: Brill.
Goodson, P., McCormick, D., & Evans, A. (2001). Searching for sexually explicit materials on the Internet: An exploratory study of college students’ behavior and attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 101–118. doi:10.1023/A:1002724116437.
Griffin, C. (2001). Imagining new narratives of youth: Youth research, the “new Europe” and global youth culture. Childhood, 8, 147–166. doi:10.1177/0907568201008002002.
Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men’s use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 390–409. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.871626.
Grov, C., Gillespie, B. J., Royce, T., & Lever, J. (2011). Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: A U.S. online survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 429–439. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9598-z.
Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered Internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37, 352–374. doi:10.1177/0093650209356439.
Hillier, L., & Harrison, L. (2007). Building realities less limited than their own: Young people practising same-sex attraction on the Internet. Sexualities, 10, 82–100. doi:10.1177/1363460707072956.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kunnuji, M. (2011). Risk-bearing sexuality within the context of internet use among young people in Lagos metropolis. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 111–121.
Lever, J., Grov, C., Royce, T., & Gillespie, B. J. (2008). Searching for love in all the “write” places: Exploring Internet personals use by sexual orientation, gender, and age. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20, 233–246. doi:10.1080/19317610802411532.
Lunney, G. H. (1970). Using analysis of variance with a dichotomous dependent variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 263–269.
MacDonald, P. L., & Gardner, R. C. (2000). Type I error rate comparisons of post hoc procedures for i j chi square tables. Educational Psychological Measurement, 60, 735–754. doi:10.1177/00131640021970871.
Minichiello, V., Scott, J., & Callander, D. (2013). New pleasures and old dangers: Reinventing male sex work. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 263–275. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.760189.
Mondin, A. (2014). Fair-trade porn + niche markets + feminist audience. Porn Studies, 1, 189–192. doi:10.1080/23268743.2014.888251.
Mustanski, B. S., Newcomb, M. E., Du Bois, S. N., Garcia, S. C., & Grov, C. (2011). HIV in young men who have sex with men: A review of epidemiology, risk, and protective factors, and interventions. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 218–253. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.558645.
Nip, J. Y. M. (2004). The relationship between online and offline communities: The case of the queer sisters. Media, Culture and Society, 26, 409–428. doi:10.1177/0163443704042262.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.
Podlas, K. (2000). Mistresses of their domain: How female entrepreneurs in cyberporn are initiating a gender power shift. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3, 847–854. doi:10.1089/10949310050191827.
Schauer, T. (2005). Women’s porno: The heterosexual female gaze in porn sites “for women”. Sexuality and Culture, 9, 42–64. doi:10.1007/s12119-005-1007-8.
Schneider, A. (2005). A model of sexual constraint and sexual emancipation. Sociological Perspectives, 48, 225–270.
Shaughnessy, K., & Byers, E. S. (2013). Seeing the forest with the trees: Cybersex as a case study of single-item versus multi-item measures of sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45, 220–229. doi:10.1037/a0031331.
Shaughnessy, K., & Byers, E. S. (2014). Contextualizing cybersex experience: Heterosexually identified men and women’s desire for and experiences with cybersex with three types of partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 178–185. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.005.
Shaughnessy, K., Byers, E. S., Clowater, S. L., & Kalinowski, A. (2014). Self-appraisals of arousal-oriented online sexual activities in university and community samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1187–1197. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0115-z.
Shaughnessy, K., Byers, E. S., & Walsh, L. (2011). Online sexual activity experience of heterosexual students: Gender similarities and differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 419–427. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9629-9.
Simon, L., & Daneback, K. (2013). Adolescents’ use of the Internet for sex education: A thematic and critical review of the literature. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25, 305–319. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.823899.
Smith, M. D., & Grov, C. (2011). In the company of men: Inside the lives of male prostitutes. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Velezmoro, R., Negy, C., & Livia, J. (2012). Online sexual activity: Cross-national comparison between United States and Peruvian college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1015–1025. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9862-x.
Wells, B. E., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Changes in young people’s sexual behavior and attitudes, 1943–1999: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 9, 249.
Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student samples. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13, 496–502.
Zheng, L., & Zheng, Y. (2014). Online sexual activity in mainland China: Relationship to sexual sensation seeking and sociosexuality. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 323–329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.062.
We would like to thank the following individuals who helped with this study: Linda Agyemang, Susan Voyer, and Sarah Vannier. Finally, a special thanks to our participants. Without them, this study would not have been possible.
See Table 5.
About this article
Cite this article
Döring, N., Daneback, K., Shaughnessy, K. et al. Online Sexual Activity Experiences Among College Students: A Four-Country Comparison. Arch Sex Behav 46, 1641–1652 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0656-4